From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/26] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:18:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a2d20a3-692c-476d-90c5-ea10c376b9d3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241008071115.1862704-6-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
On 08.10.2024 09:10, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> Instead of calling xe_force_wake_put on all domains that were input to
> xe_force_wake_get, call _put only on the domains whose reference counts
> were successfully incremented by the _get call. Since the return value
> of _get can be a mask that does not match any specific value in the enum
> xe_force_wake_domains, change the input parameter of _put to unsigned int.
>
> v3
> - Move WARN to this patch (Badal)
> - use xe_gt_WARN instead of XE_WARN (Michal)
> - Stop using xe_force_wake_domains for non enum values.
> - Remove kernel-doc from this patch (Badal)
>
> -v5
> - Fix global awake_domain
>
> -v6
> - put all initialized domains in case of FORCEWAKE_ALL.
> - Modify ret variable name (Michal)
> - Modify input var name (Michal)
> - Modify commit message and warn (Badal)
>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> index bfba276c48ac..7ff2588a8c47 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> @@ -213,26 +213,40 @@ unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> }
>
> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains)
> + unsigned int fw_ref)
> {
> struct xe_gt *gt = fw->gt;
> struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
> - enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, sleep = 0;
> + unsigned int tmp, sleep = 0;
> unsigned long flags;
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ack_fail = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Avoid unnecessary lock and unlock when the function is called
> + * in error path of individual domains.
> + */
> + if (!fw_ref)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (fw_ref == XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL)
> + fw_ref = fw->initialized_domains;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
> - for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
> + for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, fw_ref, fw, tmp) {
> if (!--domain->ref) {
shouldn't we assert that ref is non zero?
but otherwise LGTM so,
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> sleep |= BIT(domain->id);
> domain_sleep(gt, domain);
> }
> }
> for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, sleep, fw, tmp) {
> - ret |= domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain);
> + if (domain_sleep_wait(gt, domain) == 0)
> + fw->awake_domains &= ~BIT(domain->id);
> + else
> + ack_fail |= BIT(domain->id);
> }
> - fw->awake_domains &= ~sleep;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
>
> - return ret;
> + xe_gt_WARN(gt, ack_fail, "Forcewake domain%s %#x failed to acknowledge sleep request\n",
> + str_plural(hweight_long(ack_fail)), ack_fail);
> + return ack_fail;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> index 75fa1a19797c..f0b27dbe7581 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt,
> unsigned int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
> int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> - enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
> + unsigned int fw_ref);
>
> static inline int
> xe_force_wake_ref(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-08 7:10 [PATCH v8 00/26] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 6:58 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev9) Patchwork
2024-10-08 6:59 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-08 7:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 01/26] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:55 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:03 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 02/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Change awake_domain datatype Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:56 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:04 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 03/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Add a helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:58 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:07 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 04/26] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 15:13 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 18:05 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 05/26] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 18:18 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 06/26] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 11:30 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 07/26] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 08/26] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:42 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 09/26] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:46 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 7:10 ` [PATCH v8 10/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:49 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/26] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 12/26] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 13/26] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 14/26] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 15/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 16/26] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 17/26] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 18/26] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 19/26] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 20/26] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 21/26] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 22/26] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 23/26] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 24/26] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 25/26] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 17:17 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 7:11 ` [PATCH v8 26/26] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 17:22 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 18:24 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08 7:30 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev9) Patchwork
2024-10-08 7:32 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-08 8:12 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-08 10:44 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a2d20a3-692c-476d-90c5-ea10c376b9d3@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox