From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tejas Upadhyay" <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V20 12/15] drm/xe/vram: Check disable_vram_page_offline policy in fault handler
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 16:48:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902164823.DD9C51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902145343.465686-29-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Unratelimited error logging in the VRAM address fault handler can cause dmesg flooding and DoS.
--
commit 5bfee849427fab2b54c95eec2934afe083fd4e87
Author: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
drm/xe/vram: Check disable_vram_page_offline policy in fault handler
This commit introduces a check in the VRAM address fault handler to verify the
disable_vram_page_offline policy. If enabled, it logs the corrupted address
and returns -EOPNOTSUPP so that RAS can report it without attempting to offline
the page.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> index 0ab92bc3c6998..00569c5279a83 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_vram_mgr.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -906,6 +907,12 @@ int xe_ttm_vram_handle_addr_fault(struct xe_device *xe, u64 addr)
> vram_mgr = &vr->ttm;
> mm = &vram_mgr->mm;
>
> + if (xe->ras.disable_vram_page_offline) {
> + xe_err(xe, "0x%llx is reported as corrupted address by HW\n",
> + addr);
[Severity: Medium]
Since this page is intentionally kept online and not offlined, can a corrupted
VRAM page accessed in a tight loop by a userspace application, or polled
continuously by the hardware, cause a log flood here?
Could this use a rate-limited logging function to prevent a potential local
Denial of Service (DoS) from continuous dmesg writes, especially on systems
with serial consoles?
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> /* Reserve page at address */
> return xe_ttm_vram_reserve_page_at_addr(xe, addr - vr->dpa_base, vram_mgr, mm);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902145343.465686-17-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com?part=12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 14:53 [PATCH V20 00/15] Add memory page offlining support Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 01/15] drm/xe: Link VRAM object with gpu buddy Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 02/15] drm/xe: Link LRC BO and its execution queue with safe lifetime rules Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 03/15] drm/xe: Export xe_ttm_bo_purge() Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 04/15] drm/xe: Handle NULL resource and allow purging of VRAM pages Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 05/15] drm/xe/bo: Make xe_bo_is_user() public Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 06/15] drm/xe: Guard teardown paths against purged BOs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 15:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 17:52 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 07/15] drm/xe/vram: Extract buddy allocation and free helpers Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 08/15] drm/xe/vram: Add page offline data structures and lifecycle Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 09/15] drm/xe/vram: Add VRAM page offline fault handler Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 23:04 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 4:22 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 7:57 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 10/15] drm/xe/configfs: Add disable_vram_page_offline attribute Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 17:56 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 11/15] drm/xe/ras: Cache disable_vram_page_offline policy at init Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 12/15] drm/xe/vram: Check disable_vram_page_offline policy in fault handler Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 17:57 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 18:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 13/15] drm/xe: Expose bad VRAM pages via debugfs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 18:00 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 23:08 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 18:36 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 14/15] drm/xe/uapi: Expose ban reason in EXEC_QUEUE_GET_PROPERTY_BAN Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 17:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 23:12 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 15/15] drm/xe: Add fault-inject based VRAM page offline injection Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 17:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add memory page offlining support (rev24) Patchwork
2026-09-02 17:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-02 17:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-03 6:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902164823.DD9C51F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).