From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Arun R Murthy" <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>,
"Imre Deak" <imre.deak@intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] drm/display/dp: Read LTTPR caps without DPRX caps
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2026 11:18:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33d050c09290955321f01d61166e7763b6db2e77@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260305-dp_aux-v1-1-54ee0b5f5158@intel.com>
On Thu, 05 Mar 2026, Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> wrote:
> We at present have drm_dp_Read_lttpr_common_caps to read the LTTPR caps,
> but this function required DPRX caps to be passed. As per the DP2.1 spec
> section 3.6.8.6.1, section 2.12.1, section 2.12.3 (Link Policy) the
> LTTPR caps is to be read first followed by the DPRX capability.
> Hence adding another function to read the LTTPR caps without the need
> for DPRX caps.
If the spec says something, why are we keeping the function that does it
the other way?
> In order to handle the issue
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4531
> of reading corrupted values for LTTPR caps on few pannels with DP Rev 1.2
> the workaround of reducing the block size to 1 and reading one block at a
> time is done by checking for a valid link rate.
>
> Fixes: 657586e474bd ("drm/i915: Add a DP1.2 compatible way to read LTTPR capabilities")
You're not calling the code being added here. This can't fix anything on
its own. This is not how the Fixes: tag works.
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> index a697cc227e28964cd8322803298178e7d788e820..9fe7db73027a43b01c4d12927f1f0e61444658e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -3050,6 +3050,69 @@ static int drm_dp_read_lttpr_regs(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool drm_dp_valid_link_rate(u8 link_rate)
> +{
> + switch (link_rate) {
> + case 0x06:
> + case 0x0a:
> + case 0x14:
> + case 0x1e:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_dp_read_lttpr_caps - read the LTTPR capabilities
> + * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
> + * @caps: buffer to return the capability info in
> + *
> + * Read capabilities common to all LTTPRs.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int drm_dp_read_lttpr_caps(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> + u8 caps[DP_LTTPR_COMMON_CAP_SIZE])
> +{
> + /*
> + * At least the DELL P2715Q monitor with a DPCD_REV < 0x14 returns
> + * corrupted values when reading from the 0xF0000- range with a block
> + * size bigger than 1.
> + * For DP as per the spec DP2.1 section 3.6.8.6.1, section 2.12.1, section
> + * 2.12.3 (Link Policy) the LTTPR caps is to be read first followed by the
> + * DPRX capability.
> + * So ideally we dont have DPCD_REV yet to check for the revision, instead
> + * check for the correctness of the read value and in found corrupted read
> + * block by block.
> + */
> + int block_size;
> + int offset;
> + int ret;
> + int address = DP_LT_TUNABLE_PHY_REPEATER_FIELD_DATA_STRUCTURE_REV;
> + int buf_size = DP_LTTPR_COMMON_CAP_SIZE;
> +
> + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read_data(aux, address, &caps, buf_size);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (caps[0] == 0x14) {
> + if (!drm_dp_valid_link_rate(caps[1])) {
So you first read the whole thing once, and then in some cases read the
whole thing again one byte at a time?
Everything about this smells like a quirk for a specific display, not
something you do normally. We shouldn't have to have two ways to read
the lttpr caps in the normal case.
> + block_size = 1;
What's the point with the variable?
> + for (offset = 0; offset < buf_size; offset += block_size) {
> + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read_data(aux,
> + address + offset,
> + &caps[offset],
> + block_size);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_read_lttpr_caps);
> +
> /**
> * drm_dp_read_lttpr_common_caps - read the LTTPR common capabilities
> * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
> diff --git a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h
> index 1d0acd58f48676f60ff6a07cc6812f72cbb452e8..def145e67011c325b790c807f934b288304260c1 100644
> --- a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -755,6 +755,8 @@ bool drm_dp_read_sink_count_cap(struct drm_connector *connector,
> const struct drm_dp_desc *desc);
> int drm_dp_read_sink_count(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
>
> +int drm_dp_read_lttpr_caps(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> + u8 caps[DP_LTTPR_COMMON_CAP_SIZE]);
> int drm_dp_read_lttpr_common_caps(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE],
> u8 caps[DP_LTTPR_COMMON_CAP_SIZE]);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 8:18 [PATCH RFC 0/4] DP: Read LTTPR caps followed by DPRX caps Arun R Murthy
2026-03-05 8:18 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] drm/display/dp: Read LTTPR caps without " Arun R Murthy
2026-03-05 9:18 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-03-06 4:08 ` Murthy, Arun R
2026-03-05 16:29 ` Imre Deak
2026-03-06 4:10 ` Murthy, Arun R
2026-03-05 8:18 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] drm/i915/dp: Read LTTPR caps followed by " Arun R Murthy
2026-03-05 8:18 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] drm/i915/dp: On HPD read " Arun R Murthy
2026-03-05 8:18 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] drm/i915/dp: DPRX/LTTPR caps for DP should be read once Arun R Murthy
2026-03-05 16:11 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] DP: Read LTTPR caps followed by DPRX caps Imre Deak
2026-03-06 4:29 ` Murthy, Arun R
2026-03-06 9:46 ` Imre Deak
2026-03-10 8:58 ` Murthy, Arun R
2026-03-06 4:29 ` Murthy, Arun R
2026-03-06 3:42 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for " Patchwork
2026-03-06 3:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-06 4:33 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-07 1:55 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33d050c09290955321f01d61166e7763b6db2e77@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox