Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe: Move vm bind bo validation to a helper function
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:55:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh3Mfac/UZ+6K8g3@DUT025-TGLU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240415145214.25641-5-nirmoy.das@intel.com>

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 04:52:11PM +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Move vm bind bo validation to a helper function to make the
> xe_vm_bind_ioctl() more readable.
> 

Change logs are helpful for reviewers but not going to hold up this
patch.

With that:
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> 

> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index b1dcaa35b6cc..8380f1d23074 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -2872,6 +2872,46 @@ static int vm_bind_ioctl_signal_fences(struct xe_vm *vm,
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> +static int xe_vm_bind_ioctl_validate_bo(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
> +					u64 addr, u64 range, u64 obj_offset,
> +					u16 pat_index)
> +{
> +	u16 coh_mode;
> +
> +	if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, range > bo->size) ||
> +	    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, obj_offset >
> +			 bo->size - range)) {
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (bo->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_INTERNAL_64K) {
> +		if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, obj_offset &
> +				 XE_64K_PAGE_MASK) ||
> +		    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, addr & XE_64K_PAGE_MASK) ||
> +		    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, range & XE_64K_PAGE_MASK)) {
> +			return  -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	coh_mode = xe_pat_index_get_coh_mode(xe, pat_index);
> +	if (bo->cpu_caching) {
> +		if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, coh_mode == XE_COH_NONE &&
> +				 bo->cpu_caching == DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WB)) {
> +			return  -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	} else if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, coh_mode == XE_COH_NONE)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Imported dma-buf from a different device should
> +		 * require 1way or 2way coherency since we don't know
> +		 * how it was mapped on the CPU. Just assume is it
> +		 * potentially cached on CPU side.
> +		 */
> +		return  -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
>  {
>  	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
> @@ -2955,7 +2995,6 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
>  		u32 obj = bind_ops[i].obj;
>  		u64 obj_offset = bind_ops[i].obj_offset;
>  		u16 pat_index = bind_ops[i].pat_index;
> -		u16 coh_mode;
>  
>  		if (!obj)
>  			continue;
> @@ -2967,40 +3006,10 @@ int xe_vm_bind_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
>  		}
>  		bos[i] = gem_to_xe_bo(gem_obj);
>  
> -		if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, range > bos[i]->size) ||
> -		    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, obj_offset >
> -				 bos[i]->size - range)) {
> -			err = -EINVAL;
> -			goto put_obj;
> -		}
> -
> -		if (bos[i]->flags & XE_BO_FLAG_INTERNAL_64K) {
> -			if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, obj_offset &
> -					 XE_64K_PAGE_MASK) ||
> -			    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, addr & XE_64K_PAGE_MASK) ||
> -			    XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, range & XE_64K_PAGE_MASK)) {
> -				err = -EINVAL;
> -				goto put_obj;
> -			}
> -		}
> -
> -		coh_mode = xe_pat_index_get_coh_mode(xe, pat_index);
> -		if (bos[i]->cpu_caching) {
> -			if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, coh_mode == XE_COH_NONE &&
> -					 bos[i]->cpu_caching == DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WB)) {
> -				err = -EINVAL;
> -				goto put_obj;
> -			}
> -		} else if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, coh_mode == XE_COH_NONE)) {
> -			/*
> -			 * Imported dma-buf from a different device should
> -			 * require 1way or 2way coherency since we don't know
> -			 * how it was mapped on the CPU. Just assume is it
> -			 * potentially cached on CPU side.
> -			 */
> -			err = -EINVAL;
> +		err = xe_vm_bind_ioctl_validate_bo(xe, bos[i], addr, range,
> +						   obj_offset, pat_index);
> +		if (err)
>  			goto put_obj;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (args->num_syncs) {
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-16  0:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-15 14:52 [PATCH v3 0/7] Enable device atomics with a VM bind flag Nirmoy Das
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/xe: Introduce has_atomic_enable_pte_bit device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 16:06   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/xe: Consolidate setting PTE_AE into one place Nirmoy Das
2024-04-16 14:33   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 18:35   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-22  8:18     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/xe: Add function to check if BO has single placement Nirmoy Das
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe: Move vm bind bo validation to a helper function Nirmoy Das
2024-04-16  0:55   ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2024-04-16 13:32     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 20:14   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/xe: Introduce has_device_atomics_on_smem device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 20:24   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/xe/uapi: Introduce VMA bind flag for device atomics Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19  7:16   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2024-04-22  8:39     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 21:04   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-22 10:12     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-22 21:39       ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-23 12:33         ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-15 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/xe/uapi: Add a query flag for has_device_atomics_on_smem Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19  7:08   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2024-04-22  8:53     ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-19 21:06   ` Zeng, Oak
2024-04-15 21:19 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Enable device atomics with a VM bind flag (rev3) Patchwork
2024-04-15 21:19 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 21:21 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 21:37 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 21:40 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 21:41 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-15 22:22 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-16 13:46 ` ✓ CI.FULL: success " Patchwork
2024-04-19  7:17 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Enable device atomics with a VM bind flag Lionel Landwerlin
2024-04-22 10:13   ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-22 14:50 ` Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zh3Mfac/UZ+6K8g3@DUT025-TGLU \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox