Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
	Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
	Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/xe/ufence: Flush xe ordered_wq in case of ufence timeout
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:01:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241029120117.449694-2-nirmoy.das@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241029120117.449694-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com>

Flush xe ordered_wq in case of ufence timeout which is observed
on LNL and that points to recent scheduling issue with E-cores.

This is similar to the recent fix:
commit e51527233804 ("drm/xe/guc/ct: Flush g2h worker in case of g2h
response timeout") and should be removed once there is a E-core
scheduling fix for LNL.

v2: Add platform check(Himal)
    s/__flush_workqueue/flush_workqueue(Jani)
v3: Remove gfx platform check as the issue related to cpu
    platform(John)
v4: Use the Common macro(John) and print when the flush resolves
    timeout(Matt B)

Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.11+
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2754
Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c
index f5deb81eba01..5b4264ea38bd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_wait_user_fence.c
@@ -155,6 +155,13 @@ int xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 		}
 
 		if (!timeout) {
+			LNL_FLUSH_WORKQUEUE(xe->ordered_wq);
+			err = do_compare(addr, args->value, args->mask,
+					 args->op);
+			if (err <= 0) {
+				drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "LNL_FLUSH_WORKQUEUE resolved ufence timeout\n");
+				break;
+			}
 			err = -ETIME;
 			break;
 		}
-- 
2.46.0


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-29 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 12:01 [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h Nirmoy Das
2024-10-29 12:01 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-11-01 13:21   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/xe/ufence: Flush xe ordered_wq in case of ufence timeout Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 18:49   ` John Harrison
2024-10-29 12:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/xe/guc/tlb: Flush g2h worker in case of tlb timeout Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:19   ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 18:51   ` John Harrison
2024-11-04 11:20     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-29 14:57 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v5,1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h Patchwork
2024-10-29 14:58 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-29 14:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:10 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:13 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:14 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:41 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 17:47 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-01 13:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] " Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:21 ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 13:44   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 15:47     ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-11-01 18:48 ` John Harrison
2024-11-04  9:52   ` Nirmoy Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241029120117.449694-2-nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --to=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox