Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 17/24] drm/xe: Add device flag to enable PT mirroring across tiles
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 06:25:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925062511.4B67A1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925045320.1325860-18-matthew.brost@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] xe: wasted VRAM and forced cross-tile PT access for migration VMs when PT mirroring is disabled
--

commit ec37bcd236de3cdab70b39d0f31888be55640311
Author: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>

drm/xe: Add device flag to enable PT mirroring across tiles

This commit introduces a device flag to enable or disable page-table
mirroring across tiles. It defaults to enabled for PVC, aiming to allow
flexibility based on memory bandwidth needs.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 0f542f47b9a84..f450e1c6f7500 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1739,7 +1749,8 @@ struct xe_vm *xe_vm_create(struct xe_device *xe, u32 flags, struct xe_file *xef)
>  
>  		for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
>  			if (flags & XE_VM_FLAG_MIGRATION &&
> -			    tile->id != XE_VM_FLAG_TILE_ID(flags))
> +			    tile->id != XE_VM_FLAG_TILE_ID(flags) &&
> +			    (vm->xe->info.has_pt_mirror || id))
>  				continue;
>  
>  			vm->pt_root[id] = xe_pt_create(vm, tile, xe->info.vm_max_level,

[Severity: Medium]
When has_pt_mirror is false, does this logic in xe_vm_create() allocate
page tables that will never be used?

For normal VMs (where flags & XE_VM_FLAG_MIGRATION is false), the condition
fails and we allocate pt_root[id] for all tiles. However, xe_vm_pt_root()
will unconditionally return pt_root[0] when has_pt_mirror is false, leaving
pt_root[1..N] unused and wasting VRAM.

Additionally, for a migration VM targeting a secondary tile (e.g., tile 1),
the condition tile->id != 1 && (has_pt_mirror || 0) evaluates to false when
id == 0, causing it to allocate both pt_root[0] and pt_root[1].

[ ... ]
> @@ -5074,3 +5085,21 @@ void xe_vm_remove_exec_queue(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>  	}
>  	up_write(&vm->exec_queues.lock);
>  }
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_vm_pt_root() - Retrieve VM page-table root
> + * @vm: The VM.
> + * @tile_id: Tile ID
> + *
> + * Retrieve VM page-table root for a tile ID, used to abstract if PT mirroring is
> + * enabled across tiles.
> + *
> + * Return: VM page-table root for a tile ID
> + */
> +struct xe_pt *xe_vm_pt_root(struct xe_vm *vm, u8 tile_id)
> +{
> +	if (vm->xe->info.has_pt_mirror)
> +		return vm->pt_root[tile_id];
> +
> +	return vm->pt_root[0];
> +}

[Severity: Medium]
Does returning vm->pt_root[0] here in xe_vm_pt_root() when has_pt_mirror
is false force cross-tile VRAM access for migration VMs on secondary tiles?

As noted above, a migration VM targeting a secondary tile will have its page
tables allocated in pt_root[1]. But since xe_vm_pt_root(vm, 1) will return
pt_root[0], the migration engine on tile 1 will be forced to walk page
tables physically located in tile 0's VRAM.

Can this cause a performance regression for migration operations on secondary
tiles?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260925045320.1325860-1-matthew.brost@intel.com?part=17

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-25  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-25  4:52 [PATCH v7 00/24] CPU binds and ULLS on migration queue Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:52 ` [PATCH v7 01/24] drm/xe: reference VM from PT BOs Matthew Brost
2026-09-25 12:00   ` Francois Dugast
2026-09-25 16:10     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:52 ` [PATCH v7 02/24] drm/xe: Drop struct xe_migrate_pt_update argument from populate/clear vfuns Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:52 ` [PATCH v7 03/24] drm/xe: Add xe_migrate_update_pgtables_cpu_execute helper Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 04/24] drm/xe: Decouple exec queue idle check from LRC Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 05/24] drm/xe: Add job count to GuC exec queue snapshot Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 06/24] drm/xe: Update xe_bo_put_deferred arguments to include writeback flag Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 07/24] drm/xe: Update scheduler job layer to support PT jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-25 11:23   ` Francois Dugast
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 08/24] drm/xe: Add helpers to access PT ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 09/24] drm/xe: Add struct xe_pt_job_ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 10/24] drm/xe: Update GuC submission backend to run PT jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  5:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25  5:58     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 11/24] drm/xe: Store level in struct xe_vm_pgtable_update Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 12/24] drm/xe: Don't use migrate exec queue for page fault binds Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 13/24] drm/xe: Enable CPU binds for jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  6:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25  6:54     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 14/24] drm/xe: Remove unused arguments from xe_migrate_pt_update_ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 15/24] drm/xe: Make bind queues operate cross-tile Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 16/24] drm/xe: Add CPU bind layer Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 17/24] drm/xe: Add device flag to enable PT mirroring across tiles Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  6:25   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-25  7:21     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  9:51   ` Francois Dugast
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 18/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS support to LRC Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 19/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to migration layer Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  6:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25  7:17     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25 20:10       ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 20/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to ring ops Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  6:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25  7:02     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 21/24] drm/xe: Add ULLS migration job support to GuC submission Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  6:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25  7:08     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 22/24] drm/xe: Enter ULLS for migration jobs upon page fault or SVM prefetch Matthew Brost
2026-09-25 17:49   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2026-09-25 18:17     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25 18:26       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2026-09-25 19:38         ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 23/24] drm/xe: add migrate ULLS period configfs attribute Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  6:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25  7:08     ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  4:53 ` [PATCH v7 24/24] drm/xe: Document ULLS for migration jobs Matthew Brost
2026-09-25  5:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for CPU binds and ULLS on migration queue (rev9) Patchwork
2026-09-25  5:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-25  5:47 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-25 15:05 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-25 16:01   ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-25 18:08 ` [PATCH v7 00/24] CPU binds and ULLS on migration queue Maarten Lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260925062511.4B67A1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox