Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, suraj.kandpal@intel.com,
	ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 20:52:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240927152241.4014909-17-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927152241.4014909-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Use the check for ultrajoiner while computing maxdotclock.

v2: Add Check for HAS_UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER. (Ville)
v3: Remove extraneous newline. (Ville)

Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 40ad3fdaab10..74311bb9d290 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -8186,8 +8186,9 @@ static int max_dotclock(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 {
 	int max_dotclock = i915->display.cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
 
-	/* icl+ might use joiner */
-	if (HAS_BIGJOINER(i915))
+	if (HAS_ULTRAJOINER(i915))
+		max_dotclock *= 4;
+	else if (HAS_UNCOMPRESSED_JOINER(i915) || HAS_BIGJOINER(i915))
 		max_dotclock *= 2;
 
 	return max_dotclock;
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-27 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-27 15:22 [PATCH 00/17] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 01/17] drm/i915/display_device: Add Check HAS_DSC for bigjoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 02/17] drm/i915/display_debugfs: Allow force joiner only if supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 03/17] drm/i915/display: Modify debugfs for joiner to force n pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915/dp: Add helper to compute num pipes required Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 05/17] drm/i915: Split current joiner hw state readout Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner and uncompressed joiner hw readout sanity checks Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_ULTRAJOINER() Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915/display: Refactor enable_joiner_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 09/17] drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 10/17] drm/i915/display/vdsc: Add ultrajoiner support with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915/dp: Refactor joiner max_bpp calculations into separate functions Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:43   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 12/17] drm/i915/dp: Use num_joined_pipes in bigjoiner_bw_max_bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:44   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915/dp: Modify compressed bpp limitations for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:55   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-27 17:04   ` Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 14/17] drm/i915/dp: Simplify helper to get slice count with joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 15/17] drm/i915: Compute config and mode valid changes for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 15:22 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2024-09-27 15:22 ` [PATCH 17/17] drm/i915/intel_dp: Add support for forcing ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27 17:16 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev6) Patchwork
2024-09-27 17:17 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-27 17:18 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-27 17:29 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-27 17:31 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-27 17:33 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-27 18:03 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-27 19:38 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev7) Patchwork
2024-09-27 19:39 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-27 19:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-27 19:51 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-27 19:54 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-27 19:55 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-27 20:20 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-30  6:03 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev6) Patchwork
2024-09-30  6:38 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev7) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-27  8:38 [PATCH 00/17] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-27  8:38 ` [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240927152241.4014909-17-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox