From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/gt: Refactor mocs loops into single control macro
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:35:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ftiqxswu.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191112223600.30993-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> We repeatedly (and more so in future) use the same looping construct
> over the mocs definition table to setup the register state. Refactor the
> loop construct into a reusable macro.
>
> add/remove: 2/1 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 113/-330 (-217)
> Function old new delta
> intel_mocs_init_engine.cold - 71 +71
> offset - 28 +28
> __func__ 17273 17287 +14
> intel_mocs_init 143 113 -30
> mocs_register.isra 91 - -91
> intel_mocs_init_engine 503 294 -209
Effective diet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Could not spot anything off at this round and even pretty
defines this time.
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 133 +++++++++++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 19 ++--
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> index e6f3f36a3988..47d16a242183 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> @@ -329,27 +329,6 @@ static bool get_mocs_settings(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static i915_reg_t mocs_register(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int index)
> -{
> - switch (engine->id) {
> - case RCS0:
> - return GEN9_GFX_MOCS(index);
> - case VCS0:
> - return GEN9_MFX0_MOCS(index);
> - case BCS0:
> - return GEN9_BLT_MOCS(index);
> - case VECS0:
> - return GEN9_VEBOX_MOCS(index);
> - case VCS1:
> - return GEN9_MFX1_MOCS(index);
> - case VCS2:
> - return GEN11_MFX2_MOCS(index);
> - default:
> - MISSING_CASE(engine->id);
> - return INVALID_MMIO_REG;
> - }
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Get control_value from MOCS entry taking into account when it's not used:
> * I915_MOCS_PTE's value is returned in this case.
> @@ -357,29 +336,47 @@ static i915_reg_t mocs_register(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int index)
> static u32 get_entry_control(const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
> unsigned int index)
> {
> - if (table->table[index].used)
> + if (index < table->size && table->table[index].used)
> return table->table[index].control_value;
>
> return table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value;
> }
>
> -static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> - const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
> +#define for_each_mocs(mocs, t, i) \
> + for (i = 0; \
> + i < (t)->n_entries ? (mocs = get_entry_control((t), i)), 1 : 0;\
> + i++)
> +
> +static void __init_mocs_table(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> + const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
> + u32 addr)
> {
> - struct intel_uncore *uncore = engine->uncore;
> - u32 unused_value = table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value;
> unsigned int i;
> + u32 mocs;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < table->size; i++)
> - intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore,
> - mocs_register(engine, i),
> - get_entry_control(table, i));
> + for_each_mocs(mocs, table, i)
> + intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, _MMIO(addr + i * 4), mocs);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 mocs_offset(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +{
> + static const u32 offset[] = {
> + [RCS0] = __GEN9_RCS0_MOCS0,
> + [VCS0] = __GEN9_VCS0_MOCS0,
> + [VCS1] = __GEN9_VCS1_MOCS0,
> + [VECS0] = __GEN9_VECS0_MOCS0,
> + [BCS0] = __GEN9_BCS0_MOCS0,
> + [VCS2] = __GEN11_VCS2_MOCS0,
> + };
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(engine->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(offset));
> + return offset[engine->id];
> +}
>
> - /* All remaining entries are unused */
> - for (; i < table->n_entries; i++)
> - intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore,
> - mocs_register(engine, i),
> - unused_value);
> +static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> + const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
> +{
> + __init_mocs_table(engine->uncore, table, mocs_offset(engine));
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -389,7 +386,7 @@ static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> static u16 get_entry_l3cc(const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
> unsigned int index)
> {
> - if (table->table[index].used)
> + if (index < table->size && table->table[index].used)
> return table->table[index].l3cc_value;
>
> return table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].l3cc_value;
> @@ -400,37 +397,23 @@ static inline u32 l3cc_combine(u16 low, u16 high)
> return low | (u32)high << 16;
> }
>
> +#define for_each_l3cc(l3cc, t, i) \
> + for (i = 0; \
> + i < ((t)->n_entries + 1) / 2 ? \
> + (l3cc = l3cc_combine(get_entry_l3cc((t), 2 * i), \
> + get_entry_l3cc((t), 2 * i + 1))), 1 : \
> + 0; \
> + i++)
> +
> static void init_l3cc_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
> {
> struct intel_uncore *uncore = engine->uncore;
> - u16 unused_value = table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].l3cc_value;
> unsigned int i;
> + u32 l3cc;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < table->size / 2; i++) {
> - u16 low = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i);
> - u16 high = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i + 1);
> -
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> - GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
> - l3cc_combine(low, high));
> - }
> -
> - /* Odd table size - 1 left over */
> - if (table->size & 1) {
> - u16 low = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i);
> -
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> - GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
> - l3cc_combine(low, unused_value));
> - i++;
> - }
> -
> - /* All remaining entries are also unused */
> - for (; i < table->n_entries / 2; i++)
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> - GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
> - l3cc_combine(unused_value, unused_value));
> + for_each_l3cc(l3cc, table, i)
> + intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i), l3cc);
> }
>
> void intel_mocs_init_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> @@ -451,11 +434,14 @@ void intel_mocs_init_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> init_l3cc_table(engine, &table);
> }
>
> -static void intel_mocs_init_global(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +static u32 global_mocs_offset(void)
> +{
> + return i915_mmio_reg_offset(GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(0));
> +}
> +
> +static void init_global_mocs(struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> - struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
> struct drm_i915_mocs_table table;
> - unsigned int index;
>
> /*
> * LLC and eDRAM control values are not applicable to dgfx
> @@ -463,29 +449,14 @@ static void intel_mocs_init_global(struct intel_gt *gt)
> if (IS_DGFX(gt->i915))
> return;
>
> - GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS_REGISTERS(gt->i915));
> -
> if (!get_mocs_settings(gt->i915, &table))
> return;
>
> - for (index = 0; index < table.size; index++)
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> - GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(index),
> - table.table[index].control_value);
> -
> - /*
> - * Ok, now set the unused entries to the invalid entry (index 0). These
> - * entries are officially undefined and no contract for the contents and
> - * settings is given for these entries.
> - */
> - for (; index < table.n_entries; index++)
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> - GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(index),
> - table.table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value);
> + __init_mocs_table(gt->uncore, &table, global_mocs_offset());
> }
>
> void intel_mocs_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> if (HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS_REGISTERS(gt->i915))
> - intel_mocs_init_global(gt);
> + init_global_mocs(gt);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 2ffcc21670b7..0960ea0b5a66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -11688,13 +11688,18 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> /* MOCS (Memory Object Control State) registers */
> #define GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i) _MMIO(0xb020 + (i) * 4) /* L3 Cache Control */
>
> -#define GEN9_GFX_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0xc800 + (i) * 4) /* Graphics MOCS registers */
> -#define GEN9_MFX0_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0xc900 + (i) * 4) /* Media 0 MOCS registers */
> -#define GEN9_MFX1_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0xca00 + (i) * 4) /* Media 1 MOCS registers */
> -#define GEN9_VEBOX_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0xcb00 + (i) * 4) /* Video MOCS registers */
> -#define GEN9_BLT_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0xcc00 + (i) * 4) /* Blitter MOCS registers */
> -/* Media decoder 2 MOCS registers */
> -#define GEN11_MFX2_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0x10000 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN9_RCS0_MOCS0 0xc800
> +#define GEN9_GFX_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN9_RCS0_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN9_VCS0_MOCS0 0xc900
> +#define GEN9_MFX0_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN9_VCS0_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN9_VCS1_MOCS0 0xca00
> +#define GEN9_MFX1_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN9_VCS1_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN9_VECS0_MOCS0 0xcb00
> +#define GEN9_VEBOX_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN9_VECS0_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN9_BCS0_MOCS0 0xcc00
> +#define GEN9_BLT_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN9_BCS0_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN11_VCS2_MOCS0 0x10000
> +#define GEN11_MFX2_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN11_VCS2_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
>
> #define GEN10_SCRATCH_LNCF2 _MMIO(0xb0a0)
> #define PMFLUSHDONE_LNICRSDROP (1 << 20)
> --
> 2.24.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/gt: Refactor mocs loops into single control macro
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:35:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ftiqxswu.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191114173529.4yohyK8k5OxMrzqSkV5LVvRx9dGqgzCahsHvMdfiqSw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191112223600.30993-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> We repeatedly (and more so in future) use the same looping construct
> over the mocs definition table to setup the register state. Refactor the
> loop construct into a reusable macro.
>
> add/remove: 2/1 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 113/-330 (-217)
> Function old new delta
> intel_mocs_init_engine.cold - 71 +71
> offset - 28 +28
> __func__ 17273 17287 +14
> intel_mocs_init 143 113 -30
> mocs_register.isra 91 - -91
> intel_mocs_init_engine 503 294 -209
Effective diet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Could not spot anything off at this round and even pretty
defines this time.
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 133 +++++++++++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 19 ++--
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> index e6f3f36a3988..47d16a242183 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> @@ -329,27 +329,6 @@ static bool get_mocs_settings(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static i915_reg_t mocs_register(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int index)
> -{
> - switch (engine->id) {
> - case RCS0:
> - return GEN9_GFX_MOCS(index);
> - case VCS0:
> - return GEN9_MFX0_MOCS(index);
> - case BCS0:
> - return GEN9_BLT_MOCS(index);
> - case VECS0:
> - return GEN9_VEBOX_MOCS(index);
> - case VCS1:
> - return GEN9_MFX1_MOCS(index);
> - case VCS2:
> - return GEN11_MFX2_MOCS(index);
> - default:
> - MISSING_CASE(engine->id);
> - return INVALID_MMIO_REG;
> - }
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Get control_value from MOCS entry taking into account when it's not used:
> * I915_MOCS_PTE's value is returned in this case.
> @@ -357,29 +336,47 @@ static i915_reg_t mocs_register(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int index)
> static u32 get_entry_control(const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
> unsigned int index)
> {
> - if (table->table[index].used)
> + if (index < table->size && table->table[index].used)
> return table->table[index].control_value;
>
> return table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value;
> }
>
> -static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> - const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
> +#define for_each_mocs(mocs, t, i) \
> + for (i = 0; \
> + i < (t)->n_entries ? (mocs = get_entry_control((t), i)), 1 : 0;\
> + i++)
> +
> +static void __init_mocs_table(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> + const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
> + u32 addr)
> {
> - struct intel_uncore *uncore = engine->uncore;
> - u32 unused_value = table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value;
> unsigned int i;
> + u32 mocs;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < table->size; i++)
> - intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore,
> - mocs_register(engine, i),
> - get_entry_control(table, i));
> + for_each_mocs(mocs, table, i)
> + intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, _MMIO(addr + i * 4), mocs);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 mocs_offset(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +{
> + static const u32 offset[] = {
> + [RCS0] = __GEN9_RCS0_MOCS0,
> + [VCS0] = __GEN9_VCS0_MOCS0,
> + [VCS1] = __GEN9_VCS1_MOCS0,
> + [VECS0] = __GEN9_VECS0_MOCS0,
> + [BCS0] = __GEN9_BCS0_MOCS0,
> + [VCS2] = __GEN11_VCS2_MOCS0,
> + };
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(engine->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(offset));
> + return offset[engine->id];
> +}
>
> - /* All remaining entries are unused */
> - for (; i < table->n_entries; i++)
> - intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore,
> - mocs_register(engine, i),
> - unused_value);
> +static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> + const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
> +{
> + __init_mocs_table(engine->uncore, table, mocs_offset(engine));
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -389,7 +386,7 @@ static void init_mocs_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> static u16 get_entry_l3cc(const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table,
> unsigned int index)
> {
> - if (table->table[index].used)
> + if (index < table->size && table->table[index].used)
> return table->table[index].l3cc_value;
>
> return table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].l3cc_value;
> @@ -400,37 +397,23 @@ static inline u32 l3cc_combine(u16 low, u16 high)
> return low | (u32)high << 16;
> }
>
> +#define for_each_l3cc(l3cc, t, i) \
> + for (i = 0; \
> + i < ((t)->n_entries + 1) / 2 ? \
> + (l3cc = l3cc_combine(get_entry_l3cc((t), 2 * i), \
> + get_entry_l3cc((t), 2 * i + 1))), 1 : \
> + 0; \
> + i++)
> +
> static void init_l3cc_table(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> const struct drm_i915_mocs_table *table)
> {
> struct intel_uncore *uncore = engine->uncore;
> - u16 unused_value = table->table[I915_MOCS_PTE].l3cc_value;
> unsigned int i;
> + u32 l3cc;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < table->size / 2; i++) {
> - u16 low = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i);
> - u16 high = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i + 1);
> -
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> - GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
> - l3cc_combine(low, high));
> - }
> -
> - /* Odd table size - 1 left over */
> - if (table->size & 1) {
> - u16 low = get_entry_l3cc(table, 2 * i);
> -
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> - GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
> - l3cc_combine(low, unused_value));
> - i++;
> - }
> -
> - /* All remaining entries are also unused */
> - for (; i < table->n_entries / 2; i++)
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> - GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i),
> - l3cc_combine(unused_value, unused_value));
> + for_each_l3cc(l3cc, table, i)
> + intel_uncore_write_fw(uncore, GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i), l3cc);
> }
>
> void intel_mocs_init_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> @@ -451,11 +434,14 @@ void intel_mocs_init_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> init_l3cc_table(engine, &table);
> }
>
> -static void intel_mocs_init_global(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +static u32 global_mocs_offset(void)
> +{
> + return i915_mmio_reg_offset(GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(0));
> +}
> +
> +static void init_global_mocs(struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> - struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
> struct drm_i915_mocs_table table;
> - unsigned int index;
>
> /*
> * LLC and eDRAM control values are not applicable to dgfx
> @@ -463,29 +449,14 @@ static void intel_mocs_init_global(struct intel_gt *gt)
> if (IS_DGFX(gt->i915))
> return;
>
> - GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS_REGISTERS(gt->i915));
> -
> if (!get_mocs_settings(gt->i915, &table))
> return;
>
> - for (index = 0; index < table.size; index++)
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> - GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(index),
> - table.table[index].control_value);
> -
> - /*
> - * Ok, now set the unused entries to the invalid entry (index 0). These
> - * entries are officially undefined and no contract for the contents and
> - * settings is given for these entries.
> - */
> - for (; index < table.n_entries; index++)
> - intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> - GEN12_GLOBAL_MOCS(index),
> - table.table[I915_MOCS_PTE].control_value);
> + __init_mocs_table(gt->uncore, &table, global_mocs_offset());
> }
>
> void intel_mocs_init(struct intel_gt *gt)
> {
> if (HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS_REGISTERS(gt->i915))
> - intel_mocs_init_global(gt);
> + init_global_mocs(gt);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 2ffcc21670b7..0960ea0b5a66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -11688,13 +11688,18 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> /* MOCS (Memory Object Control State) registers */
> #define GEN9_LNCFCMOCS(i) _MMIO(0xb020 + (i) * 4) /* L3 Cache Control */
>
> -#define GEN9_GFX_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0xc800 + (i) * 4) /* Graphics MOCS registers */
> -#define GEN9_MFX0_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0xc900 + (i) * 4) /* Media 0 MOCS registers */
> -#define GEN9_MFX1_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0xca00 + (i) * 4) /* Media 1 MOCS registers */
> -#define GEN9_VEBOX_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0xcb00 + (i) * 4) /* Video MOCS registers */
> -#define GEN9_BLT_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0xcc00 + (i) * 4) /* Blitter MOCS registers */
> -/* Media decoder 2 MOCS registers */
> -#define GEN11_MFX2_MOCS(i) _MMIO(0x10000 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN9_RCS0_MOCS0 0xc800
> +#define GEN9_GFX_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN9_RCS0_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN9_VCS0_MOCS0 0xc900
> +#define GEN9_MFX0_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN9_VCS0_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN9_VCS1_MOCS0 0xca00
> +#define GEN9_MFX1_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN9_VCS1_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN9_VECS0_MOCS0 0xcb00
> +#define GEN9_VEBOX_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN9_VECS0_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN9_BCS0_MOCS0 0xcc00
> +#define GEN9_BLT_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN9_BCS0_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
> +#define __GEN11_VCS2_MOCS0 0x10000
> +#define GEN11_MFX2_MOCS(i) _MMIO(__GEN11_VCS2_MOCS0 + (i) * 4)
>
> #define GEN10_SCRATCH_LNCF2 _MMIO(0xb0a0)
> #define PMFLUSHDONE_LNICRSDROP (1 << 20)
> --
> 2.24.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 22:35 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/gt: Set unused mocs entry to follow PTE on tgl as on all others Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 22:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/gt: Tidy up debug-warns for the mocs control table Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 22:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-14 17:33 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-14 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-12 22:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/gt: Refactor mocs loops into single control macro Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 22:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-14 17:35 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2019-11-14 17:35 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-12 22:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/selftests: Add coverage of mocs registers Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 22:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-11-12 23:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915/gt: Set unused mocs entry to follow PTE on tgl as on all others Patchwork
2019-11-12 23:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-12 23:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-11-12 23:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-13 11:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-11-13 11:16 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-13 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-13 16:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-14 17:33 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-11-14 17:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Mika Kuoppala
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-10-22 11:51 Chris Wilson
2019-10-22 11:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/gt: Refactor mocs loops into single control macro Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ftiqxswu.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox