From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, suraj.kandpal@intel.com,
jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dp: Drop check for FEC in intel_dp_fec_compute_config
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 14:56:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241204092642.1835807-5-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241204092642.1835807-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Support for FEC is already checked in intel_dp_supports_dsc().
Therefore the check can be dropped from the helper
intel_dp_fec_compute_config.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index ccc495842518..d48fa94b2705 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -2345,7 +2345,6 @@ static int intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
}
static void intel_dp_fec_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
- const struct intel_connector *connector,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
if (crtc_state->fec_enable)
@@ -2359,9 +2358,6 @@ static void intel_dp_fec_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
return;
- if (!intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, connector, crtc_state))
- return;
-
if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state))
return;
@@ -2384,7 +2380,7 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
int num_joined_pipes = intel_crtc_num_joined_pipes(pipe_config);
int ret;
- intel_dp_fec_compute_config(intel_dp, connector, pipe_config);
+ intel_dp_fec_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config);
if (!intel_dp_dsc_supports_format(connector, pipe_config->output_format))
return -EINVAL;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-04 9:26 [PATCH 00/14] DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/dp: Refactor FEC support check in intel_dp_supports_dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-11 4:47 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/dp: Return early if DSC not supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/dp: Separate out helper for compute fec_enable Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-05 6:18 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:26 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2024-12-05 6:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dp: Drop check for FEC in intel_dp_fec_compute_config Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-13 12:28 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/dp: Remove HAS_DSC macro for intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 16:08 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/dp: Return int from dsc_max/min_src_input_bpc helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/dp: Use intel_display in intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc() Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 16:09 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Use helpers to get dsc min/max input bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-05 6:29 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/dp: Drop max_requested_bpc for dsc pipe_min/max bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/dp: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc for mst Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-13 9:37 ` Jani Nikula
2024-12-13 12:32 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/dp: Use clamp for pipe_bpp limits with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Make dsc helpers accept const crtc_state pointers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-04 9:26 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/dp: Set the DSC link limits intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-11 4:49 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-12-04 9:50 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes (rev3) Patchwork
2024-12-04 9:50 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-12-04 9:51 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-12-04 10:09 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-12-04 10:12 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-12-04 10:13 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-12-04 10:34 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-12-04 11:28 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-17 9:32 [PATCH 00/14] DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-17 9:32 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dp: Drop check for FEC in intel_dp_fec_compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2024-12-17 10:57 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241204092642.1835807-5-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox