From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:44:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65a8fa25-0c14-4251-ad22-8f4b31be0d4e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afd4adf1-5220-40ff-816e-da588b74fadc@intel.com>
On 11/1/2024 2:21 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 29/10/2024 12:01, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>> Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h so this can be used in other
>> places without needing keep the same comment about removal of this WA
>> in the future. The WA, which flushes work or workqueues, is now wrapped
>> in macros and can be reused wherever needed.
>>
>> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.11+
>> Suggested-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Thanks for reviewing the series, Matt!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-01 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 12:01 [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h Nirmoy Das
2024-10-29 12:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/xe/ufence: Flush xe ordered_wq in case of ufence timeout Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:21 ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 18:49 ` John Harrison
2024-10-29 12:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/xe/guc/tlb: Flush g2h worker in case of tlb timeout Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:19 ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 18:51 ` John Harrison
2024-11-04 11:20 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-10-29 14:57 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v5,1/3] drm/xe: Move LNL scheduling WA to xe_device.h Patchwork
2024-10-29 14:58 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-29 14:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:10 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:13 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:14 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 15:41 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-29 17:47 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-01 13:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] " Nirmoy Das
2024-11-01 13:21 ` Matthew Auld
2024-11-01 13:44 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-11-01 15:47 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-11-01 18:48 ` John Harrison
2024-11-04 9:52 ` Nirmoy Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=65a8fa25-0c14-4251-ad22-8f4b31be0d4e@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox