From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
"Adrián Larumbe" <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm: Do not round to megabytes for greater than 1MiB sizes in fdinfo stats
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:43:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b4eb4bd-fe32-477e-836a-4f745a173772@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d1a3df17-4c50-68ba-35d4-8a7ef62b84fb@linux.intel.com>
On 28/09/2023 13:47, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 27/09/2023 14:48, Steven Price wrote:
>> On 27/09/2023 14:38, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>
>>> It is better not to lose precision and not revert to 1 MiB size
>>> granularity for every size greater than 1 MiB.
>>>
>>> Sizes in KiB should not be so troublesome to read (and in fact machine
>>> parsing is I expect the norm here), they align with other api like
>>> /proc/meminfo, and they allow writing tests for the interface without
>>> having to embed drm.ko implementation knowledge into them. (Like knowing
>>> that minimum buffer size one can use for successful verification has
>>> to be
>>> 1MiB aligned, and on top account for any pre-existing memory utilisation
>>> outside of driver's control.)
>>>
>>> But probably even more importantly I think that it is just better to
>>> show
>>> the accurate sizes and not arbitrary lose precision for a little bit
>>> of a
>>> stretched use case of eyeballing fdinfo text directly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@collabora.com>
>>> Cc: steven.price@arm.com
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>
> Thanks! Rob? Can we have your blessing? Could you live with KiBs? :)
Acked received on #dri-devel:
[12:15] <tursulin> robclark: ping on https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2023-September/424905.html - can you live with it or object?
[14:41] <robclark> tursulin: a-b
Adding the drm-misc maintainers with an ask to merge please.
Regards,
Tvrtko
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
>>> index e692770ef6d3..ecb5038009e7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c
>>> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static void print_size(struct drm_printer *p,
>>> const char *stat,
>>> unsigned u;
>>> for (u = 0; u < ARRAY_SIZE(units) - 1; u++) {
>>> - if (sz < SZ_1K)
>>> + if (sz == 0 || !IS_ALIGNED(sz, SZ_1K))
>>> break;
>>> sz = div_u64(sz, SZ_1K);
>>> }
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-26 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 13:38 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 0/7] fdinfo memory stats Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm: Do not round to megabytes for greater than 1MiB sizes in fdinfo stats Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 13:48 ` Steven Price
2023-09-28 12:47 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-10-26 14:43 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2023-11-02 9:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-11-06 10:45 ` [Intel-gfx] (subset) " Maxime Ripard
2023-09-27 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Add ability for tracking buffer objects per client Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Record which client owns a VM Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Track page table backing store usage Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Account ring buffer and context state storage Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Add stable memory region names Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Implement fdinfo memory stats printing Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-09-27 20:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for fdinfo memory stats (rev9) Patchwork
2023-09-27 20:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-09-28 10:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b4eb4bd-fe32-477e-836a-4f745a173772@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=adrian.larumbe@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox