Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 13/33] drm/xe/mocs: Use scope-based cleanup
Date: Fri,  7 Nov 2025 10:13:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107181315.631642-48-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107181315.631642-35-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Using scope-based cleanup for runtime PM and forcewake in the MOCS code
allows us to eliminate some goto-based error handling and simplify some
other functions.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c | 13 +++----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c       | 17 +++++------------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
index 611050d49d0b..16681a0f1f77 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_mocs.c
@@ -42,16 +42,13 @@ static void read_l3cc_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
 			    const struct xe_mocs_info *info)
 {
 	struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
-	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 	u32 l3cc, l3cc_expected;
 	unsigned int i;
 	u32 reg_val;
 
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
-	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL)) {
-		xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
+	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL))
 		KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, true, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
-	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < info->num_mocs_regs; i++) {
 		if (!(i & 1)) {
@@ -75,14 +72,12 @@ static void read_l3cc_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
 		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, l3cc_expected, l3cc,
 				    "l3cc idx=%u has incorrect val.\n", i);
 	}
-	xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
 }
 
 static void read_mocs_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
 			    const struct xe_mocs_info *info)
 {
 	struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
-	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 	u32 mocs, mocs_expected;
 	unsigned int i;
 	u32 reg_val;
@@ -90,7 +85,7 @@ static void read_mocs_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE_MSG(test, info->unused_entries_index,
 			      "Unused entries index should have been defined\n");
 
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, fw_ref.domains, 0, "Forcewake Failed.\n");
 
 	for (i = 0; i < info->num_mocs_regs; i++) {
@@ -108,8 +103,6 @@ static void read_mocs_table(struct xe_gt *gt,
 		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, mocs_expected, mocs,
 				    "mocs reg 0x%x has incorrect val.\n", i);
 	}
-
-	xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
 }
 
 static int mocs_kernel_test_run_device(struct xe_device *xe)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
index 7b7b71ef82f1..1c590fe5eca3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mocs.c
@@ -811,27 +811,20 @@ int xe_mocs_dump(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
 	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
 	enum xe_force_wake_domains domain;
 	struct xe_mocs_info table;
-	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 	unsigned int flags;
-	int err = 0;
 
 	flags = get_mocs_settings(xe, &table);
 
 	domain = flags & HAS_LNCF_MOCS ? XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL : XE_FW_GT;
-	xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), domain);
 
-	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, domain)) {
-		err = -ETIMEDOUT;
-		goto err_fw;
-	}
+	guard(xe_pm_runtime_noresume)(xe);
+	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), domain);
+	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, domain))
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 
 	table.ops->dump(&table, flags, gt, p);
 
-err_fw:
-	xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
-	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
-	return err;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_KUNIT_TEST)
-- 
2.51.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07 18:13 [PATCH 00/33] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 01/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:33   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 02/33] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-07 19:52   ` Harish Chegondi
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 03/33] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 04/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Create dedicated type for forcewake references Matt Roper
2025-11-07 19:27   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-07 21:17     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 05/33] squash! " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 06/33] squash! " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 07/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 08/33] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 21:59   ` Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 09/33] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 10/33] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 11/33] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 12/33] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 14/33] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 15/33] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 16/33] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 17/33] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 18/33] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 19/33] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 20/33] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 21/33] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 22/33] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 23/33] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 24/33] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 25/33] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 26/33] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 27/33] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 28/33] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 29/33] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 30/33] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 31/33] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 32/33] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 33/33] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:18 ` [PATCH 00/33] Scope-based forcewake and " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 20:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-11-07 20:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-07 21:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-09  3:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251107181315.631642-48-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox