Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Shankar\, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx\@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Varide, Nischal" <nischal.varide@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 6/9] drm/i915/mso: add splitter state readout for platforms that support it
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 18:55:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eeh8f3et.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485ac3466f8945afa89a79d4d979f0d1@intel.com>

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Jani Nikula
>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:22 PM
>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Varide, Nischal <nischal.varide@intel.com>
>> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 6/9] drm/i915/mso: add splitter state readout for
>> platforms that support it
>> 
>> Add splitter configuration to crtc state, and read it where supported. Also add
>> splitter state dumping. The stream splitter will be required for eDP MSO.
>> 
>> v3:
>> - Convert segment timings to full panel timings.
>> - Refer to splitter instead of mso in crtc state.
>> - Dump splitter state.
>> 
>> v2: Add warning for mso being enabled on pipes other than A.
>> 
>> Cc: Nischal Varide <nischal.varide@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c      | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  | 31 +++++++++++++++-
>>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  7 ++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |  2 +
>>  4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> index 3c4003605f93..c9098297b6ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> @@ -2132,6 +2132,41 @@ static void intel_ddi_power_up_lanes(struct
>> intel_encoder *encoder,
>>  	}
>>  }
>> 
>> +static void intel_ddi_mso_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> +				     struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config) {
>> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(pipe_config->uapi.crtc);
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> +	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>> +	u32 dss1;
>> +
>> +	if (!HAS_MSO(i915))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	dss1 = intel_de_read(i915, ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(pipe));
>> +
>> +	pipe_config->splitter.enable = dss1 & SPLITTER_ENABLE;
>> +	if (!pipe_config->splitter.enable)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/* Splitter enable is supported for pipe A only. */
>> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, pipe != PIPE_A)) {
>> +		pipe_config->splitter.enable = false;
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	switch (dss1 & SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_MASK) {
>> +	case SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_2_SEGMENT:
>> +		pipe_config->splitter.link_count = 2;
>> +		break;
>> +	case SPLITTER_CONFIGURATION_4_SEGMENT:
>> +		pipe_config->splitter.link_count = 4;
>> +		break;
>
> Should we have a default case as well just for sanity along with a WARN, since it's very
> unlikely that it gets hit.

Ok.

>
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	pipe_config->splitter.pixel_overlap =
>> +REG_FIELD_GET(OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK, dss1); }
>> +
>>  static void tgl_ddi_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>>  				  struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>  				  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, @@ -
>> 3322,6 +3357,8 @@ void intel_ddi_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>  		intel_ddi_read_func_ctl(encoder, pipe_config);
>>  	}
>> 
>> +	intel_ddi_mso_get_config(encoder, pipe_config);
>> +
>>  	pipe_config->has_audio =
>>  		intel_ddi_is_audio_enabled(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder);
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index beed08c00b6c..fe9985bd5786 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -4856,8 +4856,30 @@ static void intel_crtc_readout_derived_state(struct
>> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state
>>  		pipe_mode->crtc_clock /= 2;
>>  	}
>> 
>> -	intel_mode_from_crtc_timings(pipe_mode, pipe_mode);
>> -	intel_mode_from_crtc_timings(adjusted_mode, adjusted_mode);
>> +	if (crtc_state->splitter.enable) {
>
> We can just add an else if case to if (crtc_state->bigjoiner) {
>
> if (crtc_state->bigjoiner) {
> ...
> } else if (crtc_state->splitter.enable) {
> ...
> }
>
>> +		int n = crtc_state->splitter.link_count;
>> +		int overlap = crtc_state->splitter.pixel_overlap;
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * eDP MSO uses segment timings from EDID for transcoder
>> +		 * timings, but full mode for everything else.
>> +		 *
>> +		 * h_full = (h_segment - pixel_overlap) * link_count
>> +		 */
>> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hdisplay = (pipe_mode->crtc_hdisplay - overlap) *
>> n;
>> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hblank_start = (pipe_mode->crtc_hblank_start -
>> overlap) * n;
>> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hblank_end = (pipe_mode->crtc_hblank_end -
>> overlap) * n;
>> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hsync_start = (pipe_mode->crtc_hsync_start -
>> overlap) * n;
>> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hsync_end = (pipe_mode->crtc_hsync_end -
>> overlap) * n;
>> +		pipe_mode->crtc_htotal = (pipe_mode->crtc_htotal - overlap) * n;
>> +		pipe_mode->crtc_clock *= n;
>> +
>> +		intel_mode_from_crtc_timings(pipe_mode, pipe_mode);
>> +		intel_mode_from_crtc_timings(adjusted_mode, pipe_mode);
>
> Then we can keep above 2 out of the if conditions.

Note that the 2 lines in the if branches are *not* the same, and the
order matters!

I tried various alternatives, but to me this had the most clarity.

>
>> +	} else {
>> +		intel_mode_from_crtc_timings(pipe_mode, pipe_mode);
>> +		intel_mode_from_crtc_timings(adjusted_mode, adjusted_mode);
>> +	}
>> 
>>  	intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate(crtc_state);
>> 
>> @@ -8259,6 +8281,11 @@ static void intel_dump_pipe_config(const struct
>> intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
>>  		    pipe_config->bigjoiner_slave ? "slave" :
>>  		    pipe_config->bigjoiner ? "master" : "no");
>> 
>> +	drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "splitter: %s, link count %d, overlap %d\n",
>> +		    enableddisabled(pipe_config->splitter.enable),
>> +		    pipe_config->splitter.link_count,
>> +		    pipe_config->splitter.pixel_overlap);
>> +
>>  	if (pipe_config->has_pch_encoder)
>>  		intel_dump_m_n_config(pipe_config, "fdi",
>>  				      pipe_config->fdi_lanes,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>> index 71611b596c88..5564db512d22 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>> @@ -1161,6 +1161,13 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
>>  		u8 pipeline_full;
>>  		u16 flipline, vmin, vmax;
>>  	} vrr;
>> +
>> +	/* Stream Splitter for eDP MSO */
>> +	struct {
>> +		bool enable;
>> +		u8 link_count;
>> +		u8 pixel_overlap;
>> +	} splitter;
>
> For DSI which also has this in common along with MSO, may be we can take these link_count and
> pixel_overlap out of splitter which is more of a MSO feature. Thoughts ?

Ville suggested the same I think.

>
>>  };
>> 
>>  enum intel_pipe_crc_source {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index 9f55b5e6d8c9..3d8be7b021d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -1709,6 +1709,8 @@ tgl_stepping_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> 
>>  #define HAS_CSR(dev_priv)	(INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.has_csr)
>> 
>> +#define HAS_MSO(i915)		(INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 12)
>> +
>>  #define HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_runtime_pm)
>>  #define HAS_64BIT_RELOC(dev_priv) (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_64bit_reloc)
>> 
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-22 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-11 14:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/9] drm/i915/edp: enable eDP Multi-SST Operation (MSO) Jani Nikula
2021-02-11 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/9] drm/dp: add MSO related DPCD registers Jani Nikula
2021-02-22  5:25   ` Shankar, Uma
2021-02-11 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/9] drm/i915/edp: reject modes with dimensions other than fixed mode Jani Nikula
2021-02-22  5:36   ` Shankar, Uma
2021-02-11 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/9] drm/i915/edp: always add fixed mode to probed modes in ->get_modes() Jani Nikula
2021-02-22  5:50   ` Shankar, Uma
2021-02-11 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/9] drm/i915/edp: read sink MSO configuration for eDP 1.4+ Jani Nikula
2021-02-22  5:57   ` Shankar, Uma
2021-02-11 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 5/9] drm/i915/reg: add stream splitter configuration definitions Jani Nikula
2021-02-22  5:58   ` Shankar, Uma
2021-02-22 16:31     ` Jani Nikula
2021-02-11 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 6/9] drm/i915/mso: add splitter state readout for platforms that support it Jani Nikula
2021-02-22  9:09   ` Shankar, Uma
2021-02-22 16:55     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-02-22 18:11       ` Shankar, Uma
2021-03-02 10:25       ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-02 10:29         ` Shankar, Uma
2021-03-02 14:57         ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-03-02 17:20           ` Jani Nikula
2021-02-11 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 7/9] drm/i915/mso: add splitter state check Jani Nikula
2021-02-22  9:13   ` Shankar, Uma
2021-02-11 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 8/9] drm/i915/edp: modify fixed and downclock modes for MSO Jani Nikula
2021-02-22  9:21   ` Shankar, Uma
2021-02-11 14:52 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 9/9] drm/i915/edp: enable eDP MSO during link training Jani Nikula
2021-02-22 10:06   ` Shankar, Uma
2021-02-11 15:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915/edp: enable eDP Multi-SST Operation (MSO) Patchwork
2021-02-11 16:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-02-11 17:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87eeh8f3et.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=nischal.varide@intel.com \
    --cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox