From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com,
imre.deak@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv7] drm/i915/dp: change aux_ctl reg read to polling read
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 15:27:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wn62wht2.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221221033209.1284435-1-arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> wrote:
> The busy timeout logic checks for the AUX BUSY, then waits for the
> timeout period and then after timeout reads the register for BUSY or
> Success.
> Instead replace interrupt with polling so as to read the AUX CTL
> register often before the timeout period. Looks like there might be some
> issue with interrupt-on-read. Hence changing the logic to polling read.
>
> v2: replace interrupt with polling read
> v3: use usleep_rang instead of msleep, updated commit msg
> v4: use intel_wait_for_regiter internal function
> v5: use __intel_de_wait_for_register with 500us slow and 10ms fast timeout
> v6: check return value of __intel_de_wait_for_register
> v7: using default 2us for intel_de_wait_for_register
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Pushed to drm-intel-next, thanks for the patch.
How about replacing the other open coded try loop in intel_dp_aux_xfer()
with intel_de_wait_for_register() too?
BR,
Jani.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> index 91c93c93e5fc..5a176bfb10a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> @@ -41,20 +41,16 @@ intel_dp_aux_wait_done(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> i915_reg_t ch_ctl = intel_dp->aux_ch_ctl_reg(intel_dp);
> const unsigned int timeout_ms = 10;
> u32 status;
> - bool done;
> -
> -#define C (((status = intel_de_read_notrace(i915, ch_ctl)) & DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY) == 0)
> - done = wait_event_timeout(i915->display.gmbus.wait_queue, C,
> - msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(timeout_ms));
> + int ret;
>
> - /* just trace the final value */
> - trace_i915_reg_rw(false, ch_ctl, status, sizeof(status), true);
> + ret = __intel_de_wait_for_register(i915, ch_ctl,
> + DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SEND_BUSY, 0,
> + 2, timeout_ms, &status);
>
> - if (!done)
> + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> drm_err(&i915->drm,
> "%s: did not complete or timeout within %ums (status 0x%08x)\n",
> intel_dp->aux.name, timeout_ms, status);
> -#undef C
>
> return status;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-24 7:09 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry include sw delay Arun R Murthy
2022-11-24 7:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for " Patchwork
2022-11-24 8:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-25 15:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Imre Deak
2022-12-01 6:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv2] drm/i915/dp: Change aux_ctl reg read to polling read Arun R Murthy
2022-12-05 10:38 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-07 5:23 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-01 7:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry include sw delay (rev2) Patchwork
2022-12-01 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-12-01 17:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-12-09 8:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCHv3] drm/i915/dp: Change aux_ctl reg read to polling read Arun R Murthy
2022-12-09 10:45 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-13 5:44 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-13 8:08 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-09 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry include sw delay (rev3) Patchwork
2022-12-09 15:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-12-14 3:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv4] drm/i915/dp: change aux_ctl reg read to polling read Arun R Murthy
2022-12-14 5:36 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-14 9:29 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-14 5:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry include sw delay (rev4) Patchwork
2022-12-14 16:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv5] drm/i915/dp: change aux_ctl reg read to polling read Arun R Murthy
2022-12-15 9:05 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-14 18:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry include sw delay (rev5) Patchwork
2022-12-14 18:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-12-15 9:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv6] drm/i915/dp: change aux_ctl reg read to polling read Arun R Murthy
2022-12-15 10:30 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-15 10:37 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-15 10:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry include sw delay (rev6) Patchwork
2022-12-15 10:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-12-15 11:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv6] drm/i915/dp: change aux_ctl reg read to polling read Arun R Murthy
2022-12-19 10:17 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-20 16:02 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-20 16:54 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-20 20:58 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-15 14:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry include sw delay (rev8) Patchwork
2022-12-15 14:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-12-16 13:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2022-12-21 3:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCHv7] drm/i915/dp: change aux_ctl reg read to polling read Arun R Murthy
2023-01-04 13:27 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-01-04 15:21 ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-12-22 1:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: wait on timeout before retry include sw delay (rev9) Patchwork
2022-12-22 5:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wn62wht2.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox