From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:35:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <939bbb3c-9814-a6e7-19b3-7c0d6b068ade@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210910201030.3436066-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
On 10/09/2021 21:10, Matt Roper wrote:
> Now that the reference to the shadow table is stored within the uncore,
> we don't need to generate separate fwtable, gen11_fwtable, and
> gen12_fwtable variants of the register write functions; a single
> 'fwtable' implementation will work for all of those platforms now.
>
> While consolidating the functions, gen11/gen12 pick up a
> NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check that they didn't have before, allowing them to
> bypass a lot of forcewake/shadow checking for non-GT registers (e.g.,
> display). However since these later platforms also introduce media
> engines at higher MMIO offsets, the definition of NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() is
> extended to also consider register offsets above GEN11_BSD_RING_BASE.
>
> v2:
> - Restore NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE(), but extend it for compatibility with the
> gen11+ platforms by also passing offsets above GEN11_BSD_RING_BASE.
> (Chris, Tvrtko)
>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 61 ++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index 4c6898746d10..bfb2a6337f9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -851,7 +851,10 @@ void assert_forcewakes_active(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> }
>
> /* We give fast paths for the really cool registers */
> -#define NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE(reg) ((reg) < 0x40000)
> +#define NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE(reg) ({ \
> + u32 __reg = (reg); \
> + __reg < 0x40000 || __reg >= GEN11_BSD_RING_BASE; \
> +})
>
> static int fw_range_cmp(u32 offset, const struct intel_forcewake_range *entry)
> {
> @@ -1071,27 +1074,10 @@ static const struct intel_forcewake_range __chv_fw_ranges[] = {
> };
>
> #define __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
> -({ \
> - enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
> - if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((offset)) && !is_shadowed(uncore, offset)) \
> - __fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, offset); \
> - __fwd; \
> -})
> -
> -#define __gen11_fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
> ({ \
> enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
> const u32 __offset = (offset); \
> - if (!is_shadowed(uncore, __offset)) \
> - __fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, __offset); \
> - __fwd; \
> -})
> -
> -#define __gen12_fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
> -({ \
> - enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
> - const u32 __offset = (offset); \
> - if (!is_shadowed(uncore, __offset)) \
> + if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((__offset)) && !is_shadowed(uncore, __offset)) \
> __fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, __offset); \
> __fwd; \
> })
> @@ -1675,34 +1661,29 @@ __gen6_write(8)
> __gen6_write(16)
> __gen6_write(32)
>
> -#define __gen_write(func, x) \
> +#define __gen_fwtable_write(x) \
> static void \
> -func##_write##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
> +fwtable_write##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
> enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
> GEN6_WRITE_HEADER; \
> - fw_engine = __##func##_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
> + fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
> if (fw_engine) \
> __force_wake_auto(uncore, fw_engine); \
> __raw_uncore_write##x(uncore, reg, val); \
> GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
> }
>
> -#define __gen_reg_write_funcs(func) \
> -static enum forcewake_domains \
> -func##_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg) { \
> - return __##func##_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg)); \
> -} \
> -\
> -__gen_write(func, 8) \
> -__gen_write(func, 16) \
> -__gen_write(func, 32)
> -
> +static enum forcewake_domains
> +fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg)
> +{
> + return __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg));
> +}
>
> -__gen_reg_write_funcs(gen12_fwtable);
> -__gen_reg_write_funcs(gen11_fwtable);
> -__gen_reg_write_funcs(fwtable);
> +__gen_fwtable_write(8)
> +__gen_fwtable_write(16)
> +__gen_fwtable_write(32)
>
> -#undef __gen_reg_write_funcs
> +#undef __gen_fwtable_write
> #undef GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER
> #undef GEN6_WRITE_HEADER
>
> @@ -2080,22 +2061,22 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
> if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 55)) {
> ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __dg2_fw_ranges);
> ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
> - ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
> + ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
> ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
> } else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50)) {
> ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __xehp_fw_ranges);
> ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
> - ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
> + ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
> ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
> } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12) {
> ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen12_fw_ranges);
> ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
> - ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
> + ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
> ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
> } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 11) {
> ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen11_fw_ranges);
> ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen11_shadowed_regs);
> - ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
> + ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
> ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
> } else if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, 9, 10)) {
> ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen9_fw_ranges);
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-21 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 20:10 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/6] i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table Matt Roper
2021-09-10 20:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable Matt Roper
2021-09-21 13:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-10 20:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915/uncore: Associate shadow table with uncore Matt Roper
2021-09-21 13:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-10 20:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/uncore: Replace gen8 write functions with general fwtable Matt Roper
2021-09-21 13:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-10 20:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers Matt Roper
2021-09-21 14:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-09-10 20:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers Matt Roper
2021-09-21 14:40 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-21 17:36 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-09-10 20:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2-specific shadow register table Matt Roper
2021-09-21 22:35 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-09-10 20:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table (rev2) Patchwork
2021-09-10 20:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-10 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-10 21:09 ` Matt Roper
2021-09-21 22:18 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-09-21 16:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table (rev3) Patchwork
2021-09-21 16:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-21 17:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-21 21:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-21 22:05 ` Matt Roper
2021-09-21 22:24 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-09-21 22:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-22 0:19 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=939bbb3c-9814-a6e7-19b3-7c0d6b068ade@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox