From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ville.syrjala@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 1/4] drm/i915/quirks: Add quirk for 480MHz CDCLK step
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 12:03:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tu19z20l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230102062005.720964-2-chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
On Mon, 02 Jan 2023, Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com> wrote:
> A new CDCLK step of 480MHz has been added on SKUs that has a
> RPL-U device id. This is done to support 120Hz displays with
> more efficiency.
>
> RPL-U device ids are currently added within the RPL-P sub
> platform. It seems to be an overkill to add a separate sub
> platform just to support this change. Therefore, quirks
> are a good way to achieve the same.
The thing is, this part is *not* a quirk. It's basic enabling for RPL-U.
If you start conflating quirks and basic enabling to avoid overkill,
you're eventually going to end up in all kinds of trouble with
maintenance.
BR,
Jani.
>
> BSpec: 55409
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.c
> index 6e48d3bcdfec..0a30499835b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,16 @@ static void quirk_no_pps_backlight_power_hook(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> drm_info(&i915->drm, "Applying no pps backlight power quirk\n");
> }
>
> +/*
> + * A new step of 480MHz has been added on SKUs that have a RPL-U device id.
> + * This particular step is to better support 120Hz panels.
> + */
> +static void quirk_480mhz_cdclk_step_hook(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + intel_set_quirk(i915, QUIRK_480MHZ_CDCLK_STEP);
> + drm_info(&i915->drm, "Applying 480MHz CDCLK step quirk\n");
> +}
> +
> struct intel_quirk {
> int device;
> int subsystem_vendor;
> @@ -199,6 +209,10 @@ static struct intel_quirk intel_quirks[] = {
> /* ECS Liva Q2 */
> { 0x3185, 0x1019, 0xa94d, quirk_increase_ddi_disabled_time },
> { 0x3184, 0x1019, 0xa94d, quirk_increase_ddi_disabled_time },
> + /* RPL-U */
> + { 0xA7A1, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_480mhz_cdclk_step_hook },
> + { 0xA721, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_480mhz_cdclk_step_hook },
> + { 0xA7A9, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_480mhz_cdclk_step_hook },
> };
>
> void intel_init_quirks(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.h
> index 10a4d163149f..71e05684f5f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_quirks.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ enum intel_quirk_id {
> QUIRK_INVERT_BRIGHTNESS,
> QUIRK_LVDS_SSC_DISABLE,
> QUIRK_NO_PPS_BACKLIGHT_POWER_HOOK,
> + QUIRK_480MHZ_CDCLK_STEP,
> };
>
> void intel_init_quirks(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-02 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-02 6:20 [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/4] Add new CDCLK step for RPL-U Chaitanya Kumar Borah
2023-01-02 6:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 1/4] drm/i915/quirks: Add quirk for 480MHz CDCLK step Chaitanya Kumar Borah
2023-01-02 10:03 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-01-02 10:39 ` Jani Nikula
2023-01-07 5:52 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2023-01-02 6:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 2/4] drm/i915/display: Add 480 MHz CDCLK steps for RPL-U Chaitanya Kumar Borah
2023-01-02 10:05 ` Jani Nikula
2023-01-02 6:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 3/4] drm/i915: Initialize intel quirks before CDCLK initialization Chaitanya Kumar Borah
2023-01-02 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2023-01-02 6:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/4] drm/i915: Apply CDCLK quirk only on QS parts Chaitanya Kumar Borah
2023-01-02 10:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Add new CDCLK step for RPL-U (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tu19z20l.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox