public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/display: Add CDCLK actions to intel_cdclk_state
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:22:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyJGLUva3ZOLUBui@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220820005822.102716-2-anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 05:58:19PM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> This is a prep patch for what the rest of the series does.
> 
> Add existing actions that change cdclk - squash, crawl, modeset to
> intel_cdclk_state so we have access to the cdclk values
> that are in transition.
> 
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> index b535cf6a7d9e..43835688ee02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ struct drm_i915_private;
>  struct intel_atomic_state;
>  struct intel_crtc_state;
>  
> +enum cdclk_actions {
> +	INTEL_CDCLK_MODESET = 0,
> +	INTEL_CDCLK_SQUASH,
> +	INTEL_CDCLK_CRAWL,
> +	INTEL_CDCLK_NOOP,
> +	MAX_CDCLK_ACTIONS
> +};

This whole actions thing feels overly complicated to me.
I think we should only need something like this:

if (new.squash > old.squash) {
	mid.vco = old.vco;
	mid.squash = new.squash;
} else {
	mid.vco = new.vco;
	mid.squash = old.squash;
}
/*
 * bunch of asserts here to make sure
 * the mid state looks sane.
 */
set_cdclk(mid);
set_cdclk(new);

And perhaps the current set_cdclk needs to get chunked up
into smaller pieces so we don't do all the pre/post stuff
more than once needlessly.

> +
>  struct intel_cdclk_config {
>  	unsigned int cdclk, vco, ref, bypass;
>  	u8 voltage_level;
> @@ -51,6 +59,11 @@ struct intel_cdclk_state {
>  
>  	/* bitmask of active pipes */
>  	u8 active_pipes;
> +
> +	struct cdclk_step {
> +		enum cdclk_actions action;
> +		u32 cdclk;
> +	} steps[MAX_CDCLK_ACTIONS];
>  };
>  
>  int intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> -- 
> 2.25.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-14 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-20  0:58 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] CDCLK churn: move checks to atomic check Anusha Srivatsa
2022-08-20  0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/display: Add CDCLK actions to intel_cdclk_state Anusha Srivatsa
2022-09-14 20:00   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-09-14 21:22   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-09-14 21:42     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-09-14 21:58       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2022-09-15  6:05         ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-08-20  0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/squash: s/intel_cdclk_can_squash/intel_cdclk_squash Anusha Srivatsa
2022-09-14 20:03   ` Navare, Manasi
2022-08-20  0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/display: s/intel_cdclk_can_crawl/intel_cdclk_crawl Anusha Srivatsa
2022-08-20  0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/display: Add cdclk checks to atomic check Anusha Srivatsa
2022-08-20  1:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for CDCLK churn: move " Patchwork
2022-08-20  1:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-08-20  1:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-27 23:26 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Move CDCLK checks to atomic check phase Anusha Srivatsa
2022-07-27 23:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/display: Add CDCLK actions to intel_cdclk_state Anusha Srivatsa
2022-03-15 19:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] Add CDCLK checks to atomic check phase Anusha Srivatsa
2022-03-15 19:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/display: Add CDCLK actions to intel_cdclk_state Anusha Srivatsa
2022-03-11  7:04 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] Add CDCLK checks to atomic check phase Anusha Srivatsa
2022-03-11  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915/display: Add CDCLK actions to intel_cdclk_state Anusha Srivatsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyJGLUva3ZOLUBui@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anusha.srivatsa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox