Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.saarinen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Add some essential functionality for joiners
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 18:24:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZtseuOqSAGGamFb1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240906125807.3960642-6-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:27:58PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> 
> In most of the cases we now try to avoid mentioning things like
> "bigjoiner" or "ultrajoiner" trying to unify the API and refer
> mostly to all this functionality as "joiner".
> In majority cases that should be way to go.
> However in some cases we still need to distinguish between
> bigjoiner primaries and secondaries(such as DSC register programming).
> 
> Create correspondent helper functions and start using them,
> in order be prepared for adding ultrajoiner functionality.
> 
> v2: Fixed checkpatch warnings (Ankit)
> v3: Introduce ultrajoiner helpers in next patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  | 52 +++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h  |  6 ++-
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c   |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c     |  4 +-
>  5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index 928d985f9985..83ed018b1735 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  
>  	if (new_crtc_state && intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(new_crtc_state)) {
>  		struct intel_crtc *primary_crtc =
> -			intel_primary_crtc(new_crtc_state);
> +			intel_joiner_primary_crtc(new_crtc_state);
>  		struct intel_plane *primary_crtc_plane =
>  			intel_crtc_get_plane(primary_crtc, plane->id);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 257e479310c2..3278debf47cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -254,6 +254,50 @@ static enum pipe joiner_primary_pipe(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	return ffs(crtc_state->joiner_pipes) - 1;
>  }
>  
> +static bool intel_is_joiner(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	return intel_joiner_num_pipes(crtc_state) > 1;
> +}
> +
> +static u8 bigjoiner_primary_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	int lsb = ffs(crtc_state->joiner_pipes) - 1;
> +	int msb = fls(crtc_state->joiner_pipes) - 1;
> +	int i;
> +	u8 bigjoiner_primary_mask = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = lsb; i < msb; i += 4) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Regardless of how joiner_pipes mask is set, currently
> +		 * we always assume, that primary pipe bit goes before secondary
> +		 * pipe bit. So in each set of 2 bits, least significant bit is
> +		 * bigjoiner primary pipe and most significant bit is secondary pipe.
> +		 */
> +		bigjoiner_primary_mask |=
> +			((BIT(0) | BIT(2)) << i) & crtc_state->joiner_pipes;
> +	}
> +
> +	return bigjoiner_primary_mask;

This seems needlessly complicated.

Something like this?

return crtc_state->joiner_pipes & (0b01010101 << joiner_primary_pipe(crtc_state))

> +}
> +
> +bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_primary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> +
> +	if (!intel_is_joiner(crtc_state))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return BIT(crtc->pipe) & bigjoiner_primary_pipes(crtc_state);
> +}
> +
> +bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_secondary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	if (!intel_is_joiner(crtc_state))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return !intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_primary(crtc_state);
> +}
> +
>  u8 intel_crtc_joiner_secondary_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	if (crtc_state->joiner_pipes)
> @@ -290,7 +334,7 @@ u8 intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	return BIT(crtc->pipe) | crtc_state->joiner_pipes;
>  }
>  
> -struct intel_crtc *intel_primary_crtc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +struct intel_crtc *intel_joiner_primary_crtc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
>  
> @@ -810,7 +854,7 @@ intel_get_crtc_new_encoder(const struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	int num_encoders = 0;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	primary_crtc = intel_primary_crtc(crtc_state);
> +	primary_crtc = intel_joiner_primary_crtc(crtc_state);

That rename seems unrelated to the rest of the patch.

>  
>  	for_each_new_connector_in_state(&state->base, connector, connector_state, i) {
>  		if (connector_state->crtc != &primary_crtc->base)
> @@ -4530,7 +4574,7 @@ copy_joiner_crtc_state_nomodeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *secondary_crtc_state =
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, secondary_crtc);
> -	struct intel_crtc *primary_crtc = intel_primary_crtc(secondary_crtc_state);
> +	struct intel_crtc *primary_crtc = intel_joiner_primary_crtc(secondary_crtc_state);
>  	const struct intel_crtc_state *primary_crtc_state =
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, primary_crtc);
>  
> @@ -4550,7 +4594,7 @@ copy_joiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  {
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *secondary_crtc_state =
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, secondary_crtc);
> -	struct intel_crtc *primary_crtc = intel_primary_crtc(secondary_crtc_state);
> +	struct intel_crtc *primary_crtc = intel_joiner_primary_crtc(secondary_crtc_state);
>  	const struct intel_crtc_state *primary_crtc_state =
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, primary_crtc);
>  	struct intel_crtc_state *saved_state;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> index c0f8bb7e5095..840a98947de8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> @@ -424,10 +424,12 @@ enum phy intel_port_to_phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port);
>  bool is_trans_port_sync_mode(const struct intel_crtc_state *state);
>  bool is_trans_port_sync_master(const struct intel_crtc_state *state);
>  u8 intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> -bool intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>  bool intel_crtc_is_joiner_primary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +bool intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_primary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_secondary(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>  u8 intel_crtc_joiner_secondary_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> -struct intel_crtc *intel_primary_crtc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +struct intel_crtc *intel_joiner_primary_crtc(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>  bool intel_crtc_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>  bool intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>  			       const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
> index 3491db5cad31..b53b810c6470 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ verify_crtc_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  			"transitional active state does not match atomic hw state (expected %i, found %i)\n",
>  			sw_crtc_state->hw.active, crtc->active);
>  
> -	primary_crtc = intel_primary_crtc(sw_crtc_state);
> +	primary_crtc = intel_joiner_primary_crtc(sw_crtc_state);
>  
>  	for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &primary_crtc->base, encoder) {
>  		enum pipe pipe;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> index 2e849b015e74..8158e3702ed5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ void intel_uncompressed_joiner_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	u32 dss_ctl1_val = 0;
>  
>  	if (crtc_state->joiner_pipes && !crtc_state->dsc.compression_enable) {
> -		if (intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(crtc_state))
> +		if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_secondary(crtc_state))
>  			dss_ctl1_val |= UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_SECONDARY;
>  		else
>  			dss_ctl1_val |= UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER_PRIMARY;
> @@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ void intel_dsc_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	}
>  	if (crtc_state->joiner_pipes) {
>  		dss_ctl1_val |= BIG_JOINER_ENABLE;
> -		if (!intel_crtc_is_joiner_secondary(crtc_state))
> +		if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_primary(crtc_state))
>  			dss_ctl1_val |= PRIMARY_BIG_JOINER_ENABLE;
>  	}
>  	intel_de_write(dev_priv, dss_ctl1_reg(crtc, crtc_state->cpu_transcoder), dss_ctl1_val);
> -- 
> 2.45.2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-06 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-06 12:57 [PATCH 00/14] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/display: Modify debugfs for joiner to force n pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 14:46   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-06 14:54     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09  5:40       ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-09 13:40         ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-10  5:42           ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-10 11:46             ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-10 14:10               ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-10 14:16                 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09  5:34     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 14:52   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09  6:10     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/display: Use joined pipes in dsc helpers for slices, bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Add some essential functionality for joiners Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 15:24   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-09  7:47     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-09 13:42       ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-06 12:57 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Split current joiner hw state readout Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 15:29   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09  7:55     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner and uncompressed joiner hw readout sanity checks Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 15:39   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09  8:31     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-09  8:40       ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 15:58   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09  8:44     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/display: Add helpers to check for ultrajoiner primary Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/display/vdsc: Add ultrajoiner support with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 16:30   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-06 16:39     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-09  9:23       ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-09 13:46         ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Add new abstraction layer to handle pipe order for different joiners Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Compute config and mode valid changes for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/intel_dp: Add support for forcing ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 14:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev7) Patchwork
2024-09-06 14:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZtseuOqSAGGamFb1@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox