public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915: use kref_put_mutex in i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked
@ 2015-04-07  9:32 Maarten Lankhorst
  2015-04-07 13:37 ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2015-04-07  9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Intel Graphics Development

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index b13c5526a73b..7aaf8eddf19c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2146,14 +2146,14 @@ i915_gem_request_unreference(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
 static inline void
 i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
 {
-	if (req && !atomic_add_unless(&req->ref.refcount, -1, 1)) {
-		struct drm_device *dev = req->ring->dev;
+	struct drm_device *dev;
+
+	if (!req)
+		return;
 
-		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-		if (likely(atomic_dec_and_test(&req->ref.refcount)))
-			i915_gem_request_free(&req->ref);
+	dev = req->ring->dev;
+	if (kref_put_mutex(&req->ref, i915_gem_request_free, &dev->struct_mutex))
 		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-	}
 }
 
 static inline void i915_gem_request_assign(struct drm_i915_gem_request **pdst,

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: use kref_put_mutex in i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked
  2015-04-07  9:32 [PATCH] drm/i915: use kref_put_mutex in i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked Maarten Lankhorst
@ 2015-04-07 13:37 ` Daniel Vetter
  2015-04-07 13:51   ` Maarten Lankhorst
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2015-04-07 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: Intel Graphics Development

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:32:02AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index b13c5526a73b..7aaf8eddf19c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2146,14 +2146,14 @@ i915_gem_request_unreference(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>  static inline void
>  i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>  {
> -	if (req && !atomic_add_unless(&req->ref.refcount, -1, 1)) {
> -		struct drm_device *dev = req->ring->dev;
> +	struct drm_device *dev;
> +
> +	if (!req)
> +		return;
>  
> -		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -		if (likely(atomic_dec_and_test(&req->ref.refcount)))
> -			i915_gem_request_free(&req->ref);
> +	dev = req->ring->dev;
> +	if (kref_put_mutex(&req->ref, i915_gem_request_free, &dev->struct_mutex))
>  		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);

We don't need this conditional unlock here since that's only possible if
you have a weak reference somewhere (i.e. using kref_get_unless_zero). If
the object only has strong references and you're dropping the last one it
can't magically get resurrected somehow.

And drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked wants the same patch I think.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: use kref_put_mutex in i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked
  2015-04-07 13:37 ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2015-04-07 13:51   ` Maarten Lankhorst
  2015-04-07 14:04     ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maarten Lankhorst @ 2015-04-07 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: Intel Graphics Development

Op 07-04-15 om 15:37 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:32:02AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index b13c5526a73b..7aaf8eddf19c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -2146,14 +2146,14 @@ i915_gem_request_unreference(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>>  static inline void
>>  i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
>>  {
>> -	if (req && !atomic_add_unless(&req->ref.refcount, -1, 1)) {
>> -		struct drm_device *dev = req->ring->dev;
>> +	struct drm_device *dev;
>> +
>> +	if (!req)
>> +		return;
>>  
>> -		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>> -		if (likely(atomic_dec_and_test(&req->ref.refcount)))
>> -			i915_gem_request_free(&req->ref);
>> +	dev = req->ring->dev;
>> +	if (kref_put_mutex(&req->ref, i915_gem_request_free, &dev->struct_mutex))
>>  		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> We don't need this conditional unlock here since that's only possible if
> you have a weak reference somewhere (i.e. using kref_get_unless_zero). If
> the object only has strong references and you're dropping the last one it
> can't magically get resurrected somehow.
Because we use the same put call for kref_put and kref_put_mutex we do need to unlock struct_mutex here,
kref_put_mutex doesn't release the mutex if true, so either the release call needs to do it or the callee.

> And drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked wants the same patch I think.
Indeed it does, but with slightly more lockdep annotation!
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: use kref_put_mutex in i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked
  2015-04-07 13:51   ` Maarten Lankhorst
@ 2015-04-07 14:04     ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2015-04-07 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maarten Lankhorst; +Cc: Intel Graphics Development

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:51:44PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 07-04-15 om 15:37 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:32:02AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> index b13c5526a73b..7aaf8eddf19c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> @@ -2146,14 +2146,14 @@ i915_gem_request_unreference(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> >>  static inline void
> >>  i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> >>  {
> >> -	if (req && !atomic_add_unless(&req->ref.refcount, -1, 1)) {
> >> -		struct drm_device *dev = req->ring->dev;
> >> +	struct drm_device *dev;
> >> +
> >> +	if (!req)
> >> +		return;
> >>  
> >> -		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >> -		if (likely(atomic_dec_and_test(&req->ref.refcount)))
> >> -			i915_gem_request_free(&req->ref);
> >> +	dev = req->ring->dev;
> >> +	if (kref_put_mutex(&req->ref, i915_gem_request_free, &dev->struct_mutex))
> >>  		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > We don't need this conditional unlock here since that's only possible if
> > you have a weak reference somewhere (i.e. using kref_get_unless_zero). If
> > the object only has strong references and you're dropping the last one it
> > can't magically get resurrected somehow.
> Because we use the same put call for kref_put and kref_put_mutex we do need to unlock struct_mutex here,
> kref_put_mutex doesn't release the mutex if true, so either the release call needs to do it or the callee.

Indeed I didn't realize that all existing users of kref_put_mutex unlock
the mutex in the free callback. So looks all good, so applied it.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-07 14:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-07  9:32 [PATCH] drm/i915: use kref_put_mutex in i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked Maarten Lankhorst
2015-04-07 13:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-04-07 13:51   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-04-07 14:04     ` Daniel Vetter

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox