Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 16/33] drm/xe/gsc: Use scope-based cleanup
Date: Fri,  7 Nov 2025 10:13:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107181315.631642-51-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107181315.631642-35-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime PM to eliminate some
goto-based error handling and simplify other functions.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c       | 19 +++++--------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c | 17 +++++++----------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
index 59519c9023bd..aa1cec8f57bc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
@@ -353,7 +353,6 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct xe_gsc *gsc = container_of(work, typeof(*gsc), work);
 	struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
 	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
-	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 	u32 actions;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -362,13 +361,12 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	gsc->work_actions = 0;
 	spin_unlock_irq(&gsc->lock);
 
-	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
+	guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
+	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
 
 	if (actions & GSC_ACTION_ER_COMPLETE) {
-		ret = gsc_er_complete(gt);
-		if (ret)
-			goto out;
+		if (gsc_er_complete(gt))
+			return;
 	}
 
 	if (actions & GSC_ACTION_FW_LOAD) {
@@ -381,10 +379,6 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	if (actions & GSC_ACTION_SW_PROXY)
 		xe_gsc_proxy_request_handler(gsc);
-
-out:
-	xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
-	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
 }
 
 void xe_gsc_hwe_irq_handler(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, u16 intr_vec)
@@ -616,7 +610,6 @@ void xe_gsc_print_info(struct xe_gsc *gsc, struct drm_printer *p)
 {
 	struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
 	struct xe_mmio *mmio = &gt->mmio;
-	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 
 	xe_uc_fw_print(&gsc->fw, p);
 
@@ -625,7 +618,7 @@ void xe_gsc_print_info(struct xe_gsc *gsc, struct drm_printer *p)
 	if (!xe_uc_fw_is_enabled(&gsc->fw))
 		return;
 
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
+	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
 	if (!fw_ref.domains)
 		return;
 
@@ -636,6 +629,4 @@ void xe_gsc_print_info(struct xe_gsc *gsc, struct drm_printer *p)
 			xe_mmio_read32(mmio, HECI_FWSTS4(MTL_GSC_HECI1_BASE)),
 			xe_mmio_read32(mmio, HECI_FWSTS5(MTL_GSC_HECI1_BASE)),
 			xe_mmio_read32(mmio, HECI_FWSTS6(MTL_GSC_HECI1_BASE)));
-
-	xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c
index ba1211fe5a60..e7573a0c5e5d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c
@@ -440,22 +440,19 @@ static void xe_gsc_proxy_remove(void *arg)
 	struct xe_gsc *gsc = arg;
 	struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
 	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
-	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 
 	if (!gsc->proxy.component_added)
 		return;
 
 	/* disable HECI2 IRQs */
-	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
-	if (!fw_ref.domains)
-		xe_gt_err(gt, "failed to get forcewake to disable GSC interrupts\n");
+	scoped_guard(xe_pm_runtime, xe) {
+		CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
+		if (!fw_ref.domains)
+			xe_gt_err(gt, "failed to get forcewake to disable GSC interrupts\n");
 
-	/* try do disable irq even if forcewake failed */
-	gsc_proxy_irq_toggle(gsc, false);
-
-	xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
-	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
+		/* try do disable irq even if forcewake failed */
+		gsc_proxy_irq_toggle(gsc, false);
+	}
 
 	xe_gsc_wait_for_worker_completion(gsc);
 
-- 
2.51.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07 18:13 [PATCH 00/33] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 01/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:33   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 02/33] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-07 19:52   ` Harish Chegondi
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 03/33] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 04/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Create dedicated type for forcewake references Matt Roper
2025-11-07 19:27   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-07 21:17     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 05/33] squash! " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 06/33] squash! " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 07/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 08/33] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 21:59   ` Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 09/33] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 10/33] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 11/33] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 12/33] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 13/33] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 14/33] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 15/33] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 17/33] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 18/33] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 19/33] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 20/33] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 21/33] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 22/33] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 23/33] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 24/33] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 25/33] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 26/33] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 27/33] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 28/33] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 29/33] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 30/33] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 31/33] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 32/33] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 33/33] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:18 ` [PATCH 00/33] Scope-based forcewake and " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 20:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-11-07 20:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-07 21:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-09  3:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251107181315.631642-51-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox