From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tejas Upadhyay" <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V20 06/15] drm/xe: Guard teardown paths against purged BOs
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 15:57:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902155744.0ADA41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902145343.465686-23-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] xe_bo_unpin_external() is missing the xe_bo_is_purged() guard, which will cause a crash when unpinning purged DMA-buf exports.
- [High] xe_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access() fails to check if the BO is purged.
--
commit 58df7bf49c93c1c7134f73fd8224de6fa0f907f3
Author: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Subject: drm/xe: Guard teardown paths against purged BOs
This commit adds xe_bo_is_purged guards to various teardown and mapping
paths in the xe driver. It prevents unpinning or mapping a buffer object
that has already been purged by VRAM page offlining.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> index c255327669da5..b162753cebb70 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> @@ -3267,6 +3267,9 @@ void xe_bo_unpin(struct xe_bo *bo)
> struct ttm_place *place = &bo->placements[0];
> struct xe_device *xe = xe_bo_device(bo);
>
> + if (xe_bo_is_purged(bo))
> + return;
> +
[Severity: High]
Does xe_bo_unpin_external also need a check for purged BOs?
When a DMA-buf exported BO is purged, closing the DMA-buf file descriptor
from userspace will call xe_dma_buf_unpin, which calls xe_bo_unpin_external:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c:xe_dma_buf_unpin() {
...
xe_bo_unpin_external(bo);
}
Because xe_bo_unpin_external lacks the xe_bo_is_purged check, it will
attempt to unpin an already-unpinned BO. This leads to a pin_count underflow
and fails the assertion:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:xe_bo_unpin_external() {
...
xe_assert(xe, !bo->vm);
xe_assert(xe, xe_bo_is_pinned(bo));
...
}
> xe_assert(xe, !bo->ttm.base.import_attach);
> xe_assert(xe, xe_bo_is_pinned(bo));
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> index bf0728838ead5..5d9f1cd24b7f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ static struct sg_table *xe_dma_buf_map(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
> struct sg_table *sgt;
> int r = 0;
>
> + if (xe_bo_is_purged(bo))
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> +
[Severity: High]
Does xe_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access need a similar guard against purged BOs?
If a DMA-buf exported BO is purged, and userspace invokes the
DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC ioctl to begin CPU access, xe_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access
will call xe_bo_migrate:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_dma_buf.c:xe_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access() {
...
xe_validation_guard(...) {
ret = drm_exec_lock_obj(&exec, &bo->ttm.base);
...
ret = xe_bo_migrate(bo, XE_PL_TT, NULL, &exec);
...
}
Without an xe_bo_is_purged check before migrating, xe_bo_migrate will try
to migrate a destroyed buffer object. This can cause a NULL pointer
dereference since bo->ttm.resource->mem_type can be NULL for purged BOs,
or it will silently migrate the empty backing store to XE_PL_TT, providing
userspace with garbage memory.
> if (!attach->peer2peer && !xe_bo_can_migrate(bo, XE_PL_TT))
> return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
>
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902145343.465686-17-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 14:53 [PATCH V20 00/15] Add memory page offlining support Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 01/15] drm/xe: Link VRAM object with gpu buddy Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 02/15] drm/xe: Link LRC BO and its execution queue with safe lifetime rules Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 03/15] drm/xe: Export xe_ttm_bo_purge() Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 04/15] drm/xe: Handle NULL resource and allow purging of VRAM pages Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 05/15] drm/xe/bo: Make xe_bo_is_user() public Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 06/15] drm/xe: Guard teardown paths against purged BOs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 15:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 17:52 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 07/15] drm/xe/vram: Extract buddy allocation and free helpers Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 08/15] drm/xe/vram: Add page offline data structures and lifecycle Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 09/15] drm/xe/vram: Add VRAM page offline fault handler Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 23:04 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 4:22 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-03 7:57 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 10/15] drm/xe/configfs: Add disable_vram_page_offline attribute Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 17:56 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 11/15] drm/xe/ras: Cache disable_vram_page_offline policy at init Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 12/15] drm/xe/vram: Check disable_vram_page_offline policy in fault handler Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 17:57 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 18:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 13/15] drm/xe: Expose bad VRAM pages via debugfs Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 16:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 18:00 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-09-02 23:08 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 18:36 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 14/15] drm/xe/uapi: Expose ban reason in EXEC_QUEUE_GET_PROPERTY_BAN Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 17:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 23:12 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 14:53 ` [PATCH V20 15/15] drm/xe: Add fault-inject based VRAM page offline injection Tejas Upadhyay
2026-09-02 17:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add memory page offlining support (rev24) Patchwork
2026-09-02 17:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-02 17:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-03 6:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902155744.0ADA41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox