From: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/i915/gt: Support aux invalidation on all engines
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 21:11:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58136997-4870-c321-a04a-d10443e92546@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230717173059.422892-7-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
On 17.07.2023 19:30, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Perform some refactoring with the purpose of keeping in one
> single place all the operations around the aux table
> invalidation.
>
> With this refactoring add more engines where the invalidation
> should be performed.
>
> Fixes: 972282c4cf24 ("drm/i915/gen12: Add aux table invalidate for all engines")
> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.8+
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c | 63 +++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.h | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 17 +------
> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c
> index fbc70f3b7f2fd..6d21a1ac06e73 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,8 @@ static u32 preparser_disable(bool state)
> return MI_ARB_CHECK | 1 << 8 | state;
> }
>
> -u32 *gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 *cs, const i915_reg_t inv_reg)
> +static u32 *gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 *cs,
> + const i915_reg_t inv_reg)
> {
> u32 gsi_offset = gt->uncore->gsi_offset;
>
> @@ -187,6 +188,40 @@ u32 *gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 *cs, const i915_reg_t inv
> return cs;
> }
>
> +static i915_reg_t intel_get_aux_inv_reg(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +{
> + if (HAS_FLAT_CCS(engine->i915))
> + return _MMIO(0);
Why not INVALID_MMIO_REG ? Here and below.
> +
> + switch (engine->id) {
> + case RCS0:
> + return GEN12_CCS_AUX_INV;
> + case VCS0:
> + return GEN12_VD0_AUX_INV;
> + case VCS2:
> + return GEN12_VD2_AUX_INV;
> + case VECS0:
> + return GEN12_VE0_AUX_INV;
> + default:
> + return _MMIO(0);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static bool intel_engine_has_aux_inv(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +{
> + i915_reg_t reg = intel_get_aux_inv_reg(engine);
> +
> + return !!reg.reg;
return i915_mmio_reg_valid(intel_get_aux_inv_reg(engine));
> +}
> +
> +u32 *intel_emit_aux_table_inv(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 *cs)
> +{
> + i915_reg_t reg = intel_get_aux_inv_reg(engine);
> + struct intel_gt *gt = engine->gt;
> +
> + return reg.reg ? gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(gt, cs, reg) : cs;
> +}
> +
I am not sure about prefixes, IMHO gen12_ instead of intel_ is more
adequate as this is only gen12 feature, works only on gen12, and is
called from gen12 context, up to you. In any case we can squash
intel_emit_aux_table_inv and gen12_emit_aux_table_inv into one function,
am I right?
Regards
Andrzej
> static int mtl_dummy_pipe_control(struct i915_request *rq)
> {
> /* Wa_14016712196 */
> @@ -311,11 +346,7 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode)
>
> cs = gen8_emit_pipe_control(cs, flags, LRC_PPHWSP_SCRATCH_ADDR);
>
> - if (!HAS_FLAT_CCS(rq->engine->i915)) {
> - /* hsdes: 1809175790 */
> - cs = gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(rq->engine->gt, cs,
> - GEN12_CCS_AUX_INV);
> - }
> + cs = intel_emit_aux_table_inv(engine, cs);
>
> *cs++ = preparser_disable(false);
> intel_ring_advance(rq, cs);
> @@ -326,21 +357,14 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode)
>
> int gen12_emit_flush_xcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode)
> {
> - intel_engine_mask_t aux_inv = 0;
> u32 cmd, *cs;
>
> cmd = 4;
> if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE) {
> cmd += 2;
>
> - if (!HAS_FLAT_CCS(rq->engine->i915) &&
> - (rq->engine->class == VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS ||
> - rq->engine->class == VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS)) {
> - aux_inv = rq->engine->mask &
> - ~GENMASK(_BCS(I915_MAX_BCS - 1), BCS0);
> - if (aux_inv)
> - cmd += 10;
> - }
> + if (intel_engine_has_aux_inv(rq->engine))
> + cmd += 10;
> }
>
> cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, cmd);
> @@ -371,14 +395,7 @@ int gen12_emit_flush_xcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode)
> *cs++ = 0; /* upper addr */
> *cs++ = 0; /* value */
>
> - if (aux_inv) { /* hsdes: 1809175790 */
> - if (rq->engine->class == VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS)
> - cs = gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(rq->engine->gt,
> - cs, GEN12_VD0_AUX_INV);
> - else
> - cs = gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(rq->engine->gt,
> - cs, GEN12_VE0_AUX_INV);
> - }
> + cs = intel_emit_aux_table_inv(rq->engine, cs);
>
> if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE)
> *cs++ = preparser_disable(false);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.h
> index 655e5c00ddc27..d938c94524510 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_engine_cs.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include "intel_gt_regs.h"
> #include "intel_gpu_commands.h"
>
> +struct intel_engine_cs;
> struct intel_gt;
> struct i915_request;
>
> @@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ u32 *gen8_emit_fini_breadcrumb_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs);
> u32 *gen11_emit_fini_breadcrumb_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs);
> u32 *gen12_emit_fini_breadcrumb_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs);
>
> -u32 *gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 *cs, const i915_reg_t inv_reg);
> +u32 *intel_emit_aux_table_inv(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 *cs);
>
> static inline u32 *
> __gen8_emit_pipe_control(u32 *batch, u32 flags0, u32 flags1, u32 offset)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 235f3fab60a98..70054767c88c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1371,10 +1371,7 @@ gen12_emit_indirect_ctx_rcs(const struct intel_context *ce, u32 *cs)
> IS_DG2_G11(ce->engine->i915))
> cs = gen8_emit_pipe_control(cs, PIPE_CONTROL_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_INVALIDATE, 0);
>
> - /* hsdes: 1809175790 */
> - if (!HAS_FLAT_CCS(ce->engine->i915))
> - cs = gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(ce->engine->gt,
> - cs, GEN12_CCS_AUX_INV);
> + cs = intel_emit_aux_table_inv(ce->engine, cs);
>
> /* Wa_16014892111 */
> if (IS_MTL_GRAPHICS_STEP(ce->engine->i915, M, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> @@ -1399,17 +1396,7 @@ gen12_emit_indirect_ctx_xcs(const struct intel_context *ce, u32 *cs)
> PIPE_CONTROL_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_INVALIDATE,
> 0);
>
> - /* hsdes: 1809175790 */
> - if (!HAS_FLAT_CCS(ce->engine->i915)) {
> - if (ce->engine->class == VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS)
> - cs = gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(ce->engine->gt,
> - cs, GEN12_VD0_AUX_INV);
> - else if (ce->engine->class == VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS)
> - cs = gen12_emit_aux_table_inv(ce->engine->gt,
> - cs, GEN12_VE0_AUX_INV);
> - }
> -
> - return cs;
> + return intel_emit_aux_table_inv(ce->engine, cs);
> }
>
> static void
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-17 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-17 17:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/6] Update AUX invalidation sequence Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/i915/gt: Cleanup aux invalidation registers Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/i915/gt: Ensure memory quiesced before invalidation Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 17:54 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-17 20:31 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-17 21:52 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 22:00 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-18 0:28 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-18 15:53 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-17 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/i915/gt: Rename flags with bit_group_X according to the datasheet Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 17:32 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 17:59 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-17 18:21 ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-07-17 21:54 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 18:45 ` Nirmoy Das
2023-07-17 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/i915/gt: Enable the CCS_FLUSH bit in the pipe control Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 18:23 ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-07-17 19:40 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-17 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/i915/gt: Poll aux invalidation register bit on invalidation Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 18:51 ` Andrzej Hajda
2023-07-17 20:05 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-17 17:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/i915/gt: Support aux invalidation on all engines Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 19:11 ` Andrzej Hajda [this message]
2023-07-17 22:00 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 20:27 ` Matt Roper
2023-07-17 22:02 ` Andi Shyti
2023-07-17 21:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Update AUX invalidation sequence (rev4) Patchwork
2023-07-17 21:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-07-17 21:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-07-18 3:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58136997-4870-c321-a04a-d10443e92546@intel.com \
--to=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox