From: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V20 07/15] drm/xe/vram: Extract buddy allocation and free helpers
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 20:23:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902145343.465686-24-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902145343.465686-17-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Factor out xe_ttm_vram_buddy_alloc() and xe_ttm_vram_buddy_free()
from xe_ttm_vram_mgr_new() and xe_ttm_vram_mgr_del().
These new helpers consolidate block allocation/deallocation with
visible-size tracking. This modularization makes the logic reusable by
the upcoming VRAM page offlining reservation path.
This update includes a functional change: block->private now tracks the
owning ttm_resource instead of the tbo. Tracking the resource avoids
stale pointer bugs when TTM hands resources to a ghost object during
accelerated moves or pipelined gutting, ensuring the cached pointer
shares the exact lifetime of the blocks.
v2 (Matt B):
- Pass and store ttm_resource pointer rather than tbo to avoid stale
BO backpointers.
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
index 51e983ee3bad..a5116dc05166 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
@@ -49,6 +49,48 @@ static inline bool xe_is_vram_mgr_blocks_contiguous(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
return true;
}
+static int xe_ttm_vram_buddy_alloc(struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr *mgr, u64 start,
+ u64 end, u64 size, u64 min_page_size,
+ struct list_head *blocks, unsigned long flags,
+ struct ttm_resource *res, u64 *used_visible)
+{
+ struct gpu_buddy *mm = &mgr->mm;
+ struct gpu_buddy_block *block;
+ int err;
+
+ err = gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(mm, start, end, size, min_page_size, blocks, flags);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ /*
+ * Track the owning resource, never the owning BO. A BO backpointer
+ * cached here goes stale the moment TTM hands the resource to a ghost
+ * object (ttm_buffer_object_transfer()), which happens on every
+ * accelerated move and on pipelined gutting. The resource, in
+ * contrast, has exactly the same lifetime as these blocks and TTM
+ * keeps &ttm_resource.bo pointing at the current owner for us.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry(block, blocks, link)
+ block->private = res;
+
+ if (end <= mgr->visible_size) {
+ *used_visible = size;
+ } else {
+ list_for_each_entry(block, blocks, link) {
+ u64 blk_start = gpu_buddy_block_offset(block);
+
+ if (blk_start < mgr->visible_size) {
+ u64 blk_end = blk_start + gpu_buddy_block_size(mm, block);
+
+ *used_visible += min(blk_end, mgr->visible_size) - blk_start;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ mgr->visible_avail -= *used_visible;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int xe_ttm_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo,
const struct ttm_place *place,
@@ -57,7 +99,6 @@ static int xe_ttm_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr *mgr = to_xe_ttm_vram_mgr(man);
struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr_resource *vres;
struct gpu_buddy *mm = &mgr->mm;
- struct gpu_buddy_block *block;
u64 size, min_page_size;
unsigned long lpfn;
int err;
@@ -118,32 +159,12 @@ static int xe_ttm_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
goto error_unlock;
}
- err = gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(mm, (u64)place->fpfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
- (u64)lpfn << PAGE_SHIFT, size,
- min_page_size, &vres->blocks, vres->flags);
+ err = xe_ttm_vram_buddy_alloc(mgr, (u64)place->fpfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
+ (u64)lpfn << PAGE_SHIFT, size,
+ min_page_size, &vres->blocks, vres->flags,
+ &vres->base, &vres->used_visible_size);
if (err)
goto error_unlock;
-
- if (lpfn <= mgr->visible_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) {
- vres->used_visible_size = size;
- } else {
- struct gpu_buddy_block *block;
-
- list_for_each_entry(block, &vres->blocks, link) {
- u64 start = gpu_buddy_block_offset(block);
-
- if (start < mgr->visible_size) {
- u64 end = start + gpu_buddy_block_size(mm, block);
-
- vres->used_visible_size +=
- min(end, mgr->visible_size) - start;
- }
- }
- }
-
- mgr->visible_avail -= vres->used_visible_size;
- list_for_each_entry(block, &vres->blocks, link)
- block->private = tbo;
mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
if (!(vres->base.placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) &&
@@ -175,20 +196,27 @@ static int xe_ttm_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
return err;
}
+static void xe_ttm_vram_buddy_free(struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr *mgr,
+ struct list_head *blocks,
+ u64 used_visible)
+{
+ struct gpu_buddy_block *block;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(block, blocks, link)
+ block->private = NULL;
+ gpu_buddy_free_list(&mgr->mm, blocks, 0);
+ mgr->visible_avail += used_visible;
+}
+
static void xe_ttm_vram_mgr_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
struct ttm_resource *res)
{
struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr_resource *vres =
to_xe_ttm_vram_mgr_resource(res);
struct xe_ttm_vram_mgr *mgr = to_xe_ttm_vram_mgr(man);
- struct gpu_buddy *mm = &mgr->mm;
- struct gpu_buddy_block *block;
mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
- list_for_each_entry(block, &vres->blocks, link)
- block->private = NULL;
- gpu_buddy_free_list(mm, &vres->blocks, 0);
- mgr->visible_avail += vres->used_visible_size;
+ xe_ttm_vram_buddy_free(mgr, &vres->blocks, vres->used_visible_size);
mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
ttm_resource_fini(man, res);
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 14:53 [PATCH V20 00/15] Add memory page offlining support Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 01/15] drm/xe: Link VRAM object with gpu buddy Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 02/15] drm/xe: Link LRC BO and its execution queue with safe lifetime rules Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 03/15] drm/xe: Export xe_ttm_bo_purge() Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 04/15] drm/xe: Handle NULL resource and allow purging of VRAM pages Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 05/15] drm/xe/bo: Make xe_bo_is_user() public Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 06/15] drm/xe: Guard teardown paths against purged BOs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 15:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 17:52 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` Tejas Upadhyay [this message]
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 08/15] drm/xe/vram: Add page offline data structures and lifecycle Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 09/15] drm/xe/vram: Add VRAM page offline fault handler Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 23:04 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 4:22 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 7:57 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 10/15] drm/xe/configfs: Add disable_vram_page_offline attribute Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 17:56 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 11/15] drm/xe/ras: Cache disable_vram_page_offline policy at init Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 12/15] drm/xe/vram: Check disable_vram_page_offline policy in fault handler Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 17:57 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 18:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 13/15] drm/xe: Expose bad VRAM pages via debugfs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 18:00 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 23:08 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 18:36 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 14/15] drm/xe/uapi: Expose ban reason in EXEC_QUEUE_GET_PROPERTY_BAN Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 17:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 23:12 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 15/15] drm/xe: Add fault-inject based VRAM page offline injection Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 17:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add memory page offlining support (rev24) Patchwork
2026-09-02 17:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-02 17:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-03 6:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902145343.465686-24-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
--to=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox