Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Himal Prasad Ghimiray" <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 11:48:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <04ed3481-cc77-43c7-89f4-159ce52f3e7c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241029120117.449694-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com>

On 10/29/2024 05:01, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h so this can be used in other
> places without needing keep the same comment about removal of this WA
> in the future. The WA, which flushes work or workqueues, is now wrapped
> in macros and can be reused wherever needed.
>
> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.11+
> Suggested-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 11 +----------
>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> index 4c3f0ebe78a9..f1fbfe916867 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
> @@ -191,4 +191,18 @@ void xe_device_declare_wedged(struct xe_device *xe);
>   struct xe_file *xe_file_get(struct xe_file *xef);
>   void xe_file_put(struct xe_file *xef);
>   
> +/*
> + * Occasionally it is seen that the G2H worker starts running after a delay of more than
> + * a second even after being queued and activated by the Linux workqueue subsystem. This
> + * leads to G2H timeout error. The root cause of issue lies with scheduling latency of
> + * Lunarlake Hybrid CPU. Issue disappears if we disable Lunarlake atom cores from BIOS
> + * and this is beyond xe kmd.
> + *
> + * TODO: Drop this change once workqueue scheduling delay issue is fixed on LNL Hybrid CPU.
> + */
> +#define LNL_FLUSH_WORKQUEUE(wq__) \
> +	flush_workqueue(wq__)
> +#define LNL_FLUSH_WORK(wrk__) \
> +	flush_work(wrk__)
> +
>   #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index 1b5d8fb1033a..703b44b257a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -1018,17 +1018,8 @@ static int guc_ct_send_recv(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
>   
>   	ret = wait_event_timeout(ct->g2h_fence_wq, g2h_fence.done, HZ);
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * Occasionally it is seen that the G2H worker starts running after a delay of more than
> -	 * a second even after being queued and activated by the Linux workqueue subsystem. This
> -	 * leads to G2H timeout error. The root cause of issue lies with scheduling latency of
> -	 * Lunarlake Hybrid CPU. Issue dissappears if we disable Lunarlake atom cores from BIOS
> -	 * and this is beyond xe kmd.
> -	 *
> -	 * TODO: Drop this change once workqueue scheduling delay issue is fixed on LNL Hybrid CPU.
> -	 */
>   	if (!ret) {
> -		flush_work(&ct->g2h_worker);
> +		LNL_FLUSH_WORK(&ct->g2h_worker);
>   		if (g2h_fence.done) {
>   			xe_gt_warn(gt, "G2H fence %u, action %04x, done\n",
>   				   g2h_fence.seqno, action[0]);
This message is still wrong.

We have a warning that says 'job completed successfully'! That is 
misleading. It needs to say "done after flush" or "done but flush was 
required" or something along those lines.

John.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 12:01 [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h Nirmoy Das
2024-10-29 12:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/xe/ufence: Flush xe ordered_wq in case of ufence timeout Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:21   ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 18:49   ` John Harrison
2024-10-29 12:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/xe/guc/tlb: Flush g2h worker in case of tlb timeout Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:19   ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 18:51   ` John Harrison
2024-11-04 11:20     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-29 14:57 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v5,1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h Patchwork
2024-10-29 14:58 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-29 14:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:10 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:13 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:14 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:41 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 17:47 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-01 13:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] " Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:21 ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 13:44   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 15:47     ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-11-01 18:48 ` John Harrison [this message]
2024-11-04  9:52   ` Nirmoy Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=04ed3481-cc77-43c7-89f4-159ce52f3e7c@intel.com \
    --to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox