From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
"Janusz Krzysztofik" <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Increase FLR timeout from 3s to 9s
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 12:36:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlYIE5I269lozmW1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZlSgCVqT5vhW7kKI@ashyti-mobl2.lan>
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 04:00:25PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 11:47:49AM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 10:07:44AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:58:53AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > > Following the guidelines it takes 3 seconds to perform an FLR
> > > > reset. Let's give it a bit more slack because this time can
> > > > change depending on the platform and on the firmware
> > >
> > > But did we see any issue with that?
> >
> > yes, we have some FLR expiration timeouts that apparently are not
> > able to bring up the device and the memory is not accessible
> > anymore. It's worth giving it a bit more time.
> >
> > > if that changes per platform and per firmware, shouldn't it all
> > > be explicit in the spec as well?
> >
> > Is it always documented? We might anyway die after the FLR reset
> > failure, so that I see it quite safe to wait and pray a little
> > more.
>
> if needed I can improve the log with the dmesg error print.
very good points indeed. I believe it would be worth some mentions
about the faced issues and good idea about dmesg as well. but up to you.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-28 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-23 23:58 [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Increase FLR timeout from 3s to 9s Andi Shyti
2024-05-24 0:40 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-05-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-27 10:47 ` Andi Shyti
2024-05-27 15:00 ` Andi Shyti
2024-05-28 16:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-05-25 8:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
2024-05-29 8:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Nirmoy Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZlYIE5I269lozmW1@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox