Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: feng.tang@intel.com, tiejun.li@intel.com, guangli.li@intel.com,
	frank.du@intel.com, guobing.chen@intel.com, jiebin.sun@intel.com,
	Shuhua.Fan@intel.com, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	fan.zhao@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com, shan.kang@intel.com,
	zhengjun.xing@intel.com, Wenhuan.Huang@intel.com,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, lkp@lists.01.org,
	ming.a.chen@intel.com, yu.ma@intel.com, jessica.ji@intel.com,
	dapeng1.mi@intel.com, wangyang.guo@intel.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	gengxin.xie@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:44:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab9ebc5a-7d79-8003-c7bc-5cf0923983c6@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160625087275.29168.7080737993781611765@build.alporthouse.com>



On 11/25/2020 4:47 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Oliver Sang (2020-11-19 07:20:18)
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Could you add intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org into reports going
>>> forward.
>>>
>>> Quoting kernel test robot (2020-11-11 17:58:11)
>>>>
>>>> Greeting,
>>>>
>>>> FYI, we noticed a -54.0% regression of phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second due to commit:
>>>
>>> How many runs are there on the bad version to ensure the bisect is
>>> repeatable?
>>
>> test 4 times.
>> zxing@inn:/result/phoronix-test-suite/performance-true-Radial_Gradient_Paint-1024x1024-jxrendermark-1.2.4-ucode=0xd6-monitor=da39a3ee/lkp-cfl-d1/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da$ grep -r "operations_per_second" */stats.json
>> 0/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4133.487932,
>> 1/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4120.421503,
>> 2/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4188.414835,
>> 3/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4068.549514,
> 
> a w/o revert (drm-tip)
> b w/ revert
> +mB----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> |                             ..b                                              |
> |                             ..b.aa                                           |
> |                             ....a.a                                          |
> |                             ....a.a                                          |
> |                      b  b  ........a                                         |
> |                   b  b  b b......... a                                       |
> |                   b  bb bbb...........                                       |
> |b               ab bbab.bb.b............ba b a a            ab               a|
> |                             |__A__|                                          |
> |                             |MA_|                                            |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>      N                Min           Max        Median           Avg        Stddev
> a 120          3621.8761     7356.4442     4606.7895     4607.9132     156.17693
> b 120          2664.0563     6359.9686     4519.5036     4534.4463     95.471121
> 
> The patch is not expected to have any impact on the machine you are testing on.
> -Chris
> 

What's your code base?
For my side:
1) sync the code to the head of Linux mainline
2) git reset --hard 59dd13ad31
3) git revert 59dd13ad3107
We compare the test result of commit 59dd13ad3107 (step 2) and 
2052847b06f8 (step 3, revert 59dd13ad3107), the regression should 
related with 59dd13ad3107. Each test case we run 5 times.
=========================================================================================
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/need_x/test/option_a/option_b/cpufreq_governor/ucode/debug-setup:
 
lkp-cfl-d1/phoronix-test-suite/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/true/jxrendermark-1.2.4/Radial 
Gradient Paint/1024x1024/performance/0xde/regression_test

commit:
   0dccdba51e852271a3dbc9358375f4c882b863f2
   59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da
   2052847b06f863a028f7f3bbc62401e043b34301 (revert 59dd13ad3107)

0dccdba51e852271 59dd13ad310793757e34afa489d 2052847b06f863a028f7f3bbc62
---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
          %stddev     %change         %stddev     %change         %stddev
              \          |                \          |                \
       8145 ±  2%     -53.1%       3817 ±  3%      -1.8%       7995 
 
phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second


-- 
Zhengjun Xing
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-26  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20201111155811.GB24657@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
     [not found] ` <160527763346.5566.3471508802857132043@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
2020-11-19  7:20   ` [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression Oliver Sang
2020-11-24 20:47     ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-26  1:44       ` Xing Zhengjun [this message]
2020-11-26 21:34         ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-27  1:51           ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-11-27 13:07             ` Chris Wilson
     [not found]   ` <df7e1556-ee01-ad27-1abb-ffe5d74567b7@intel.com>
2020-12-10 13:07     ` Joonas Lahtinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ab9ebc5a-7d79-8003-c7bc-5cf0923983c6@linux.intel.com \
    --to=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Shuhua.Fan@intel.com \
    --cc=Wenhuan.Huang@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=fan.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=frank.du@intel.com \
    --cc=gengxin.xie@intel.com \
    --cc=guangli.li@intel.com \
    --cc=guobing.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jessica.ji@intel.com \
    --cc=jiebin.sun@intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=ming.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=shan.kang@intel.com \
    --cc=tiejun.li@intel.com \
    --cc=wangyang.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yu.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox