From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Wajdeczko, Michal" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@lankhorst.se" <dev@lankhorst.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] drm/xe/ggtt: Rename parameter name in xe_ggtt_init_kunit()
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:32:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9452d9c122d77d7b60c3705e7613461d7e1c4ad7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4561363a9ff4fc0449bd56df4c5ea9fa4d756f0b.camel@intel.com>
On Wed, 29 Apr 2026, "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-04-28 at 16:27 +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> The parameter name was changed by the commit 22437f30d2f0 ("drm/xe:
>> Start using ggtt->start in preparation of balloon removal"), but we
>> missed then to update the function prototype.
>>
>
> Include the Fixes:?
Does it really matter? It'll lead to a stable backport of an
inconsequental parameter rename.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Otherwise the change looks good I agree:
> Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>> ---
>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
>> index c864cc975a69..f0ac7ec0502a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.h
>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct drm_exec;
>>
>> struct xe_ggtt *xe_ggtt_alloc(struct xe_tile *tile);
>> int xe_ggtt_init_early(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt);
>> -int xe_ggtt_init_kunit(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u32 reserved, u32
>> size);
>> +int xe_ggtt_init_kunit(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u32 start, u32 size);
>> int xe_ggtt_init(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt);
>>
>> void xe_ggtt_shift_nodes(struct xe_ggtt *ggtt, u64 new_base);
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 14:27 [PATCH 00/13] drm/xe/tests: Add kunit tests for memory based interrupts Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/xe/ggtt: Rename parameter name in xe_ggtt_init_kunit() Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-29 20:29 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-04-30 8:32 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-04-30 21:50 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/xe/guc: Allow to replace xe_guc_irq_handler() with stub Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-30 5:44 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/xe/hwe: Allow to replace xe_hw_engine_handle_irq() " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-30 5:47 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/xe/mmio: Allow to replace xe_mmio_read32|write32() " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-30 5:48 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/xe/kunit: Promote GGTT initialization to test_init() helper Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/xe/kunit: Promote fake BO activation " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/xe/kunit: Activate empty MMIO stubs in test_init() Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/xe/memirq: Make page layout macros private Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-05 7:54 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/xe/memirq: Introduce helper to calculate source page offset Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-05 8:27 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/xe/memirq: Introduce helper to calculate status vector offset Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-05 12:40 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/xe/memirq: Refactor xe_memirq_hwe_handler Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-05 12:46 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/xe/memirq: Dump additional source pages if MSI-X Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-05 13:12 ` Levi, Ilia
2026-04-28 14:27 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/xe/tests: Add kunit tests for memory based interrupts Michal Wajdeczko
2026-04-28 16:33 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-04-28 16:35 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-04-28 17:43 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-29 5:04 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9452d9c122d77d7b60c3705e7613461d7e1c4ad7@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox