From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/21] drm/i915/wm: move the update watermark wrapper to display side.
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:33:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1dz76os.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210908003944.2972024-4-airlied@gmail.com>
On Wed, 08 Sep 2021, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
>
> A vague goal is to have the vfunc table be the api between
> wm and display, not having direction function calls cross
> the boundary.
>
> This aligns the legacy update_wm with the newer vfuncs.
>
> The comment probably needs to live somewhere else, it seems
> like it should live in the pm side though not the display side,
> but I brought it along for the ride.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 39 -------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index d95283bf2631..b495371c1889 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
We haven't been axing stuff out of intel_display.c so we could add
somethign else back! ;)
A new file for watermarks or display pm? Ville?
BR,
Jani.
> @@ -125,6 +125,46 @@ static void ilk_pfit_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> static void intel_modeset_setup_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx);
>
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_update_watermarks - update FIFO watermark values based on current modes
> + * @crtc: the #intel_crtc on which to compute the WM
> + *
> + * Calculate watermark values for the various WM regs based on current mode
> + * and plane configuration.
> + *
> + * There are several cases to deal with here:
> + * - normal (i.e. non-self-refresh)
> + * - self-refresh (SR) mode
> + * - lines are large relative to FIFO size (buffer can hold up to 2)
> + * - lines are small relative to FIFO size (buffer can hold more than 2
> + * lines), so need to account for TLB latency
> + *
> + * The normal calculation is:
> + * watermark = dotclock * bytes per pixel * latency
> + * where latency is platform & configuration dependent (we assume pessimal
> + * values here).
> + *
> + * The SR calculation is:
> + * watermark = (trunc(latency/line time)+1) * surface width *
> + * bytes per pixel
> + * where
> + * line time = htotal / dotclock
> + * surface width = hdisplay for normal plane and 64 for cursor
> + * and latency is assumed to be high, as above.
> + *
> + * The final value programmed to the register should always be rounded up,
> + * and include an extra 2 entries to account for clock crossings.
> + *
> + * We don't use the sprite, so we can ignore that. And on Crestline we have
> + * to set the non-SR watermarks to 8.
> + */
> +static void intel_update_watermarks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> + if (dev_priv->display.update_wm)
> + dev_priv->display.update_wm(dev_priv);
> +}
> +
> /* returns HPLL frequency in kHz */
> int vlv_get_hpll_vco(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 406baa49e6ad..4054c6f7a2f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -7132,45 +7132,6 @@ void ilk_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> !(intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, DISP_ARB_CTL) & DISP_FBC_WM_DIS);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * intel_update_watermarks - update FIFO watermark values based on current modes
> - * @crtc: the #intel_crtc on which to compute the WM
> - *
> - * Calculate watermark values for the various WM regs based on current mode
> - * and plane configuration.
> - *
> - * There are several cases to deal with here:
> - * - normal (i.e. non-self-refresh)
> - * - self-refresh (SR) mode
> - * - lines are large relative to FIFO size (buffer can hold up to 2)
> - * - lines are small relative to FIFO size (buffer can hold more than 2
> - * lines), so need to account for TLB latency
> - *
> - * The normal calculation is:
> - * watermark = dotclock * bytes per pixel * latency
> - * where latency is platform & configuration dependent (we assume pessimal
> - * values here).
> - *
> - * The SR calculation is:
> - * watermark = (trunc(latency/line time)+1) * surface width *
> - * bytes per pixel
> - * where
> - * line time = htotal / dotclock
> - * surface width = hdisplay for normal plane and 64 for cursor
> - * and latency is assumed to be high, as above.
> - *
> - * The final value programmed to the register should always be rounded up,
> - * and include an extra 2 entries to account for clock crossings.
> - *
> - * We don't use the sprite, so we can ignore that. And on Crestline we have
> - * to set the non-SR watermarks to 8.
> - */
> -void intel_update_watermarks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> - if (dev_priv->display.update_wm)
> - dev_priv->display.update_wm(dev_priv);
> -}
> -
> void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> u32 val;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> index 99bce0b4f5fb..990cdcaf85ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ struct skl_wm_level;
> void intel_init_clock_gating(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_suspend_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> int ilk_wm_max_level(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> -void intel_update_watermarks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_init_pm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_init_clock_gating_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_pm_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-08 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-08 0:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/21] i915/display: split and constify vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/21] drm/i915/pm: drop get_fifo_size vfunc Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 11:30 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: make update_wm take a dev_priv Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 1:17 ` David Airlie
2021-09-08 11:31 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 11:32 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/21] drm/i915/wm: move the update watermark wrapper to display side Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 9:33 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-09-08 20:40 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-09 14:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/21] drm/i915: split clock gating init from display vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 11:34 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/21] drm/i915: split watermark vfuncs " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 9:40 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/21] drm/i915: split color functions " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 9:46 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/21] drm/i915: split audio " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 9:48 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/21] drm/i915: split cdclk " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 9:52 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/21] drm/i915: split irq hotplug function " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:00 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/21] drm/i915: split fdi link training " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:02 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/21] drm/i915: split the dpll clock compute out " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:09 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-09 0:34 ` Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/21] drm/i915: constify fdi link training vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:10 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 12:03 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/21] drm/i915: constify irq function vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:12 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/21] drm/i915: constify color " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:30 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/21] drm/i915: constify the audio " Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:37 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/21] drm/i915: constify the dpll clock vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 10:38 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/21] drm/i915: constify the cdclk vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 11:56 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/21] drm/i915: drop unused function ptr and comments Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 11:36 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/21] drm/i915: constify display function vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 11:58 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/21] drm/i915: constify clock gating init vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 12:00 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 12:00 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/21] drm/i915: constify display wm vtable Dave Airlie
2021-09-08 12:13 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 1:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915/display: split and constify vtable Patchwork
2021-09-08 1:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-09-08 12:04 ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-08 1:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-08 7:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-09-08 12:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/21] " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r1dz76os.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox