From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce intel_arm_planes_on_crtc()
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:38:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d9v5exn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220211090629.15555-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> No reason the high level intel_update_crtc() needs to know
> that there is something magical about the commit order of
> planes between different platforms. So let's hide that
> detail even better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h | 6 ++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 6 +-----
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index 3355eb637eac..bba2f105b7dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -716,8 +716,8 @@ void intel_update_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> }
> }
>
> -void skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +static void skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> @@ -751,8 +751,8 @@ void skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> }
> }
>
> -void i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +static void i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> @@ -777,6 +777,17 @@ void i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> }
> }
>
> +void intel_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +{
I don't much like the intel_arm_ prefix here. I'd go for intel_plane_
something or other.
Can be fixed while applying, or later. *shrug*
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 9)
> + skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
> + else
> + i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
> +}
> +
> int intel_atomic_plane_check_clipping(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> int min_scale, int max_scale,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> index 9822b921279c..b7973e932e78 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> @@ -46,10 +46,8 @@ void intel_plane_destroy_state(struct drm_plane *plane,
> struct drm_plane_state *state);
> void intel_update_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> -void skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> -void i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> +void intel_arm_planes_on_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> const struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 3f68fb656fb5..aac1695657df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -7796,7 +7796,6 @@ static void intel_enable_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> @@ -7824,10 +7823,7 @@ static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> commit_pipe_pre_planes(state, crtc);
>
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9)
> - skl_arm_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
> - else
> - i9xx_arm_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
> + intel_arm_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
>
> commit_pipe_post_planes(state, crtc);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-16 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-11 9:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Move intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes() & co. out Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:30 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce intel_arm_planes_on_crtc() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:38 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-02-16 12:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 12:57 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Introduce scaled_planes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Use {active, scaled}_planes to compute ilk watermarks Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Remove gen6_check_mch_setup() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:54 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 10:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Add REG_GENMASK64() and REG_FIELD_GET64() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 18:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:57 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 17:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:59 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-16 10:12 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Polish ilk+ wm register bits Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 10:29 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 10:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-11 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups Patchwork
2022-02-11 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-11 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups (rev2) Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-11 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877d9v5exn.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox