From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/perf: Use helpers to process reports w.r.t. OA buffer size
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:07:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtb14vxk.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YyIbMqyKJaGlP+ws@unerlige-ril>
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:19:30 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 09:04:10AM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 13:41:42 -0700, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Hi Umesh,
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> >> index 6fc4f0d8fc5a..bbf1c574f393 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> >> @@ -385,6 +385,21 @@ static struct ctl_table_header *sysctl_header;
> >>
> >> static enum hrtimer_restart oa_poll_check_timer_cb(struct hrtimer *hrtimer);
> >>
> >> +static u32 _oa_taken(struct i915_perf_stream * stream, u32 tail, u32 head)
> >
> > nit: no space between * and stream.
> >
> >> +{
> >> + u32 size = stream->oa_buffer.vma->size;
> >> +
> >> + return tail >= head ? tail - head : size - (head - tail);
> >> +}
> >
> > If we are doing this we should probably eliminate references to OA_TAKEN
> > which serves an identical purpose (I think there is one remaining
> > reference) and also delete OA_TAKEN #define.
> >
> >> +
> >> +static u32 _rewind_tail(struct i915_perf_stream * stream, u32 relative_hw_tail,
> >> + u32 rewind_delta)
> >> +{
> >> + return rewind_delta > relative_hw_tail ?
> >> + stream->oa_buffer.vma->size - (rewind_delta - relative_hw_tail) :
> >> + relative_hw_tail - rewind_delta;
> >> +}
> >
> > Also are we really saying here that we are supporting non-power-of-2 OA
> > buffer sizes? Because if we stayed with power-of-2 sizes the expression
> > above are nice and elegant and actually closer to the previous code being
> > changed in this patch. For example:
> >
> > #include <linux/circ_buf.h>
> >
> > static u32 _oa_taken(struct i915_perf_stream *stream, u32 tail, u32 head)
> > {
> > return CIRC_CNT(tail, head, stream->oa_buffer.vma->size);
> > }
> >
> > static u32 _rewind_tail(struct i915_perf_stream *stream, u32 relative_hw_tail,
> > u32 rewind_delta)
> > {
> > return CIRC_CNT(relative_hw_tail, rewind_delta, stream->oa_buffer.vma->size);
> > }
> >
> > Note that for power-of-2 sizes the two functions above are identical but we
> > should keep them separate for clarity (as is done in the patch) since they
> > are serving two different functions in the OA code.
> >
> > Also another assumption in the code seems to be:
> >
> > stream->oa_buffer.vma->size == OA_BUFFER_SIZE
> >
> > which I am pretty sure will not hold for arbitrary non-power-of-2 OA buffer
> > sizes? So we might as well stick with power-of-2 sizes and change later in
> > a separate patch only if needed?
>
> Most changes here are related to the OA buffer size issue and that is
> specific to xehpsdv where the size is not a power of 2. I am thinking of
> dropping these changes in the next revision since DG2 is fixed and OA
> buffer sizes are power of 2.
In the code stream->oa_buffer.vma->size and OA_BUFFER_SIZE are both used,
if we want to clean that up and only use stream->oa_buffer.vma->size, we
could still do soemthing like I suggested with just power-of-2 sizes and
keep this patch. If we ever have to support non-power-of-2 sizes in the
future we'll just need to change _oa_taken and _rewind_tail
functions. Anyway your call.
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-14 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-23 20:41 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/19] Add DG2 OA support Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/perf: Fix OA filtering logic for GuC mode Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 14:33 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-06 17:39 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 18:39 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-14 22:26 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-14 23:13 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-15 22:49 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-20 3:22 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-22 3:51 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-22 11:05 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-09 23:47 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-13 3:08 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-14 23:37 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-14 23:36 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-22 3:44 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-22 3:49 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/perf: Add OA formats for DG2 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 19:35 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-06 19:46 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 19:59 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-13 15:40 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-14 20:54 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-14 21:16 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915/perf: Fix noa wait predication " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-20 0:35 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/perf: Determine gen12 oa ctx offset at runtime Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 19:48 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-06 20:35 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-08 18:32 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-08 23:04 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/perf: Enable commands per clock reporting in OA Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 19:51 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-14 0:19 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-15 0:04 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/perf: Use helpers to process reports w.r.t. OA buffer size Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-14 16:04 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-14 18:19 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-14 19:07 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/perf: Simply use stream->ctx Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 19:52 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915/perf: Move gt-specific data from i915->perf to gt->perf Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 19:54 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-14 18:20 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/perf: Replace gt->perf.lock with stream->lock for file ops Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-14 19:04 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/perf: Use gt-specific ggtt for OA and noa-wait buffers Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 19:56 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-06 20:28 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 20:31 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915/perf: Store a pointer to oa_format in oa_buffer Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-06 19:56 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2022-09-14 20:43 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/perf: Parse 64bit report header formats correctly Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-16 0:47 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/perf: Add Wa_16010703925:dg2 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-16 1:08 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/perf: Add Wa_1608133521:dg2 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-08-29 14:04 ` Jani Nikula
2022-09-16 1:21 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-16 18:19 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915/perf: Add Wa_1508761755:dg2 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-16 1:34 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/perf: Apply Wa_18013179988 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-16 5:16 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-16 15:22 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-16 19:04 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-16 18:56 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-16 19:57 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-16 20:25 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-16 21:00 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-19 21:21 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-20 1:24 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/perf: Save/restore EU flex counters across reset Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-16 5:40 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/guc: Support OA when Wa_16011777198 is enabled Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-09-16 21:41 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-09-16 21:48 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-08-23 20:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/perf: Enable OA for DG2 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-08-23 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/perf: Add OA formats " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-08-23 21:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/perf: Enable OA " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-08-23 22:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add DG2 OA support (rev2) Patchwork
2022-08-23 22:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-23 0:03 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/19] Add DG2 OA support Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2022-08-23 0:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/perf: Use helpers to process reports w.r.t. OA buffer size Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mtb14vxk.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox