From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/6] drm/i915/psr: Implement Wa_14015648006
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:44:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <996f787923f4678fd7fd2dd80e82acdc88dd82ee.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZCQkpHc0gRzWRm5r@intel.com>
On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 14:44 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:45:29PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> > PSR WM optimization should be disabled based on any wm level being
> > disabled. Also same WA should be applied for ICL as well.
> >
> > Bspec: 71580
> >
> > v4:
> > - Handle mode change in psr enable/disable
> > - Handle wm_level_disable changes separately in pre plane hook
> > v3:
> > - Split patch
> > v2:
> > - set/clear chicken bit in post_plane_update
> > - apply for ICL as well
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 14
> > +++++++++++++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 7 +++++--
> > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > index ab146b5b68bd..4236ad751c2c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > @@ -1157,6 +1157,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
> > bool has_psr2;
> > bool enable_psr2_sel_fetch;
> > bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
> > + bool wm_level_disabled;
> > u32 dc3co_exitline;
> > u16 su_y_granularity;
> > struct drm_dp_vsc_sdp psr_vsc;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > index 26ad4365960f..9c416b301555 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -1136,6 +1136,7 @@ static u32 wa_16013835468_bit_get(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >
> > /*
> > * Wa_16013835468
> > + * Wa_14015648006
> > */
> > static void wm_optimization_wa(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> > @@ -1143,6 +1144,11 @@ static void wm_optimization_wa(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > bool set_wa_bit = false;
> >
> > + /* Wa_14015648006 */
> > + if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> > + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 11, 13))
> > + set_wa_bit |= crtc_state->wm_level_disabled;
> > +
> > /* Wa_16013835468 */
> > if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
> > set_wa_bit |= crtc_state-
> > >hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start !=
> > @@ -1197,6 +1203,7 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >
> > /*
> > * Wa_16013835468
> > + * Wa_14015648006
> > */
> > wm_optimization_wa(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> >
> > @@ -1374,8 +1381,9 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >
> > /*
> > * Wa_16013835468
> > + * Wa_14015648006
> > */
> > - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> > wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
> >
> > @@ -1949,6 +1957,10 @@ void intel_psr_pre_plane_update(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state,
> >
> > if (psr->enabled && needs_to_disable)
> > intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
> > + else if (psr->enabled && old_crtc_state-
> > >wm_level_disabled !=
> > + new_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled)
> > + /* Wa_14015648006 */
> > + wm_optimization_wa(intel_dp,
> > new_crtc_state);
>
> This can now also clear the bit, which is the wrong thing
> to do in pre_plane_update().
Yes, you are right, I will fix this.
>
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > index ff70225c0263..7e2e76afbf2a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > @@ -2276,9 +2276,12 @@ static int skl_wm_check_vblank(struct
> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > return level;
> >
> > /*
> > - * FIXME PSR needs to toggle
> > LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
> > + * PSR needs to toggle LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
> > * based on whether we're limited by the vblank duration.
> > - *
> > + */
> > + crtc_state->wm_level_disabled = level < i915-
> > >display.wm.num_levels - 1;
> > +
> > + /*
> > * FIXME also related to skl+ w/a 1136 (also unimplemented
> > as of
> > * now) perhaps?
> > */
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-29 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-29 9:45 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 0/6] High refresh rate PSR fixes Jouni Högander
2023-03-29 9:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/6] drm/i915/psr: Unify pre/post hooks Jouni Högander
2023-03-29 9:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 2/6] drm/i915/psr: Modify/Fix Wa_16013835468 and prepare for Wa_14015648006 Jouni Högander
2023-03-29 11:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 12:58 ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-03-29 9:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/6] drm/i915/psr: Implement Wa_14015648006 Jouni Högander
2023-03-29 11:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 12:44 ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2023-03-29 9:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 4/6] drm/i915/psr: Add helpers for block count number handling Jouni Högander
2023-03-29 9:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 5/6] drm/i915/psr: Check that vblank is long enough for psr2 Jouni Högander
2023-03-29 9:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 6/6] drm/i915/psr: Implement Display WA #1136 Jouni Högander
2023-03-29 12:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-29 12:59 ` Hogander, Jouni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=996f787923f4678fd7fd2dd80e82acdc88dd82ee.camel@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox