Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove nonpriv flags when srm/lrm
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:23:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecc5965d-71d8-c716-253e-dd54d7a06e18@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157191707108.2725.12035547014609265414@skylake-alporthouse-com>

On 24/10/2019 14:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-10-24 12:03:31)
>> On testing the whitelists, using any of the nonpriv
>> flags when trying to access the register offset will lead
>> to failure.
>>
>> Define address mask to get the mmio offset in order
>> to guard against any current and future flag usage.
>>
>> v2: apply also on scrub_whitelisted_registers (Lionel)
>>
>> Cc: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli@intel.com>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> -Chris
>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove nonpriv flags when srm/lrm
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:23:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecc5965d-71d8-c716-253e-dd54d7a06e18@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191024152301.oVDVnxrFBDVcA36Dd_vdP1Cr5qX5vVDAbn10SOL2xHA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157191707108.2725.12035547014609265414@skylake-alporthouse-com>

On 24/10/2019 14:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-10-24 12:03:31)
>> On testing the whitelists, using any of the nonpriv
>> flags when trying to access the register offset will lead
>> to failure.
>>
>> Define address mask to get the mmio offset in order
>> to guard against any current and future flag usage.
>>
>> v2: apply also on scrub_whitelisted_registers (Lionel)
>>
>> Cc: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli@intel.com>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> -Chris
>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-24 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-24 10:38 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove nonpriv flags when srm/lrm Mika Kuoppala
2019-10-24 10:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-10-24 10:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/tgl: whitelist PS_(DEPTH|INVOCATION)_COUNT Mika Kuoppala
2019-10-24 10:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-10-24 10:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove nonpriv flags when srm/lrm Lionel Landwerlin
2019-10-24 10:52   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lionel Landwerlin
2019-10-24 11:03 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-10-24 11:03   ` [Intel-gfx] " Mika Kuoppala
2019-10-24 11:37   ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-24 11:37     ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-10-24 15:23     ` Lionel Landwerlin [this message]
2019-10-24 15:23       ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-10-24 22:36       ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-24 22:36         ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-10-24 15:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Remove nonpriv flags when srm/lrm (rev2) Patchwork
2019-10-24 15:29   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-10-24 15:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-10-24 15:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-10-25 23:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-10-25 23:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ecc5965d-71d8-c716-253e-dd54d7a06e18@intel.com \
    --to=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox