From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 16/33] drm/xe/gsc: Use scope-based cleanup
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 10:13:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107181315.631642-51-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107181315.631642-35-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime PM to eliminate some
goto-based error handling and simplify other functions.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c | 19 +++++--------------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c | 17 +++++++----------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
index 59519c9023bd..aa1cec8f57bc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc.c
@@ -353,7 +353,6 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct xe_gsc *gsc = container_of(work, typeof(*gsc), work);
struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
- struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
u32 actions;
int ret;
@@ -362,13 +361,12 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
gsc->work_actions = 0;
spin_unlock_irq(&gsc->lock);
- xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
+ guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
if (actions & GSC_ACTION_ER_COMPLETE) {
- ret = gsc_er_complete(gt);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
+ if (gsc_er_complete(gt))
+ return;
}
if (actions & GSC_ACTION_FW_LOAD) {
@@ -381,10 +379,6 @@ static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (actions & GSC_ACTION_SW_PROXY)
xe_gsc_proxy_request_handler(gsc);
-
-out:
- xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
- xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
}
void xe_gsc_hwe_irq_handler(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, u16 intr_vec)
@@ -616,7 +610,6 @@ void xe_gsc_print_info(struct xe_gsc *gsc, struct drm_printer *p)
{
struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
struct xe_mmio *mmio = >->mmio;
- struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
xe_uc_fw_print(&gsc->fw, p);
@@ -625,7 +618,7 @@ void xe_gsc_print_info(struct xe_gsc *gsc, struct drm_printer *p)
if (!xe_uc_fw_is_enabled(&gsc->fw))
return;
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
if (!fw_ref.domains)
return;
@@ -636,6 +629,4 @@ void xe_gsc_print_info(struct xe_gsc *gsc, struct drm_printer *p)
xe_mmio_read32(mmio, HECI_FWSTS4(MTL_GSC_HECI1_BASE)),
xe_mmio_read32(mmio, HECI_FWSTS5(MTL_GSC_HECI1_BASE)),
xe_mmio_read32(mmio, HECI_FWSTS6(MTL_GSC_HECI1_BASE)));
-
- xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c
index ba1211fe5a60..e7573a0c5e5d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gsc_proxy.c
@@ -440,22 +440,19 @@ static void xe_gsc_proxy_remove(void *arg)
struct xe_gsc *gsc = arg;
struct xe_gt *gt = gsc_to_gt(gsc);
struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
- struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
if (!gsc->proxy.component_added)
return;
/* disable HECI2 IRQs */
- xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
- if (!fw_ref.domains)
- xe_gt_err(gt, "failed to get forcewake to disable GSC interrupts\n");
+ scoped_guard(xe_pm_runtime, xe) {
+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
+ if (!fw_ref.domains)
+ xe_gt_err(gt, "failed to get forcewake to disable GSC interrupts\n");
- /* try do disable irq even if forcewake failed */
- gsc_proxy_irq_toggle(gsc, false);
-
- xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
- xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
+ /* try do disable irq even if forcewake failed */
+ gsc_proxy_irq_toggle(gsc, false);
+ }
xe_gsc_wait_for_worker_completion(gsc);
--
2.51.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 18:13 [PATCH 00/33] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 01/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:33 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 02/33] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-07 19:52 ` Harish Chegondi
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 03/33] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 04/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Create dedicated type for forcewake references Matt Roper
2025-11-07 19:27 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-07 21:17 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 05/33] squash! " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 06/33] squash! " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 07/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 08/33] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 21:59 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 09/33] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 10/33] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 11/33] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 12/33] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 13/33] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 14/33] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 15/33] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 17/33] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 18/33] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 19/33] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 20/33] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 21/33] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 22/33] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 23/33] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 24/33] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 25/33] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 26/33] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 27/33] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 28/33] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 29/33] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 30/33] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 31/33] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 32/33] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 33/33] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:18 ` [PATCH 00/33] Scope-based forcewake and " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 20:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-11-07 20:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-07 21:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-09 3:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251107181315.631642-51-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox