Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:12:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1833ytc.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220211090629.15555-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, 11 Feb 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Give names to the SSKPD/MLTR fields, and use the
> REG_GENMASK* and REG_FIELD_GET*.
>
> Also drop the bogus non-mirrored SSKP register define.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 87c92314ee26..278c9cbc6f3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1896,10 +1896,17 @@
>  #define   MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_SHIFT		0
>  #define   MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_MASK		(0xff << MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_SHIFT)
>  
> -/* snb MCH registers for priority tuning */
>  #define MCH_SSKPD			_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5d10)
> -#define   MCH_SSKPD_WM0_MASK		0x3f
> -#define   MCH_SSKPD_WM0_VAL		0xc
> +#define   SSKPD_NEW_WM0_MASK_HSW	REG_GENMASK64(63, 56)
> +#define   SSKPD_WM4_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(40, 32)
> +#define   SSKPD_WM3_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(28, 20)
> +#define   SSKPD_WM2_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(19, 12)
> +#define   SSKPD_WM1_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(11, 4)
> +#define   SSKPD_OLD_WM0_MASK_HSW	REG_GENMASK64(3, 0)
> +#define   SSKPD_WM3_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(29, 24)
> +#define   SSKPD_WM2_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(21, 16)
> +#define   SSKPD_WM1_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(13, 8)
> +#define   SSKPD_WM0_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
>  
>  /* Clocking configuration register */
>  #define CLKCFG			_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE + 0xc00)
> @@ -4321,19 +4328,9 @@
>  
>  /* Memory latency timer register */
>  #define MLTR_ILK		_MMIO(0x11222)
> -#define  MLTR_WM1_SHIFT		0
> -#define  MLTR_WM2_SHIFT		8
>  /* the unit of memory self-refresh latency time is 0.5us */
> -#define  ILK_SRLT_MASK		0x3f
> -
> -
> -/* the address where we get all kinds of latency value */
> -#define SSKPD			_MMIO(0x5d10)
> -#define SSKPD_WM_MASK		0x3f
> -#define SSKPD_WM0_SHIFT		0
> -#define SSKPD_WM1_SHIFT		8
> -#define SSKPD_WM2_SHIFT		16
> -#define SSKPD_WM3_SHIFT		24
> +#define  MLTR_WM2_MASK		REG_GENMASK(13, 8)
> +#define  MLTR_WM1_MASK		REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
>  
>  /*
>   * The two pipe frame counter registers are not synchronized, so
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 34e46a9b8300..605944551e1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2946,27 +2946,27 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
>  		u64 sskpd = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
>  
> -		wm[0] = (sskpd >> 56) & 0xFF;
> +		wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_NEW_WM0_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
>  		if (wm[0] == 0)
> -			wm[0] = sskpd & 0xF;
> -		wm[1] = (sskpd >> 4) & 0xFF;
> -		wm[2] = (sskpd >> 12) & 0xFF;
> -		wm[3] = (sskpd >> 20) & 0x1FF;
> -		wm[4] = (sskpd >> 32) & 0x1FF;
> +			wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_OLD_WM0_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
> +		wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM1_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
> +		wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM2_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
> +		wm[3] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM3_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
> +		wm[4] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM4_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
>  	} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 6) {
>  		u32 sskpd = intel_uncore_read(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
>  
> -		wm[0] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM0_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
> -		wm[1] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM1_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
> -		wm[2] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM2_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
> -		wm[3] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM3_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
> +		wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM0_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
> +		wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM1_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
> +		wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM2_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
> +		wm[3] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM3_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
>  	} else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 5) {
>  		u32 mltr = intel_uncore_read(uncore, MLTR_ILK);
>  
>  		/* ILK primary LP0 latency is 700 ns */
>  		wm[0] = 7;
> -		wm[1] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM1_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
> -		wm[2] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM2_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
> +		wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET(MLTR_WM1_MASK, mltr);
> +		wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET(MLTR_WM2_MASK, mltr);
>  	} else {
>  		MISSING_CASE(INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv));
>  	}

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-16 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-11  9:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Move intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes() & co. out Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:30   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce intel_arm_planes_on_crtc() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:38   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 12:44     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 12:57       ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Introduce scaled_planes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:39   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Use {active, scaled}_planes to compute ilk watermarks Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:39   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Remove gen6_check_mch_setup() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:54   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 10:09     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Add REG_GENMASK64() and REG_FIELD_GET64() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 18:20   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16  9:57     ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 17:58   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:58   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:59   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-16 10:12   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-02-11  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Polish ilk+ wm register bits Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 10:29   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 10:40     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-11 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups Patchwork
2022-02-11 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-11 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups (rev2) Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-11 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r1833ytc.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox