From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/13] drm/xe/memirq: Introduce helper to calculate status vector offset
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:27:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260428142722.582-11-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260428142722.582-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
We already have XE_MEMIRQ_STATUS_OFFSET() macro, but it expects
that instance parameter will separately prepared based on the
MSI-X status. Add memirq_status_vector_offset() helper function
that will take care of this and by using engine specific offset,
return an offset to the engine's status vector bytes.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_memirq.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_memirq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_memirq.c
index 113b792d373e..f5e139f4525b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_memirq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_memirq.c
@@ -289,13 +289,25 @@ u32 xe_memirq_source_ptr(struct xe_memirq *memirq, struct xe_hw_engine *hwe)
return __memirq_source_page(memirq, hwe->instance);
}
+/* Return: offset to the status vector used by the given @source's nth @instance */
+static u32 memirq_status_vector_offset(struct xe_memirq *memirq, u16 source, u16 instance)
+{
+ memirq_assert(memirq, instance <= XE_HW_ENGINE_MAX_INSTANCE);
+
+ instance = hw_reports_to_instance_zero(memirq) ? instance : 0;
+ return XE_MEMIRQ_STATUS_OFFSET(instance) + source * SZ_16;
+}
+
+static u32 memirq_status_page_offset(struct xe_memirq *memirq, u16 instance)
+{
+ return memirq_status_vector_offset(memirq, 0, instance);
+}
+
static u32 __memirq_status_page(struct xe_memirq *memirq, u16 instance)
{
- memirq_assert(memirq, instance <= XE_HW_ENGINE_MAX_INSTANCE);
memirq_assert(memirq, memirq->bo);
- instance = hw_reports_to_instance_zero(memirq) ? instance : 0;
- return xe_bo_ggtt_addr(memirq->bo) + XE_MEMIRQ_STATUS_OFFSET(instance);
+ return xe_bo_ggtt_addr(memirq->bo) + memirq_status_page_offset(memirq, instance);
}
/**
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 14:27 [PATCH 00/13] drm/xe/tests: Add kunit tests for memory based interrupts Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/xe/ggtt: Rename parameter name in xe_ggtt_init_kunit() Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-29 20:29 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-04-30 8:32 ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-30 21:50 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/xe/guc: Allow to replace xe_guc_irq_handler() with stub Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-30 5:44 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/xe/hwe: Allow to replace xe_hw_engine_handle_irq() " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-30 5:47 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/xe/mmio: Allow to replace xe_mmio_read32|write32() " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-30 5:48 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/xe/kunit: Promote GGTT initialization to test_init() helper Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/xe/kunit: Promote fake BO activation " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/xe/kunit: Activate empty MMIO stubs in test_init() Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/xe/memirq: Make page layout macros private Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-05 7:54 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/xe/memirq: Introduce helper to calculate source page offset Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-05 8:27 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-04-28 14:27 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2026-05-05 12:40 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/xe/memirq: Introduce helper to calculate status vector offset Levi, Ilia
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/xe/memirq: Refactor xe_memirq_hwe_handler Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-05 12:46 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/xe/memirq: Dump additional source pages if MSI-X Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-05 13:12 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/xe/tests: Add kunit tests for memory based interrupts Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-28 16:33 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-04-28 16:35 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-04-28 17:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-29 5:04 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260428142722.582-11-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox