From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
<imre.deak@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc for mst
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:02:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f8fcef2-2f5b-4eee-b30d-a1645a636587@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cyhvudoc.fsf@intel.com>
On 12/13/2024 3:07 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2024, Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> wrote:
>> Similar to DP, set the dsc limits->pipe.max/min_bpp early for MST too.
>> Use the limits while computing the compressed bpp.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> I think we should take this one step further with [1], basically
> eradicating mst_stream_compute_config_limits(). Indeed, I'd like to get
> that merged first.
Makes sense, will wait for the above to get merged.
Thanks & Regards,
Ankit
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241211144310.701895-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
>
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 3 +++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 11 +++++------
>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> index fe0957e028bc..c5740b8d2315 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -2504,7 +2504,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -static void
>> +void
>> intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> struct link_config_limits *limits)
>> {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>> index 4895b52d41e8..45b37d322565 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
>> @@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>> bool dsc,
>> struct link_config_limits *limits);
>> +void
>> +intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> + struct link_config_limits *limits);
>>
>> void intel_dp_get_dsc_sink_cap(u8 dpcd_rev, struct intel_connector *connector);
>> bool intel_dp_has_gamut_metadata_dip(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> index 795594191717..667006918bfd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>> @@ -365,14 +365,10 @@ static int mst_stream_dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>> int i, num_bpc;
>> u8 dsc_bpc[3] = {};
>> int min_bpp, max_bpp, sink_min_bpp, sink_max_bpp;
>> - int dsc_max_bpc, dsc_min_bpc;
>> int min_compressed_bpp, max_compressed_bpp;
>>
>> - dsc_max_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc(display);
>> - dsc_min_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc();
>> -
>> - max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpc * 3, limits->pipe.max_bpp);
>> - min_bpp = max(dsc_min_bpc * 3, limits->pipe.min_bpp);
>> + max_bpp = limits->pipe.max_bpp;
>> + min_bpp = limits->pipe.min_bpp;
>>
>> num_bpc = drm_dp_dsc_sink_supported_input_bpcs(connector->dp.dsc_dpcd,
>> dsc_bpc);
>> @@ -574,6 +570,9 @@ mst_stream_compute_config_limits(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>
>> intel_dp_test_compute_config(intel_dp, crtc_state, limits);
>>
>> + if (dsc)
>> + intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp_limits(intel_dp, limits);
>> +
>> if (!intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits(intel_dp,
>> crtc_state,
>> dsc,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-13 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-04 9:26 [PATCH 00/14] DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/dp: Refactor FEC support check in intel_dp_supports_dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-11 4:47 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/dp: Return early if DSC not supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/dp: Separate out helper for compute fec_enable Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-05 6:18 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dp: Drop check for FEC in intel_dp_fec_compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-05 6:26 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-13 12:28 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/dp: Remove HAS_DSC macro for intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 16:08 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/dp: Return int from dsc_max/min_src_input_bpc helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/dp: Use intel_display in intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc() Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 16:09 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Use helpers to get dsc min/max input bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-05 6:29 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/dp: Drop max_requested_bpc for dsc pipe_min/max bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/dp: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc for mst Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-13 9:37 ` Jani Nikula
2024-12-13 12:32 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/dp: Use clamp for pipe_bpp limits with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Make dsc helpers accept const crtc_state pointers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/dp: Set the DSC link limits intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-11 4:49 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:50 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes (rev3) Patchwork
2024-12-04 9:50 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-12-04 9:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-12-04 10:09 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-12-04 10:12 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-12-04 10:13 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-12-04 10:34 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-12-04 11:28 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f8fcef2-2f5b-4eee-b30d-a1645a636587@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox