From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/cnl: Fix PORT_TX_DW5/7 register address
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:02:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874lmi4agp.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180215095643.3844-2-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com> wrote:
> Register Address for CNL_PORT_DW5_LN0_D is 0x162E54, but current code is
> defining it as 0x162ED4. Similarly for CNL_PORT_DW7_LN0_D register address
> is defined 0x162EDC instead of 0x162E5C, fix it.
Which commit introduced the bug? Please add Fixes: annotation for it. We
want this backported.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index f6afa5e5e7c1..1412abcb27d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -2034,7 +2034,7 @@ enum i915_power_well_id {
> #define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW5_LN0_AE 0x162454
> #define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW5_LN0_B 0x162654
> #define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW5_LN0_C 0x162C54
> -#define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW5_LN0_D 0x162ED4
> +#define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW5_LN0_D 0x162E54
> #define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW5_LN0_F 0x162854
> #define CNL_PORT_TX_DW5_GRP(port) _MMIO_PORT6(port, \
> _CNL_PORT_TX_DW5_GRP_AE, \
> @@ -2065,7 +2065,7 @@ enum i915_power_well_id {
> #define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW7_LN0_AE 0x16245C
> #define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW7_LN0_B 0x16265C
> #define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW7_LN0_C 0x162C5C
> -#define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW7_LN0_D 0x162EDC
> +#define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW7_LN0_D 0x162E5C
> #define _CNL_PORT_TX_DW7_LN0_F 0x16285C
> #define CNL_PORT_TX_DW7_GRP(port) _MMIO_PORT6(port, \
> _CNL_PORT_TX_DW7_GRP_AE, \
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-15 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-15 9:56 [PATCH 0/3] CNL port refactoring Mahesh Kumar
2018-02-15 9:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/cnl: Fix PORT_TX_DW5/7 register address Mahesh Kumar
2018-02-15 14:02 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2018-02-15 23:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-02-16 17:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-02-15 9:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/cnl; Add macro to get PORT_TX register Mahesh Kumar
2018-02-15 9:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/cnl: Replace PORT_TX register macros with new ones Mahesh Kumar
2018-02-15 10:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for CNL port refactoring Patchwork
2018-02-15 10:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874lmi4agp.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox