public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/cdclk: improve abstractions
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 19:57:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbJDcYeDX9a2T/Go@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1639068649.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 06:51:21PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Clean up the cdclk header dependencies.
> 
> Jani Nikula (4):
>   drm/i915/cdclk: move intel_atomic_check_cdclk() to intel_cdclk.c
>   drm/i915/cdclk: un-inline intel_cdclk_state functions
>   drm/i915/cdclk: hide struct intel_cdclk_vals
>   drm/i915/cdclk: turn around i915_drv.h and intel_cdclk.h dependency

Another low hanging fruit would be to move struct intel_cdclk_funcs
definition into intel_cdclk.c.

> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic.c  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c   | 81 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h   | 26 +++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 55 +------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h              |  6 +-
>  5 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.30.2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-09 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-09 16:51 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915/cdclk: improve abstractions Jani Nikula
2021-12-09 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/cdclk: move intel_atomic_check_cdclk() to intel_cdclk.c Jani Nikula
2021-12-09 17:45   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-09 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/cdclk: un-inline intel_cdclk_state functions Jani Nikula
2021-12-09 17:54   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-09 18:38     ` Jani Nikula
2021-12-09 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/cdclk: hide struct intel_cdclk_vals Jani Nikula
2021-12-09 17:46   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-09 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/cdclk: turn around i915_drv.h and intel_cdclk.h dependency Jani Nikula
2021-12-09 17:55   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-09 17:57 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-12-10  4:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/cdclk: improve abstractions Patchwork
2021-12-10  4:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-12-10  4:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-10 15:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YbJDcYeDX9a2T/Go@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox