Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/26] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:18:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a2d20a3-692c-476d-90c5-ea10c376b9d3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241008071115.1862704-6-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>



On 08.10.2024 09:10, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> Instead of calling xe_force_wake_put on all domains that were input to
> xe_force_wake_get, call _put only on the domains whose reference counts
> were successfully incremented by the _get call. Since the return value
> of _get can be a mask that does not match any specific value in the enum
> xe_force_wake_domains, change the input parameter of _put to unsigned int.
> 
> v3
> - Move WARN to this patch (Badal)
> - use xe_gt_WARN instead of XE_WARN (Michal)
> - Stop using xe_force_wake_domains for non enum values.
> - Remove kernel-doc from this patch (Badal)
> 
> -v5
> - Fix global awake_domain
> 
> -v6
> - put all initialized domains in case of FORCEWAKE_ALL.
> - Modify ret variable name (Michal)
> - Modify input var name (Michal)
> - Modify commit message and warn (Badal)
> 
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> index bfba276c48ac..7ff2588a8c47 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> @@ -213,26 +213,40 @@ unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>  }
>  
>  int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> -		      enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
> +		      unsigned int fw_ref)
>  {
>  	struct xe_gt *gt = fw->gt;
>  	struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
> -	enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, sleep = 0;
> +	unsigned int tmp, sleep = 0;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int ack_fail = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Avoid unnecessary lock and unlock when the function is called
> +	 * in error path of individual domains.
> +	 */
> +	if (!fw_ref)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (fw_ref == XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL)
> +		fw_ref = fw->initialized_domains;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
> -	for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
> +	for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, fw_ref, fw, tmp) {
>  		if (!--domain->ref) {

shouldn't we assert that ref is non zero?

but otherwise LGTM so,

Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

>  			sleep |= BIT(domain->id);
>  			domain_sleep(gt, domain);
>  		}
>  	}
>  	for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, sleep, fw, tmp) {
> -		ret |= domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain);
> +		if (domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain) == 0)
> +			fw->awake_domains &= ~BIT(domain->id);
> +		else
> +			ack_fail |= BIT(domain->id);
>  	}
> -	fw->awake_domains &= ~sleep;
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	xe_gt_WARN(gt, ack_fail, "Forcewake domain%s %#x failed to acknowledge sleep request\n",
> +		   str_plural(hweight_long(ack_fail)), ack_fail);
> +	return ack_fail;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> index 75fa1a19797c..f0b27dbe7581 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt,
>  unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>  			       enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
>  int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> -		      enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
> +		      unsigned int fw_ref);
>  
>  static inline int
>  xe_force_wake_ref(struct xe_force_wake *fw,


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-08 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-08  7:10 [PATCH v8 00/26] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  6:58 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev9) Patchwork
2024-10-08  6:59 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-08  7:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 01/26] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:55   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:03   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 02/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Change awake_domain datatype Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:56   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:04   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 03/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Add a helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:58   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:07   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 04/26] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 15:13   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 18:05   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 05/26] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 18:18   ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 06/26] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 11:30   ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 07/26] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 08/26] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:42   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 09/26] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:46   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 10/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:49   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/26] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 12/26] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 13/26] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 14/26] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 15/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 16/26] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 17/26] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 18/26] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 19/26] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 20/26] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 21/26] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 22/26] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 23/26] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 24/26] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 25/26] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 17:17   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 26/26] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 17:22   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 18:24   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:30 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev9) Patchwork
2024-10-08  7:32 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-08  8:12 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-08 10:44 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5a2d20a3-692c-476d-90c5-ea10c376b9d3@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox