Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 06/33] squash! squash! drm/xe/forcewake: Create dedicated type for forcewake references
Date: Fri,  7 Nov 2025 10:13:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107181315.631642-41-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107181315.631642-35-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Additional xe_force_wake_ref conversions that are unusual and thus
weren't picked up automatically by Coccinelle and needed to be adjusted
by hand.  Most of these are cases where 'fw_ref' was declared on the
same line as other unsigned int variables (I'm sure there's a proper way
to split it out automatically in smpl, but I couldn't figure it out).

This will be squashed into the conversion patch before applying.  It
remains separate now to make the conversion easier to review.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c | 8 +++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c       | 3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c        | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
index 9c774b44328e..611050d49d0b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
@@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ static void read_l3cc_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
 			    const struct xe_mocs_info *info)
 {
 	struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
+	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 	u32 l3cc, l3cc_expected;
-	unsigned int fw_ref, i;
+	unsigned int i;
 	u32 reg_val;
 
 	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
@@ -81,15 +82,16 @@ static void read_mocs_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
 			    const struct xe_mocs_info *info)
 {
 	struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
+	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 	u32 mocs, mocs_expected;
-	unsigned int fw_ref, i;
+	unsigned int i;
 	u32 reg_val;
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE_MSG(test, info->unused_entries_index,
 			      "Unused entries index should have been defined\n");
 
 	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
-	KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, fw_ref, 0, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, fw_ref.domains, 0, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
 
 	for (i = 0; i < info->num_mocs_regs; i++) {
 		if (regs_are_mcr(gt))
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
index 73f9401d9907..7b7b71ef82f1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
@@ -811,7 +811,8 @@ int xe_mocs_dump(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
 	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
 	enum xe_force_wake_domains domain;
 	struct xe_mocs_info table;
-	unsigned int fw_ref, flags;
+	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
+	unsigned int flags;
 	int err = 0;
 
 	flags = get_mocs_settings(xe, &table);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c
index dbd95327f9fc..9c88e6159b32 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static bool event_gt_forcewake(struct perf_event *event)
 	struct xe_device *xe = container_of(event->pmu, typeof(*xe), pmu.base);
 	u64 config = event->attr.config;
 	struct xe_gt *gt;
-	unsigned int *fw_ref;
+	struct xe_force_wake_ref *fw_ref;
 
 	if (!is_engine_event(config) && !is_gt_frequency_event(event))
 		return true;
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static bool event_gt_forcewake(struct perf_event *event)
 		return false;
 
 	*fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
-	if (!*fw_ref) {
+	if (fw_ref->domains) {
 		kfree(fw_ref);
 		return false;
 	}
-- 
2.51.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07 18:13 [PATCH 00/33] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 01/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:33   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 02/33] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-07 19:52   ` Harish Chegondi
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 03/33] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 04/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Create dedicated type for forcewake references Matt Roper
2025-11-07 19:27   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-07 21:17     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 05/33] squash! " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 07/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 08/33] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 21:59   ` Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 09/33] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 10/33] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 11/33] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 12/33] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 13/33] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 14/33] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 15/33] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 16/33] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 17/33] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 18/33] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 19/33] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 20/33] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 21/33] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 22/33] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 23/33] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 24/33] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 25/33] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 26/33] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 27/33] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 28/33] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 29/33] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 30/33] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 31/33] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 32/33] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 33/33] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:18 ` [PATCH 00/33] Scope-based forcewake and " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 20:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-11-07 20:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-07 21:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-09  3:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251107181315.631642-41-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox