From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:12:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1833ytc.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220211090629.15555-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Give names to the SSKPD/MLTR fields, and use the
> REG_GENMASK* and REG_FIELD_GET*.
>
> Also drop the bogus non-mirrored SSKP register define.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 87c92314ee26..278c9cbc6f3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1896,10 +1896,17 @@
> #define MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_SHIFT 0
> #define MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_MASK (0xff << MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_SHIFT)
>
> -/* snb MCH registers for priority tuning */
> #define MCH_SSKPD _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5d10)
> -#define MCH_SSKPD_WM0_MASK 0x3f
> -#define MCH_SSKPD_WM0_VAL 0xc
> +#define SSKPD_NEW_WM0_MASK_HSW REG_GENMASK64(63, 56)
> +#define SSKPD_WM4_MASK_HSW REG_GENMASK64(40, 32)
> +#define SSKPD_WM3_MASK_HSW REG_GENMASK64(28, 20)
> +#define SSKPD_WM2_MASK_HSW REG_GENMASK64(19, 12)
> +#define SSKPD_WM1_MASK_HSW REG_GENMASK64(11, 4)
> +#define SSKPD_OLD_WM0_MASK_HSW REG_GENMASK64(3, 0)
> +#define SSKPD_WM3_MASK_SNB REG_GENMASK(29, 24)
> +#define SSKPD_WM2_MASK_SNB REG_GENMASK(21, 16)
> +#define SSKPD_WM1_MASK_SNB REG_GENMASK(13, 8)
> +#define SSKPD_WM0_MASK_SNB REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
>
> /* Clocking configuration register */
> #define CLKCFG _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE + 0xc00)
> @@ -4321,19 +4328,9 @@
>
> /* Memory latency timer register */
> #define MLTR_ILK _MMIO(0x11222)
> -#define MLTR_WM1_SHIFT 0
> -#define MLTR_WM2_SHIFT 8
> /* the unit of memory self-refresh latency time is 0.5us */
> -#define ILK_SRLT_MASK 0x3f
> -
> -
> -/* the address where we get all kinds of latency value */
> -#define SSKPD _MMIO(0x5d10)
> -#define SSKPD_WM_MASK 0x3f
> -#define SSKPD_WM0_SHIFT 0
> -#define SSKPD_WM1_SHIFT 8
> -#define SSKPD_WM2_SHIFT 16
> -#define SSKPD_WM3_SHIFT 24
> +#define MLTR_WM2_MASK REG_GENMASK(13, 8)
> +#define MLTR_WM1_MASK REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
>
> /*
> * The two pipe frame counter registers are not synchronized, so
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 34e46a9b8300..605944551e1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2946,27 +2946,27 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
> u64 sskpd = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
>
> - wm[0] = (sskpd >> 56) & 0xFF;
> + wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_NEW_WM0_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
> if (wm[0] == 0)
> - wm[0] = sskpd & 0xF;
> - wm[1] = (sskpd >> 4) & 0xFF;
> - wm[2] = (sskpd >> 12) & 0xFF;
> - wm[3] = (sskpd >> 20) & 0x1FF;
> - wm[4] = (sskpd >> 32) & 0x1FF;
> + wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_OLD_WM0_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
> + wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM1_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
> + wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM2_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
> + wm[3] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM3_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
> + wm[4] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM4_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
> } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 6) {
> u32 sskpd = intel_uncore_read(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
>
> - wm[0] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM0_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
> - wm[1] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM1_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
> - wm[2] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM2_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
> - wm[3] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM3_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
> + wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM0_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
> + wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM1_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
> + wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM2_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
> + wm[3] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM3_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
> } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 5) {
> u32 mltr = intel_uncore_read(uncore, MLTR_ILK);
>
> /* ILK primary LP0 latency is 700 ns */
> wm[0] = 7;
> - wm[1] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM1_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
> - wm[2] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM2_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
> + wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET(MLTR_WM1_MASK, mltr);
> + wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET(MLTR_WM2_MASK, mltr);
> } else {
> MISSING_CASE(INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv));
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-16 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-11 9:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Move intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes() & co. out Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:30 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce intel_arm_planes_on_crtc() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:38 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 12:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-16 12:57 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Introduce scaled_planes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Use {active, scaled}_planes to compute ilk watermarks Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Remove gen6_check_mch_setup() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:54 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 10:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Add REG_GENMASK64() and REG_FIELD_GET64() Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 18:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 9:57 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines Ville Syrjala
2022-02-11 17:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-11 17:59 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-16 10:12 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-02-11 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Polish ilk+ wm register bits Ville Syrjala
2022-02-16 10:29 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-16 10:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-11 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups Patchwork
2022-02-11 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-11 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 17:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane/wm cleanups (rev2) Patchwork
2022-02-11 18:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-11 19:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-11 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r1833ytc.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox