From: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, arun.r.murthy@intel.com,
Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14021768792 for BMG DP for link_m/n ratio > 10
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:44:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911041449.3699400-9-suraj.kandpal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911041449.3699400-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Handle the bypass logic for the M/N ratio limit for DP.
Calculate the M/N ratio, check if it can bypass the limit, and set the
appropriate flags for the workaround.
The workaround is only intended for 128b/132b links, so restrict it to
those.
Bspec also restricts the Link M/N values from changing outside of a
modeset while the mechanism is active, so disable DRRS and the seamless
M/N fastset path for such a configuration.
Bspec: 49266
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 068798658bd1..f0adf3c9a097 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -3529,7 +3529,6 @@ void intel_get_m_n(struct intel_display *display,
m_n->tu = REG_FIELD_GET(TU_SIZE_MASK, intel_de_read(display, data_m_reg)) + 1;
}
-static
bool intel_display_can_bypass_m_n_limit(struct intel_display *display,
int m_n_ratio,
enum pipe pipe)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
index fc474d9cd533..dc1c0da3e45d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
@@ -526,5 +526,7 @@ int intel_crtc_num_joined_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_display_get_link_m_n(u32 *link_m, u32 *link_n,
u32 pixel_clock,
u32 link_clock);
+bool intel_display_can_bypass_m_n_limit(struct intel_display *display,
+ int m_n_ratio, enum pipe pipe);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 585762be07bb..27ffd937c75f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -3353,6 +3353,9 @@ static bool can_enable_drrs(struct intel_connector *connector,
if (pipe_config->vrr.enable)
return false;
+ if (pipe_config->dp_m_n.bypass_m_n_ratio_limit)
+ return false;
+
/*
* DRRS and PSR can't be enable together, so giving preference to PSR
* as it allows more power-savings by complete shutting down display,
@@ -3377,6 +3380,7 @@ void intel_dp_check_m_n_ratio(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
struct intel_link_m_n *m_n)
{
struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
+ struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
int max_m_n_ratio = intel_dp_get_max_m_n_ratio(display);
int m_n_ratio;
@@ -3385,10 +3389,21 @@ void intel_dp_check_m_n_ratio(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
m_n_ratio = DIV_ROUND_UP(m_n->link_m, m_n->link_n);
- if (m_n_ratio > max_m_n_ratio)
- drm_WARN(display->drm, 1,
- "Link M/N ratio (%d) exceeds max allowed (%d)\n",
- m_n_ratio, max_m_n_ratio);
+ if (m_n_ratio <= max_m_n_ratio)
+ return;
+
+ if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state) &&
+ intel_display_can_bypass_m_n_limit(display, m_n_ratio, crtc->pipe)) {
+ m_n->bypass_m_n_ratio_limit = true;
+ drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
+ "Bypassing Link_m/Link_n ratio limit (ratio %d)\n",
+ m_n_ratio);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ drm_WARN(display->drm, 1,
+ "Link M/N ratio (%d) exceeds max allowed (%d)\n",
+ m_n_ratio, max_m_n_ratio);
}
static void
@@ -3405,7 +3420,8 @@ intel_dp_drrs_compute_config(struct intel_connector *connector,
* FIXME all joined pipes share the same transcoder.
* Need to account for that when updating M/N live.
*/
- if (has_seamless_m_n(connector) && !pipe_config->joiner_pipes)
+ if (has_seamless_m_n(connector) && !pipe_config->joiner_pipes &&
+ !pipe_config->dp_m_n.bypass_m_n_ratio_limit)
pipe_config->update_m_n = true;
if (!can_enable_drrs(connector, pipe_config, downclock_mode)) {
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 4:14 [PATCH 00/10] Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-11 4:14 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/display: Add helper to compute link M/N ratio for reuse Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-11 11:24 ` Jani Nikula
2026-09-11 11:28 ` Jani Nikula
2026-09-11 4:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/dp: Limit M/N ratio for DP SST Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-11 4:14 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/dp_mst: Limit M/N ratio for MST Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-11 4:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 4:14 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/dp: Add M/N ratio check with warning for DP link config Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-11 4:14 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/display: Add bits for link_n_extended for DISPLAY >= 14 Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-11 4:14 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/display_wa: Add support for Wa_14021768792 Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-11 4:14 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/display: Add bits for Wa_14021768792 for linkm/n ratio > 10 Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-11 4:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 4:14 ` Suraj Kandpal [this message]
2026-09-11 4:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14021768792 for BMG DP for link_m/n " sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 4:14 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/dp: Extend intel_dp_can_support_m_n() for BMG M/N bypass Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-11 4:14 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/dp: Bump the max Link M/N ratio to 22 for DISPLAY_VER >= 35 Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-11 5:14 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit (rev6) Patchwork
2026-09-11 23:52 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911041449.3699400-9-suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--to=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox