Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
	Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Increase FLR timeout from 3s to 9s
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 16:00:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlSgCVqT5vhW7kKI@ashyti-mobl2.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZlRk1Qdr8i2YPITh@ashyti-mobl2.lan>

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 11:47:49AM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 10:07:44AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:58:53AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > Following the guidelines it takes 3 seconds to perform an FLR
> > > reset. Let's give it a bit more slack because this time can
> > > change depending on the platform and on the firmware
> > 
> > But did we see any issue with that?
> 
> yes, we have some FLR expiration timeouts that apparently are not
> able to bring up the device and the memory is not accessible
> anymore. It's worth giving it a bit more time.
> 
> > if that changes per platform and per firmware, shouldn't it all
> > be explicit in the spec as well?
> 
> Is it always documented? We might anyway die after the FLR reset
> failure, so that I see it quite safe to wait and pray a little
> more.

if needed I can improve the log with the dmesg error print.

Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-27 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23 23:58 [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Increase FLR timeout from 3s to 9s Andi Shyti
2024-05-24  0:40 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-05-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-27 10:47   ` Andi Shyti
2024-05-27 15:00     ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2024-05-28 16:36       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-25  8:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
2024-05-29  8:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Nirmoy Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZlSgCVqT5vhW7kKI@ashyti-mobl2.lan \
    --to=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox