Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
To: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/xe/uapi: Add a query flag for has_device_atomics_on_smem
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:08:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <109eb32e-99c9-49a0-8166-42ed59e67662@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240415145214.25641-8-nirmoy.das@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2868 bytes --]

On 15/04/2024 17:52, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Add a query flag for xe->info.has_device_atomics_on_smem
> as this is platform dependent. This flag can be use to inform
> whether DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_DEVICE_ATOMICS can be effectively
> applied for a given platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das<nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c | 3 +++
>   include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h     | 5 ++++-
>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> index df407d73e5f5..43272fdd5442 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> @@ -336,6 +336,9 @@ static int query_config(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_xe_device_query *query)
>   	if (xe_device_get_root_tile(xe)->mem.vram.usable_size)
>   		config->info[DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS] =
>   			DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_VRAM;
> +	if (xe->info.has_device_atomics_on_smem)
> +		config->info[DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS] |=
> +			DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_DEV_ATOMIC_ON_SMEM;
>   	config->info[DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_MIN_ALIGNMENT] =
>   		xe->info.vram_flags & XE_VRAM_FLAGS_NEED64K ? SZ_64K : SZ_4K;
>   	config->info[DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_VA_BITS] = xe->info.va_bits;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> index ca4447e10ac9..80fff6fe3199 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> @@ -389,6 +389,8 @@ struct drm_xe_query_mem_regions {
>    *
>    *    - %DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_VRAM - Flag is set if the device
>    *      has usable VRAM
> + *    - %DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_DEV_ATOMIC_ON_SMEM - Flag is set if the device
> + *      supports device atomics on system memory
>    *  - %DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_MIN_ALIGNMENT - Minimal memory alignment
>    *    required by this device, typically SZ_4K or SZ_64K
>    *  - %DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_VA_BITS - Maximum bits of a virtual address
> @@ -404,7 +406,8 @@ struct drm_xe_query_config {
>   
>   #define DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_REV_AND_DEVICE_ID	0
>   #define DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS			1
> -	#define DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_VRAM	(1 << 0)
> +	#define DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_VRAM		(1 << 0)
> +	#define DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_DEV_ATOMIC_ON_SMEM	(1 << 1)


I find this flag a bit confusing, because it would imply that platforms 
that do not report this flag don't suppoort atomics on smem.

But for DG2/MTL/TGL (if officially supported by Xe), that's not the 
case, yet they do support this.


Maybe renaming this 
toDRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAG_HAS_EXPLICIT_DEV_ATOMIC_ON_SMEM would make 
more sense.

Meaning the platform requires a specific vm_bind flag to get atomics 
working on SMEM only BO.

-Lionel


>   #define DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_MIN_ALIGNMENT		2
>   #define DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_VA_BITS			3
>   #define DRM_XE_QUERY_CONFIG_MAX_EXEC_QUEUE_PRIORITY	4


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3690 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-19  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15 14:52 [PATCH v3 0/7] Enable device atomics with a VM bind flag Nirmoy Das
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/xe: Introduce has_atomic_enable_pte_bit device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 16:06   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/xe: Consolidate setting PTE_AE into one place Nirmoy Das
2024-04-16 14:33   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 18:35   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-22  8:18     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/xe: Add function to check if BO has single placement Nirmoy Das
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe: Move vm bind bo validation to a helper function Nirmoy Das
2024-04-16  0:55   ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-16 13:32     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 20:14   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/xe: Introduce has_device_atomics_on_smem device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 20:24   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/xe/uapi: Introduce VMA bind flag for device atomics Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19  7:16   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2024-04-22  8:39     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 21:04   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-22 10:12     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-22 21:39       ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-23 12:33         ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/xe/uapi: Add a query flag for has_device_atomics_on_smem Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19  7:08   ` Lionel Landwerlin [this message]
2024-04-22  8:53     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 21:06   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-15 21:19 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Enable device atomics with a VM bind flag (rev3) Patchwork
2024-04-15 21:19 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 21:21 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 21:37 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 21:40 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 21:41 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 22:22 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-16 13:46 ` ✓ CI.FULL: success " Patchwork
2024-04-19  7:17 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Enable device atomics with a VM bind flag Lionel Landwerlin
2024-04-22 10:13   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-22 14:50 ` Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=109eb32e-99c9-49a0-8166-42ed59e67662@intel.com \
    --to=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox