Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 15/33] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup
Date: Fri,  7 Nov 2025 10:13:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107181315.631642-50-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107181315.631642-35-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime pm.  This allows us to
eliminate some goto-based error handling and simplify other functions.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pxp.c | 49 ++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pxp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pxp.c
index 5dc536189184..6f0dc791b4c1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pxp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pxp.c
@@ -58,10 +58,9 @@ bool xe_pxp_is_enabled(const struct xe_pxp *pxp)
 static bool pxp_prerequisites_done(const struct xe_pxp *pxp)
 {
 	struct xe_gt *gt = pxp->gt;
-	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 	bool ready;
 
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
+	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
 
 	/*
 	 * If force_wake fails we could falsely report the prerequisites as not
@@ -77,8 +76,6 @@ static bool pxp_prerequisites_done(const struct xe_pxp *pxp)
 	ready = xe_huc_is_authenticated(&gt->uc.huc, XE_HUC_AUTH_VIA_GSC) &&
 		xe_gsc_proxy_init_done(&gt->uc.gsc);
 
-	xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
-
 	return ready;
 }
 
@@ -104,13 +101,12 @@ int xe_pxp_get_readiness_status(struct xe_pxp *pxp)
 	    xe_uc_fw_status_to_error(pxp->gt->uc.gsc.fw.status))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	xe_pm_runtime_get(pxp->xe);
+	guard(xe_pm_runtime)(pxp->xe);
 
 	/* PXP requires both HuC loaded and GSC proxy initialized */
 	if (pxp_prerequisites_done(pxp))
 		ret = 1;
 
-	xe_pm_runtime_put(pxp->xe);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -135,35 +131,28 @@ static void pxp_invalidate_queues(struct xe_pxp *pxp);
 static int pxp_terminate_hw(struct xe_pxp *pxp)
 {
 	struct xe_gt *gt = pxp->gt;
-	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	drm_dbg(&pxp->xe->drm, "Terminating PXP\n");
 
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
-	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FW_GT)) {
-		ret = -EIO;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
+	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FW_GT))
+		return -EIO;
 
 	/* terminate the hw session */
 	ret = xe_pxp_submit_session_termination(pxp, ARB_SESSION);
 	if (ret)
-		goto out;
+		return ret;
 
 	ret = pxp_wait_for_session_state(pxp, ARB_SESSION, false);
 	if (ret)
-		goto out;
+		return ret;
 
 	/* Trigger full HW cleanup */
 	xe_mmio_write32(&gt->mmio, KCR_GLOBAL_TERMINATE, 1);
 
 	/* now we can tell the GSC to clean up its own state */
-	ret = xe_pxp_submit_session_invalidation(&pxp->gsc_res, ARB_SESSION);
-
-out:
-	xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
-	return ret;
+	return xe_pxp_submit_session_invalidation(&pxp->gsc_res, ARB_SESSION);
 }
 
 static void mark_termination_in_progress(struct xe_pxp *pxp)
@@ -326,14 +315,12 @@ static int kcr_pxp_set_status(const struct xe_pxp *pxp, bool enable)
 {
 	u32 val = enable ? _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(KCR_INIT_ALLOW_DISPLAY_ME_WRITES) :
 		  _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(KCR_INIT_ALLOW_DISPLAY_ME_WRITES);
-	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(pxp->gt), XE_FW_GT);
+	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(pxp->gt), XE_FW_GT);
 	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FW_GT))
 		return -EIO;
 
 	xe_mmio_write32(&pxp->gt->mmio, KCR_INIT, val);
-	xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -453,34 +440,28 @@ int xe_pxp_init(struct xe_device *xe)
 static int __pxp_start_arb_session(struct xe_pxp *pxp)
 {
 	int ret;
-	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(pxp->gt), XE_FW_GT);
+	CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(pxp->gt), XE_FW_GT);
 	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FW_GT))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	if (pxp_session_is_in_play(pxp, ARB_SESSION)) {
-		ret = -EEXIST;
-		goto out_force_wake;
-	}
+	if (pxp_session_is_in_play(pxp, ARB_SESSION))
+		return -EEXIST;
 
 	ret = xe_pxp_submit_session_init(&pxp->gsc_res, ARB_SESSION);
 	if (ret) {
 		drm_err(&pxp->xe->drm, "Failed to init PXP arb session: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
-		goto out_force_wake;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	ret = pxp_wait_for_session_state(pxp, ARB_SESSION, true);
 	if (ret) {
 		drm_err(&pxp->xe->drm, "PXP ARB session failed to go in play%pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
-		goto out_force_wake;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	drm_dbg(&pxp->xe->drm, "PXP ARB session is active\n");
-
-out_force_wake:
-	xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref);
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.51.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07 18:13 [PATCH 00/33] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 01/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:33   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 02/33] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-07 19:52   ` Harish Chegondi
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 03/33] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 04/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Create dedicated type for forcewake references Matt Roper
2025-11-07 19:27   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-07 21:17     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 05/33] squash! " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 06/33] squash! " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 07/33] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 08/33] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 21:59   ` Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 09/33] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 10/33] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 11/33] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 12/33] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 13/33] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 14/33] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 16/33] drm/xe/gsc: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 17/33] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 18/33] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 19/33] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 20/33] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 21/33] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 22/33] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 23/33] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 24/33] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 25/33] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 26/33] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 27/33] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 28/33] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 29/33] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 30/33] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 31/33] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 32/33] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:13 ` [PATCH 33/33] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-07 18:18 ` [PATCH 00/33] Scope-based forcewake and " Matt Roper
2025-11-07 20:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2025-11-07 20:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-07 21:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-09  3:59 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251107181315.631642-50-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox