Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maarten@mblankhorst.nl, Lankhorst@mblankhorst.nl,
	dev@lankhorst.se
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display
Date: Thu,  7 Nov 2024 11:01:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241107100140.292928-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241107100140.292928-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Instead of 3 different calls, it should be safe to unify to a single
call now. This makes the init sequence cleaner, and display less
tangled.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241105121857.17389-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst,,, <dev@lankhorst.se>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 72 +++++++------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h |  8 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c          | 10 +---
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
index b5502f335f531..a9ce4f561e7aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
@@ -100,31 +100,7 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe)
 	return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, display_destroy, NULL);
 }
 
-static void xe_display_fini_nommio(struct drm_device *dev, void *dummy)
-{
-	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
-
-	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
-		return;
-
-	intel_power_domains_cleanup(xe);
-}
-
-int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
-	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
-		return 0;
-
-	/* Fake uncore lock */
-	spin_lock_init(&xe->uncore.lock);
-
-	/* This must be called before any calls to HAS_PCH_* */
-	intel_detect_pch(xe);
-
-	return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_display_fini_nommio, xe);
-}
-
-static void xe_display_fini_noirq(void *arg)
+static void xe_display_fini_early(void *arg)
 {
 	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
 	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
@@ -132,11 +108,13 @@ static void xe_display_fini_noirq(void *arg)
 	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
 		return;
 
+	intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(xe);
 	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(xe);
 	intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
+	intel_power_domains_cleanup(xe);
 }
 
-int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
+int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
 {
 	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
 	int err;
@@ -144,6 +122,12 @@ int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
 	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
 		return 0;
 
+	/* Fake uncore lock */
+	spin_lock_init(&xe->uncore.lock);
+
+	/* This must be called before any calls to HAS_PCH_* */
+	intel_detect_pch(xe);
+
 	intel_display_driver_early_probe(xe);
 
 	/* Early display init.. */
@@ -160,36 +144,20 @@ int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
 	intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(xe);
 
 	err = intel_display_driver_probe_noirq(xe);
-	if (err) {
-		intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
-		return err;
-	}
-
-	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noirq, xe);
-}
-
-static void xe_display_fini_noaccel(void *arg)
-{
-	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
-
-	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
-		return;
-
-	intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(xe);
-}
-
-int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe)
-{
-	int err;
-
-	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
-		return 0;
+	if (err)
+		goto err_opregion;
 
 	err = intel_display_driver_probe_nogem(xe);
 	if (err)
-		return err;
+		goto err_noirq;
 
-	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noaccel, xe);
+	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_early, xe);
+err_noirq:
+	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(xe);
+	intel_power_domains_cleanup(xe);
+err_opregion:
+	intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
+	return err;
 }
 
 int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
index 17afa537aee50..255cffa328160 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
@@ -20,9 +20,7 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe);
 
 int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
 
-int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe);
-int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe);
-int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe);
+int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
 int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe);
 void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
 
@@ -53,9 +51,7 @@ static inline int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
 
 static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
 
-static inline int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
-static inline int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
+static inline int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
 static inline int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
 static inline void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe) {}
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
index b9948b2dc8d1d..f1147ebeeff31 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
@@ -632,10 +632,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
 		return err;
 
 	xe->info.mem_region_mask = 1;
-	err = xe_display_init_nommio(xe);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
 	err = xe_set_dma_info(xe);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -687,10 +683,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	err = xe_display_init_noirq(xe);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
 	err = probe_has_flat_ccs(xe);
 	if (err)
 		goto err;
@@ -718,7 +710,7 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
 	 * This is the reason the first allocation needs to be done
 	 * inside display.
 	 */
-	err = xe_display_init_noaccel(xe);
+	err = xe_display_init_early(xe);
 	if (err)
 		goto err;
 
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-07 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-07 10:01 [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 11:36   ` [PATCH] " Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 12:21     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-11-07 17:45       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/xe: Move suballocator init to after display init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-12 18:18   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/xe: Defer irq init until after xe_display_init_noaccel Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-12 18:21   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-07 10:01 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2024-11-12 18:39   ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-13 10:30     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-14 16:05       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/xe/sriov: Move VF bootstrap and query_config to vf_guc_init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-14 16:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-15 14:21     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-15 19:06       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-15 19:50         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-15 20:02           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-15 20:51             ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/xe: Simplify GuC early initialisation Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/xe: Make it possible to read instance0 MCR registers after xe_gt_mcr_init_early Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Split init of xe_gt_init_hwconfig to xe_gt_init and *_early Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:08 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/9] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Patchwork
2024-11-07 10:08 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-07 10:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-11-07 10:14 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-07 12:57 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/9] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip (rev2) Patchwork
2024-11-07 12:57 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-07 12:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-11-07 13:10 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-07 13:12 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-07 13:14 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-07 13:52 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-11-08 20:13 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-11-05 12:18 [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 12:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display Maarten Lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241107100140.292928-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Lankhorst@mblankhorst.nl \
    --cc=Maarten@mblankhorst.nl \
    --cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox