From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 25/26] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 22:47:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a4e7b14-b55e-4ea2-a044-b48fe711a887@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241008071115.1862704-26-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
On 08-10-2024 12:41, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> Add __must_check attribute for xe_force_wake_get().
>
> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (#rev1)
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> index 7ff2588a8c47..5d749bad9496 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> @@ -169,8 +169,8 @@ static int domain_sleep_wait(struct xe_gt *gt,
> * Return: opaque reference to woken domains or zero if none of requested
> * domains were awake.
> */
> -unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
> +unsigned int __must_check xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> + enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt = fw->gt;
> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> index f0b27dbe7581..70faec9ae2d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_gt(struct xe_gt *gt,
> struct xe_force_wake *fw);
> void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt,
> struct xe_force_wake *fw);
> -unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
> +unsigned int __must_check xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> + enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
I believe this is meant to guarantee that the return code is used;
otherwise, it results in a compiler warning.
Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Regards,
Badal
> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> unsigned int fw_ref);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-08 7:10 [PATCH v8 00/26] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 6:58 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev9) Patchwork
2024-10-08 6:59 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-08 7:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 01/26] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:55 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:03 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 02/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Change awake_domain datatype Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:56 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:04 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 03/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Add a helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:58 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:07 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 04/26] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 15:13 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 18:05 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 05/26] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 18:18 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 06/26] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 11:30 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 07/26] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 08/26] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:42 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 09/26] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:46 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 10/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:49 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/26] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 12/26] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 13/26] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 14/26] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 15/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 16/26] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 17/26] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 18/26] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 19/26] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 20/26] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 21/26] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 22/26] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 23/26] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 24/26] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 25/26] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 17:17 ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 26/26] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 17:22 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 18:24 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:30 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev9) Patchwork
2024-10-08 7:32 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-08 8:12 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-08 10:44 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a4e7b14-b55e-4ea2-a044-b48fe711a887@intel.com \
--to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox