From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/21] drm/i915: split the dpll clock compute out from display vtable.
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 13:09:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dfr7517.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210908003944.2972024-12-airlied@gmail.com>
On Wed, 08 Sep 2021, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
>
> this could be merged later but for now it's simple to split it out.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 8 +++++++-
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index b981a923cc2f..87950202f4ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -6768,10 +6768,10 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> crtc_state->update_wm_post = true;
>
> if (mode_changed && crtc_state->hw.enable &&
> - dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock &&
> + dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock &&
> !crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave &&
> !drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc_state->shared_dpll)) {
> - ret = dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock(crtc_state);
> + ret = dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock(crtc_state);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
It was there before, but yuck. Conditions like this with checks on the
existence of a vfunc are really ugly. Could benefit from a wrapper - but
that requires figuring out what the condition actually is. *facepalm*.
> }
> @@ -8807,7 +8807,7 @@ static void intel_modeset_clear_plls(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> int i;
>
> - if (!dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock)
> + if (!dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock)
> return;
>
> for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> index 210f91f4a576..9326c7cbb05c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> @@ -1367,21 +1367,21 @@ void
> intel_dpll_init_clock_hook(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9 || HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
> - dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock = hsw_crtc_compute_clock;
> + dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock = hsw_crtc_compute_clock;
> else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
> - dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock = ilk_crtc_compute_clock;
> + dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock = ilk_crtc_compute_clock;
> else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> - dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock = chv_crtc_compute_clock;
> + dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock = chv_crtc_compute_clock;
> else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv))
> - dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock = vlv_crtc_compute_clock;
> + dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock = vlv_crtc_compute_clock;
> else if (IS_G4X(dev_priv))
> - dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock = g4x_crtc_compute_clock;
> + dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock = g4x_crtc_compute_clock;
> else if (IS_PINEVIEW(dev_priv))
> - dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock = pnv_crtc_compute_clock;
> + dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock = pnv_crtc_compute_clock;
> else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != 2)
> - dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock = i9xx_crtc_compute_clock;
> + dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock = i9xx_crtc_compute_clock;
> else
> - dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock = i8xx_crtc_compute_clock;
> + dev_priv->dpll_funcs.crtc_compute_clock = i8xx_crtc_compute_clock;
> }
>
> static bool i9xx_has_pps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 49b23ea46475..461ab0a0f088 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -393,6 +393,10 @@ struct drm_i915_fdi_link_train_funcs {
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> };
>
> +struct drm_i915_dpll_funcs {
Nitpick, intel_dpll_funcs. Starting to spot the pattern? ;D
Part of the point is that I think these may eventually move to their own
headers, and I like to drive naming structs and functions after the file
name. So, you'd find intel_dpll_* stuff in intel_dpll.[ch]. Or if they
stay in i915_drv.h, at least that's the chrystal clear context.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> + int (*crtc_compute_clock)(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +};
> +
> struct drm_i915_display_funcs {
> /* Returns the active state of the crtc, and if the crtc is active,
> * fills out the pipe-config with the hw state. */
> @@ -400,7 +404,6 @@ struct drm_i915_display_funcs {
> struct intel_crtc_state *);
> void (*get_initial_plane_config)(struct intel_crtc *,
> struct intel_initial_plane_config *);
> - int (*crtc_compute_clock)(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void (*crtc_enable)(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> void (*crtc_disable)(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> @@ -1005,6 +1008,9 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> /* fdi display functions */
> struct drm_i915_fdi_link_train_funcs fdi_funcs;
>
> + /* display pll funcs */
> + struct drm_i915_dpll_funcs dpll_funcs;
> +
> /* Display functions */
> struct drm_i915_display_funcs display;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-08 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-08 0:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/21] i915/display: split and constify vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/21] drm/i915/pm: drop get_fifo_size vfunc Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 11:30 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: make update_wm take a dev_priv Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 1:17 ` David Airlie
2021-09-08 11:31 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 11:32 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/21] drm/i915/wm: move the update watermark wrapper to display side Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 9:33 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 20:40 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-09 14:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/21] drm/i915: split clock gating init from display vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 11:34 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/21] drm/i915: split watermark vfuncs " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 9:40 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/21] drm/i915: split color functions " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 9:46 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/21] drm/i915: split audio " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 9:48 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/21] drm/i915: split cdclk " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 9:52 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/21] drm/i915: split irq hotplug function " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:00 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/21] drm/i915: split fdi link training " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:02 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/21] drm/i915: split the dpll clock compute out " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:09 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-09-09 0:34 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/21] drm/i915: constify fdi link training vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:10 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 12:03 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/21] drm/i915: constify irq function vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:12 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/21] drm/i915: constify color " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:30 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/21] drm/i915: constify the audio " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:37 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/21] drm/i915: constify the dpll clock vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:38 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/21] drm/i915: constify the cdclk vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 11:56 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/21] drm/i915: drop unused function ptr and comments Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 11:36 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/21] drm/i915: constify display function vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 11:58 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/21] drm/i915: constify clock gating init vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 12:00 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 12:00 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/21] drm/i915: constify display wm vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 12:13 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 1:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915/display: split and constify vtable Patchwork
2021-09-08 1:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-09-08 12:04 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 1:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-08 7:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-09-08 12:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/21] " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dfr7517.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox