Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/26] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake()
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:25:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9585a672-7b7c-48c9-ac42-b13e3836dc15@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241008071115.1862704-2-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>



On 08-10-2024 12:40, Himal Prasad Ghimiray wrote:
> This field serves as a bitmask representing all initialized forcewake
> domains on the GT.
> 
> v2
> - Move awake_domains datatype change out of this patch (Michal)
> - Rename domain_init to init_domain (Michal)
> - optimize alignment (Michal)
> 
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c       | 30 ++++++++++++++----------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h |  2 ++
>   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> index a64c14757c84..ac0419da7173 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
> @@ -21,15 +21,25 @@ static const char *str_wake_sleep(bool wake)
>   	return wake ? "wake" : "sleep";
>   }
>   
> -static void domain_init(struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain,
> +static void mark_domain_initialized(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
> +				    enum xe_force_wake_domain_id id)
> +{
> +	fw->initialized_domains |= BIT(id);
> +}
> +
> +static void init_domain(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>   			enum xe_force_wake_domain_id id,
>   			struct xe_reg reg, struct xe_reg ack)
>   {
> +	struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain = &fw->domains[id];
> +
>   	domain->id = id;
>   	domain->reg_ctl = reg;
>   	domain->reg_ack = ack;
>   	domain->val = FORCEWAKE_MT(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL);
>   	domain->mask = FORCEWAKE_MT_MASK(FORCEWAKE_KERNEL);
> +
> +	mark_domain_initialized(fw, id);
>   }
>   
>   void xe_force_wake_init_gt(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
> @@ -43,13 +53,11 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_gt(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>   	xe_gt_assert(gt, GRAPHICS_VER(gt_to_xe(gt)) >= 11);
>   
>   	if (xe->info.graphics_verx100 >= 1270) {
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT,
> +		init_domain(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_GT,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_GT_MTL);
>   	} else {
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT,
> +		init_domain(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_GT,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_GT);
>   	}
> @@ -63,8 +71,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>   	xe_gt_assert(gt, GRAPHICS_VER(gt_to_xe(gt)) >= 11);
>   
>   	if (!xe_gt_is_media_type(gt))
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER,
> +		init_domain(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_RENDER,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_RENDER);
>   
> @@ -72,8 +79,7 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>   		if (!(gt->info.engine_mask & BIT(i)))
>   			continue;
>   
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0 + j],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0 + j,
> +		init_domain(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0 + j,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_MEDIA_VDBOX(j),
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_MEDIA_VDBOX(j));
>   	}
> @@ -82,15 +88,13 @@ void xe_force_wake_init_engines(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_force_wake *fw)
>   		if (!(gt->info.engine_mask & BIT(i)))
>   			continue;
>   
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0 + j],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0 + j,
> +		init_domain(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0 + j,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_MEDIA_VEBOX(j),
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_MEDIA_VEBOX(j));
>   	}
>   
>   	if (gt->info.engine_mask & BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_GSCCS0))
> -		domain_init(&fw->domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC],
> -			    XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC,
> +		init_domain(fw, XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_GSC,
>   			    FORCEWAKE_ACK_GSC);
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
> index ed0edc2cdf9f..494240777d03 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake_types.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ struct xe_force_wake {
>   	spinlock_t lock;
>   	/** @awake_domains: mask of all domains awake */
>   	enum xe_force_wake_domains awake_domains;
> +	/** @initialized_domains: mask of all initialized domains */
> +	unsigned int initialized_domains;
>   	/** @domains: force wake domains */
>   	struct xe_force_wake_domain domains[XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_COUNT];
>   };

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>

Regards,
Badal


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-08 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-08  7:10 [PATCH v8 00/26] Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  6:58 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev9) Patchwork
2024-10-08  6:59 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-08  7:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 01/26] drm/xe: Add member initialized_domains to xe_force_wake() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:55   ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2024-10-08 17:03   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 02/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Change awake_domain datatype Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:56   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:04   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 03/26] drm/xe/forcewake: Add a helper xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 14:58   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 17:07   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 04/26] drm/xe: Error handling in xe_force_wake_get() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 15:13   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 18:05   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 05/26] drm/xe: Modify xe_force_wake_put to handle _get returned mask Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 18:18   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 06/26] drm/xe/device: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 11:30   ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 07/26] drm/xe/hdcp: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 08/26] drm/xe/gsc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:42   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 09/26] drm/xe/gt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:46   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08  7:10 ` [PATCH v8 10/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_idle: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-09 12:49   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/26] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 12/26] drm/xe/tests/mocs: Update xe_force_wake_get() return handling Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 13/26] drm/xe/mocs: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 14/26] drm/xe/xe_drm_client: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 15/26] drm/xe/xe_gt_debugfs: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 16/26] drm/xe/guc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 17/26] drm/xe/huc: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 18/26] drm/xe/oa: Handle force_wake_get failure in xe_oa_stream_init() Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 19/26] drm/xe/pat: Update handling of xe_force_wake_get return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 20/26] drm/xe/gt_tlb_invalidation_ggtt: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 21/26] drm/xe/xe_reg_sr: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 22/26] drm/xe/query: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 23/26] drm/xe/vram: " Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 24/26] drm/xe: forcewake debugfs open fails on xe_forcewake_get failure Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 25/26] drm/xe: Ensure __must_check for xe_force_wake_get() return Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 17:17   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08  7:11 ` [PATCH v8 26/26] drm/xe: Change return type to void for xe_force_wake_put Himal Prasad Ghimiray
2024-10-08 17:22   ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-08 18:24   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-10-08  7:30 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: success for Fix xe_force_wake_get() failure handling (rev9) Patchwork
2024-10-08  7:32 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-10-08  8:12 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-08 10:44 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9585a672-7b7c-48c9-ac42-b13e3836dc15@intel.com \
    --to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox