From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915: Allocate power domain set wakerefs dynamically
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:45:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2pdXsSLrGibOmnY@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mt91aksi.fsf@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 10:54:21AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2022, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> > Since the intel_display_power_domain_set struct, currently its current
> > size close 1kB, can be allocated on the stack, it's better to allocate
> > the per-domain wakeref pointer array - used for debugging - within the
> > struct dynamically, so do this.
> >
> > The memory freeing is guaranteed by the fact that the acquired domain
> > references tracked by struct can't be leaked either.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Don't use fetch_and_zero() when freeing the wakerefs array. (Jani)
> > - Simplify intel_display_power_get/put_in_set(). (Jani)
> > - Check in intel_crtc_destroy() that the wakerefs array has been freed.
> >
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c | 4 +
> > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 95 +++++++++++++++----
> > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
> > index 037fc140b585c..2c8d564e73182 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c
> > @@ -205,6 +205,10 @@ static void intel_crtc_destroy(struct drm_crtc *_crtc)
> > cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(&crtc->vblank_pm_qos);
> >
> > drm_crtc_cleanup(&crtc->base);
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM)
> > + drm_WARN_ON(crtc->base.dev, crtc->enabled_power_domains.wakerefs);
> > +#endif
>
> Can we please not add this kind of asserts without abstractions? The
> #ifdef is ugly, looking at crtc->enabled_power_domains.wakerefs directly
> is ugly.
>
> Maybe add an assert_something_or_other(crtc) that does the right thing?
> Similar to the other assert_*() functions we have?
Yes, can add assert_power_domains_disabled(crtc) to this file.
> Does it even need to depend on the config? If it's worth having, maybe
> worth having unconditionally?
The wakerefs array exists only when the config is enabled, but the
non-debug crtc->enabled_power_domains.mask should be checked as well.
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> > kfree(crtc);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > index 4c1de91e56ff9..db235b79c9629 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > @@ -830,20 +830,85 @@ void intel_display_power_put_unchecked(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM)
> > +static void
> > +add_domain_to_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > + struct intel_display_power_domain_set *power_domain_set,
> > + enum intel_display_power_domain domain,
> > + intel_wakeref_t wf)
> > +{
> > + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, test_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits));
> > +
> > + if (!power_domain_set->wakerefs)
> > + power_domain_set->wakerefs = kcalloc(POWER_DOMAIN_NUM,
> > + sizeof(*power_domain_set->wakerefs),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
> > + if (power_domain_set->wakerefs)
> > + power_domain_set->wakerefs[domain] = wf;
> > +
> > + set_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static intel_wakeref_t
> > +remove_domain_from_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > + struct intel_display_power_domain_set *power_domain_set,
> > + enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> > +{
> > + intel_wakeref_t wf;
> > +
> > + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !test_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits));
> > +
> > + clear_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits);
> > +
> > + if (!power_domain_set->wakerefs)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + wf = fetch_and_zero(&power_domain_set->wakerefs[domain]);
> > +
> > + if (bitmap_empty(power_domain_set->mask.bits, POWER_DOMAIN_NUM)) {
> > + kfree(power_domain_set->wakerefs);
> > + power_domain_set->wakerefs = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return wf;
> > +
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static void
> > +add_domain_to_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > + struct intel_display_power_domain_set *power_domain_set,
> > + enum intel_display_power_domain domain,
> > + intel_wakeref_t wf)
> > +{
> > + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, test_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits));
> > +
> > + set_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static intel_wakeref_t
> > +remove_domain_from_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > + struct intel_display_power_domain_set *power_domain_set,
> > + enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> > +{
> > + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !test_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits));
> > +
> > + clear_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits);
> > +
> > + return -1;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > void
> > intel_display_power_get_in_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > struct intel_display_power_domain_set *power_domain_set,
> > enum intel_display_power_domain domain)
> > {
> > - intel_wakeref_t __maybe_unused wf;
> > -
> > - drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, test_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits));
> > + intel_wakeref_t wf;
> >
> > wf = intel_display_power_get(i915, domain);
> > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM)
> > - power_domain_set->wakerefs[domain] = wf;
> > -#endif
> > - set_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits);
> > +
> > + add_domain_to_set(i915, power_domain_set, domain, wf);
> > }
> >
> > bool
> > @@ -853,16 +918,11 @@ intel_display_power_get_in_set_if_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > {
> > intel_wakeref_t wf;
> >
> > - drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, test_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits));
> > -
> > wf = intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(i915, domain);
> > if (!wf)
> > return false;
> >
> > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM)
> > - power_domain_set->wakerefs[domain] = wf;
> > -#endif
> > - set_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits);
> > + add_domain_to_set(i915, power_domain_set, domain, wf);
> >
> > return true;
> > }
> > @@ -874,17 +934,10 @@ intel_display_power_put_mask_in_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > {
> > enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
> >
> > - drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
> > - !bitmap_subset(mask->bits, power_domain_set->mask.bits, POWER_DOMAIN_NUM));
> > -
> > for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) {
> > - intel_wakeref_t __maybe_unused wf = -1;
> > + intel_wakeref_t wf = remove_domain_from_set(i915, power_domain_set, domain);
> >
> > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM)
> > - wf = fetch_and_zero(&power_domain_set->wakerefs[domain]);
> > -#endif
> > intel_display_power_put(i915, domain, wf);
> > - clear_bit(domain, power_domain_set->mask.bits);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> > index 1e77e52c87fec..662123d260a7a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ struct i915_power_domains {
> > struct intel_display_power_domain_set {
> > struct intel_power_domain_mask mask;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM
> > - intel_wakeref_t wakerefs[POWER_DOMAIN_NUM];
> > + intel_wakeref_t *wakerefs;
> > #endif
> > };
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-07 17:09 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/9] drm/i915/tgl+: Enable DC power states on all eDP ports Imre Deak
2022-11-07 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915: Allocate power domain set wakerefs dynamically Imre Deak
2022-11-08 8:54 ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-08 13:45 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2022-11-08 15:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2022-11-10 19:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-10 19:55 ` Imre Deak
2022-11-10 21:49 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-11 12:37 ` Imre Deak
2022-11-11 13:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-11 13:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-11 15:47 ` Imre Deak
2022-11-11 18:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-11 18:56 ` Imre Deak
2022-11-11 19:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-11 21:38 ` Imre Deak
2022-11-07 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915: Move the POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_IO_A definition to its logical place Imre Deak
2022-11-07 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915: Use the AUX_IO power domain only for eDP/PSR port Imre Deak
2022-11-08 15:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2022-11-07 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/i915/tgl+: Enable display DC power states on all eDP ports Imre Deak
2022-11-08 15:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2022-11-10 18:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-10 18:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-10 19:10 ` Imre Deak
2022-11-07 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/i915: Add missing AUX_IO_A power domain->well mappings Imre Deak
2022-11-07 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915: Add missing DC_OFF " Imre Deak
2022-11-07 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915: Factor out function to get/put AUX_IO power for main link Imre Deak
2022-11-08 15:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2022-11-10 10:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-10 10:44 ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-10 12:29 ` Imre Deak
2022-11-07 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915: Don't enable the AUX_IO power for combo-PHY external DP port main links Imre Deak
2022-11-08 15:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2022-11-10 10:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-10 12:27 ` Imre Deak
2022-11-07 17:09 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915/mtl+: Don't enable the AUX_IO power for non-eDP " Imre Deak
2022-11-08 15:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Imre Deak
2022-11-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/tgl+: Enable DC power states on all eDP ports (rev2) Patchwork
2022-11-07 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-11-07 22:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-08 4:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-11-08 17:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/tgl+: Enable DC power states on all eDP ports (rev8) Patchwork
2022-11-08 17:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-11-08 17:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-08 22:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2pdXsSLrGibOmnY@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox