From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.saarinen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Add some essential functionality for joiners
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:42:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zt77OS6hVSzwstwX@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dca1c23f-10ff-414c-a0cb-ff3d78a6f963@intel.com>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 01:17:00PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>
> On 9/6/2024 8:54 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:27:58PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> >> From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> >>
> >> In most of the cases we now try to avoid mentioning things like
> >> "bigjoiner" or "ultrajoiner" trying to unify the API and refer
> >> mostly to all this functionality as "joiner".
> >> In majority cases that should be way to go.
> >> However in some cases we still need to distinguish between
> >> bigjoiner primaries and secondaries(such as DSC register programming).
> >>
> >> Create correspondent helper functions and start using them,
> >> in order be prepared for adding ultrajoiner functionality.
> >>
> >> v2: Fixed checkpatch warnings (Ankit)
> >> v3: Introduce ultrajoiner helpers in next patch.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++--
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h | 6 ++-
> >> .../drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 4 +-
> >> 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> >> index 928d985f9985..83ed018b1735 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> >> @@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >>
> >> if (new_crtc_state && intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(new_crtc_state)) {
> >> struct intel_crtc *primary_crtc =
> >> - intel_primary_crtc(new_crtc_state);
> >> + intel_joiner_primary_crtc(new_crtc_state);
> >> struct intel_plane *primary_crtc_plane =
> >> intel_crtc_get_plane(primary_crtc, plane->id);
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> index 257e479310c2..3278debf47cc 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> >> @@ -254,6 +254,50 @@ static enum pipe joiner_primary_pipe(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> return ffs(crtc_state->joiner_pipes) - 1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static bool intel_is_joiner(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> +{
> >> + return intel_joiner_num_pipes(crtc_state) > 1;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static u8 bigjoiner_primary_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> +{
> >> + int lsb = ffs(crtc_state->joiner_pipes) - 1;
> >> + int msb = fls(crtc_state->joiner_pipes) - 1;
> >> + int i;
> >> + u8 bigjoiner_primary_mask = 0;
> >> +
> >> + for (i = lsb; i < msb; i += 4) {
> >> + /*
> >> + * Regardless of how joiner_pipes mask is set, currently
> >> + * we always assume, that primary pipe bit goes before secondary
> >> + * pipe bit. So in each set of 2 bits, least significant bit is
> >> + * bigjoiner primary pipe and most significant bit is secondary pipe.
> >> + */
> >> + bigjoiner_primary_mask |=
> >> + ((BIT(0) | BIT(2)) << i) & crtc_state->joiner_pipes;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return bigjoiner_primary_mask;
> > This seems needlessly complicated.
> >
> > Something like this?
> >
> > return crtc_state->joiner_pipes & (0b01010101 << joiner_primary_pipe(crtc_state))
>
> Yeah makes sense, will remove the loop and use this.
We could limit this mask to just four bits I suppose since
that's the max currently, and going beyond that (should
future hardware support such a thing) would need additonal
work anyway.
>
>
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_primary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> +{
> >> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> >> +
> >> + if (!intel_is_joiner(crtc_state))
> >> + return false;
> >> +
> >> + return BIT(crtc->pipe) & bigjoiner_primary_pipes(crtc_state);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_secondary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> +{
> >> + if (!intel_is_joiner(crtc_state))
> >> + return false;
> >> +
> >> + return !intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_primary(crtc_state);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> u8 intel_crtc_joiner_secondary_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> {
> >> if (crtc_state->joiner_pipes)
> >> @@ -290,7 +334,7 @@ u8 intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> return BIT(crtc->pipe) | crtc_state->joiner_pipes;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -struct intel_crtc *intel_primary_crtc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> +struct intel_crtc *intel_joiner_primary_crtc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> {
> >> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> >>
> >> @@ -810,7 +854,7 @@ intel_get_crtc_new_encoder(const struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >> int num_encoders = 0;
> >> int i;
> >>
> >> - primary_crtc = intel_primary_crtc(crtc_state);
> >> + primary_crtc = intel_joiner_primary_crtc(crtc_state);
> > That rename seems unrelated to the rest of the patch.
>
> I can have it in separate patch.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ankit
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> for_each_new_connector_in_state(&state->base, connector, connector_state, i) {
> >> if (connector_state->crtc != &primary_crtc->base)
> >> @@ -4530,7 +4574,7 @@ copy_joiner_crtc_state_nomodeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >> {
> >> struct intel_crtc_state *secondary_crtc_state =
> >> intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, secondary_crtc);
> >> - struct intel_crtc *primary_crtc = intel_primary_crtc(secondary_crtc_state);
> >> + struct intel_crtc *primary_crtc = intel_joiner_primary_crtc(secondary_crtc_state);
> >> const struct intel_crtc_state *primary_crtc_state =
> >> intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, primary_crtc);
> >>
> >> @@ -4550,7 +4594,7 @@ copy_joiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >> {
> >> struct intel_crtc_state *secondary_crtc_state =
> >> intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, secondary_crtc);
> >> - struct intel_crtc *primary_crtc = intel_primary_crtc(secondary_crtc_state);
> >> + struct intel_crtc *primary_crtc = intel_joiner_primary_crtc(secondary_crtc_state);
> >> const struct intel_crtc_state *primary_crtc_state =
> >> intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, primary_crtc);
> >> struct intel_crtc_state *saved_state;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >> index c0f8bb7e5095..840a98947de8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> >> @@ -424,10 +424,12 @@ enum phy intel_port_to_phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port);
> >> bool is_trans_port_sync_mode(const struct intel_crtc_state *state);
> >> bool is_trans_port_sync_master(const struct intel_crtc_state *state);
> >> u8 intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >> -bool intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >> bool intel_crtc_is_joiner_primary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >> +bool intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >> +bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_primary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >> +bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_secondary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >> u8 intel_crtc_joiner_secondary_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >> -struct intel_crtc *intel_primary_crtc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >> +struct intel_crtc *intel_joiner_primary_crtc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >> bool intel_crtc_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> >> bool intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> >> const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
> >> index 3491db5cad31..b53b810c6470 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
> >> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >> "transitional active state does not match atomic hw state (expected %i, found %i)\n",
> >> sw_crtc_state->hw.active, crtc->active);
> >>
> >> - primary_crtc = intel_primary_crtc(sw_crtc_state);
> >> + primary_crtc = intel_joiner_primary_crtc(sw_crtc_state);
> >>
> >> for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &primary_crtc->base, encoder) {
> >> enum pipe pipe;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> >> index 2e849b015e74..8158e3702ed5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> >> @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ void intel_uncompressed_joiner_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> u32 dss_ctl1_val = 0;
> >>
> >> if (crtc_state->joiner_pipes && !crtc_state->dsc.compression_enable) {
> >> - if (intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(crtc_state))
> >> + if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_secondary(crtc_state))
> >> dss_ctl1_val |= UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_SECONDARY;
> >> else
> >> dss_ctl1_val |= UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_PRIMARY;
> >> @@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ void intel_dsc_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >> }
> >> if (crtc_state->joiner_pipes) {
> >> dss_ctl1_val |= BIG_JOINER_ENABLE;
> >> - if (!intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(crtc_state))
> >> + if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_primary(crtc_state))
> >> dss_ctl1_val |= PRIMARY_BIG_JOINER_ENABLE;
> >> }
> >> intel_de_write(dev_priv, dss_ctl1_reg(crtc, crtc_state->cpu_transcoder), dss_ctl1_val);
> >> --
> >> 2.45.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-09 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-06 12:57 [PATCH 00/14] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/display: Modify debugfs for joiner to force n pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 14:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-06 14:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09 5:40 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-09 13:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-10 5:42 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-10 11:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-10 14:10 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-10 14:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09 5:34 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 14:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09 6:10 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in dsc helpers for slices, bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Add some essential functionality for joiners Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 15:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09 7:47 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-09 13:42 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Split current joiner hw state readout Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 15:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09 7:55 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner and uncompressed joiner hw readout sanity checks Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 15:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09 8:31 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-09 8:40 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 15:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09 8:44 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/display: Add helpers to check for ultrajoiner primary Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/display/vdsc: Add ultrajoiner support with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 16:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-06 16:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09 9:23 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-09 13:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Add new abstraction layer to handle pipe order for different joiners Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Compute config and mode valid changes for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/intel_dp: Add support for forcing ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 14:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev7) Patchwork
2024-09-06 14:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zt77OS6hVSzwstwX@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox