Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Aakash Deep Sarkar <aakash.deep.sarkar@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jeevaka.badrappan@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
	matthew.brost@intel.com, carlos.santa@intel.com,
	matthew.auld@intel.com,
	Aakash Deep Sarkar <aakash.deep.sarkar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/xe: Implement xe_work_period_worker
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 14:31:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cf9a71439b5d79751f6b7879bdc6b917d023d2d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250926104521.1815428-7-aakash.deep.sarkar@intel.com>

On Fri, 26 Sep 2025, Aakash Deep Sarkar <aakash.deep.sarkar@intel.com> wrote:
> The work of collecting the GPU run time for a given
> xe_user and emitting its event, is done by the
> xe_work_period_worker kworker. At the time of creation
> of a new xe_user, we simultaneously start a delayed
> kworker thread. The delay of execution is set to be
> 500 ms. After the completion of the work, the kworker
> schedules itself for the next execution. This is done
> as long as the reference to the xe_user pointer is
> valid.
>
> During each execution cycle the xe_work_period_worker
> iterates over all the xe files in the xe_user::filelist
> and accumulate their corresponding GPU runtime into the
> xe_user::active_duration_ns; while also updating each of
> the xe_file::active_duration_ns. The total runtime for
> this uid in the current sampling period is the delta
> between the previous xe_user::active_duration_ns and
> the current xe_user::active_duration_ns.
>
> We also record the current timestamp at the end of each
> invocation to xe_work_period_worker function in the
> xe_user::last_timestamp_ns. The sampling period for this
> uid is the delta between the previous timestamp and the
> current timestamp.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aakash Deep Sarkar <aakash.deep.sarkar@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c |  13 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c     |   5 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_user.c   | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_user.h   |  21 ++++--
>  4 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 837c23784388..5569a27abb09 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -81,11 +81,9 @@ static int xe_file_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
>  {
>  	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
>  	struct xe_drm_client *client;
> -	struct xe_user *user;
>  	struct xe_file *xef;
>  	int ret = -ENOMEM;
>  	int uid = -EINVAL;
> -	u32 idx;
>  	struct task_struct *task = NULL;
>  	const struct cred *cred = NULL;
>  
> @@ -142,11 +140,12 @@ static void xe_file_destroy(struct kref *ref)
>  	xe_drm_client_put(xef->client);
>  	kfree(xef->process_name);
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&xef->user->filelist_lock);
> -	list_del(&xef->user_link);
> -	mutex_unlock(&xef->user->filelist_lock);
> -
> -	xe_user_put(xef->user);
> +	if (xef->user) {
> +		mutex_lock(&xef->user->lock);
> +		list_del(&xef->user_link);
> +		xe_user_put(xef->user);
> +		mutex_unlock(&xef->user->lock);
> +	}
>  	kfree(xef);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> index b7e3094f8acf..c7add2616189 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include "xe_pxp.h"
>  #include "xe_sriov_vf_ccs.h"
>  #include "xe_trace.h"
> +#include "xe_user.h"
>  #include "xe_vm.h"
>  #include "xe_wa.h"
>  
> @@ -598,6 +599,8 @@ int xe_pm_runtime_suspend(struct xe_device *xe)
>  
>  	xe_i2c_pm_suspend(xe);
>  
> +	xe_user_cancel_workers(xe);
> +
>  	xe_rpm_lockmap_release(xe);
>  	xe_pm_write_callback_task(xe, NULL);
>  	return 0;
> @@ -650,6 +653,8 @@ int xe_pm_runtime_resume(struct xe_device *xe)
>  
>  	xe_i2c_pm_resume(xe, xe->d3cold.allowed);
>  
> +	xe_user_resume_workers(xe);
> +
>  	xe_irq_resume(xe);
>  
>  	for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_user.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_user.c
> index 846c6451140b..19b28bcada0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_user.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_user.c
> @@ -6,17 +6,95 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>  
> +#include "xe_assert.h"
> +#include "xe_device_types.h"
> +#include "xe_exec_queue.h"
> +#include "xe_pm.h"
>  #include "xe_user.h"
>  
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include <trace/gpu_work_period.h>
> +
> +static inline void schedule_next_work(struct xe_device *xe, unsigned int id)
> +{
> +	struct xe_user *user;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&xe->work_period.lock);
> +	user = xa_load(&xe->work_period.users, id);
> +	if (user && xe_user_get_unless_zero(user))
> +		schedule_delayed_work(&user->delay_work,
> +				msecs_to_jiffies(XE_WORK_PERIOD_INTERVAL));
> +	mutex_unlock(&xe->work_period.lock);
> +}
>  /**
>   * worker thread to emit gpu work period event for this xe user
>   * @work: work instance for this xe user
>   *
>   * Return: void
>   */
> -static inline void work_period_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void xe_work_period_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
> -	//TODO: Implement this worker
> +	struct xe_user *user = container_of(work, struct xe_user, delay_work.work);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = user->xe;
> +	struct xe_file *xef;
> +	struct xe_exec_queue *q;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The GPU work period event requires the following parameters
> +	 *
> +	 * gpuid:           GPU index in case the platform has more than one GPU
> +	 * uid:             user id of the app
> +	 * start_time:      start time for the sampling period in nanosecs
> +	 * end_time:        end time for the sampling period in nanosecs
> +	 * active_duration: Total runtime in nanosecs for this uid in
> +	 *                  the current sampling period.
> +	 */
> +	u32 gpuid = 0, uid = user->uid, id = user->id;
> +	u64 start_time, end_time, active_duration;
> +	u64 last_active_duration, last_timestamp;
> +	unsigned long i;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&user->lock);
> +
> +	// Save the last recorded active duration and timestamp
> +	last_active_duration = user->active_duration_ns;
> +	last_timestamp = user->last_timestamp_ns;
> +
> +	if (xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(xe)) {
> +
> +		list_for_each_entry(xef, &user->filelist, user_link) {
> +
> +			wait_var_event(&xef->exec_queue.pending_removal,
> +			!atomic_read(&xef->exec_queue.pending_removal));
> +
> +			/* Accumulate all the exec queues from this file */
> +			mutex_lock(&xef->exec_queue.lock);
> +			xa_for_each(&xef->exec_queue.xa, i, q) {
> +				xe_exec_queue_get(q);
> +				mutex_unlock(&xef->exec_queue.lock);
> +
> +				xe_exec_queue_update_run_ticks(q);
> +
> +				mutex_lock(&xef->exec_queue.lock);
> +				xe_exec_queue_put(q);
> +			}
> +			mutex_unlock(&xef->exec_queue.lock);
> +			user->active_duration_ns += xef->active_duration_ns;
> +		}
> +
> +		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> +
> +		start_time = last_timestamp + 1;
> +		end_time = ktime_get_raw_ns();
> +		active_duration = user->active_duration_ns - last_active_duration;
> +		trace_gpu_work_period(gpuid, uid, start_time, end_time, active_duration);
> +		user->last_timestamp_ns = end_time;
> +		xe_user_put(user);
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&user->lock);
> +
> +	schedule_next_work(xe, id);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -38,9 +116,9 @@ static struct xe_user *xe_user_alloc(void)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	kref_init(&user->refcount);
> -	mutex_init(&user->filelist_lock);
> +	mutex_init(&user->lock);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&user->filelist);
> -	INIT_WORK(&user->work, work_period_worker);
> +	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&user->delay_work, xe_work_period_worker);
>  	return user;
>  }
>  
> @@ -120,12 +198,49 @@ int xe_user_init(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef, unsigned int uid)
>  
>  		user->id = idx;
>  		drm_dev_get(&xe->drm);
> +
> +		xe_user_get(user);
> +		if (!schedule_delayed_work(&user->delay_work,
> +					msecs_to_jiffies(XE_WORK_PERIOD_INTERVAL)))
> +			xe_user_put(user);
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&user->filelist_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&user->lock);
>  	list_add(&xef->user_link, &user->filelist);
> -	mutex_unlock(&user->filelist_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&user->lock);
>  	xef->user = user;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +void xe_user_cancel_workers(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> +	struct xe_user *user = NULL;
> +	unsigned long i = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&xe->work_period.lock);
> +	xa_for_each(&xe->work_period.users, i, user) {
> +		if (user && xe_user_get_unless_zero(user)) {
> +			cancel_delayed_work_sync(&user->delay_work);
> +			xe_user_put(user);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&xe->work_period.lock);
> +}
> +
> +void xe_user_resume_workers(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> +	struct xe_user *user = NULL;
> +	unsigned long i = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&xe->work_period.lock);
> +	xa_for_each(&xe->work_period.users, i, user) {
> +		if (user && xe_user_get_unless_zero(user)) {
> +			if (!schedule_delayed_work(&user->delay_work,
> +					msecs_to_jiffies(XE_WORK_PERIOD_INTERVAL)))
> +				xe_user_put(user);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&xe->work_period.lock);
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_user.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_user.h
> index b13130cc9492..ded816be7334 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_user.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_user.h
> @@ -11,9 +11,11 @@
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  
> -#include "xe_device.h"
> +#include "xe_device_types.h"

This shouldn't be needed, neither should.

>  
>  
> +#define XE_WORK_PERIOD_INTERVAL 500
> +
>  /**
>   * This is a per process/user id structure for a xe device
>   * client. It is allocated when a new process/app opens the
> @@ -32,9 +34,9 @@ struct xe_user {
>  	struct xe_device *xe;
>  
>  	/**
> -	 * @filelist_lock: lock protecting the filelist
> +	 * @filelist_lock: lock protecting this structure
>  	 */
> -	struct mutex filelist_lock;
> +	struct mutex lock;
>  
>  	/**
>  	 * @filelist: list of xe files belonging to this xe user
> @@ -45,7 +47,7 @@ struct xe_user {
>  	 * @work: work to emit the gpu work period event for this
>  	 * xe user
>  	 */
> -	struct work_struct work;
> +	struct delayed_work delay_work;
>  
>  	/**
>  	 * @id: index of this user into the xe device users array
> @@ -72,6 +74,17 @@ struct xe_user {
>  
>  int xe_user_init(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef, unsigned int uid);
>  
> +void xe_user_cancel_workers(struct xe_device *xe);
> +
> +void xe_user_resume_workers(struct xe_device *xe);
> +
> +static inline struct xe_user *
> +xe_user_get_unless_zero(struct xe_user *user)
> +{
> +	if (kref_get_unless_zero(&user->refcount))
> +		return user;
> +	return NULL;
> +}

This is only ever used in xe_user.c. There's no need to add it to a
header.

>  
>  static inline struct xe_user *
>  xe_user_get(struct xe_user *user)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-26 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-26 10:45 [PATCH v4 0/9] [ANDROID]: Add GPU work period support for Xe driver Aakash Deep Sarkar
2025-09-26 10:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] drm/xe: Add a new xe_user structure Aakash Deep Sarkar
2025-10-02 14:40   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-09-26 10:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] drm/xe: Add xe_gt_clock_interval_to_ns function Aakash Deep Sarkar
2025-09-26 10:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] drm/xe: Add a trace point for GPU work period Aakash Deep Sarkar
2025-10-02 14:42   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-10-03 21:41     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-09-26 10:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] drm/xe: Modify xe_exec_queue_update_run_ticks Aakash Deep Sarkar
2025-09-26 10:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] drm/xe: Handle xe_user creation and removal Aakash Deep Sarkar
2025-09-26 11:29   ` Jani Nikula
2025-09-26 10:45 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] drm/xe: Implement xe_work_period_worker Aakash Deep Sarkar
2025-09-26 11:31   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-09-26 10:45 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] drm/xe: Add a Kconfig option for GPU work period Aakash Deep Sarkar
2025-09-26 10:45 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] drm/xe: Handle xe_work_period destruction Aakash Deep Sarkar
2025-09-26 11:32   ` Jani Nikula
2025-09-26 10:45 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] Hack patch: Do not merge Aakash Deep Sarkar
2025-09-26 11:59 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for : Add GPU work period support for Xe driver (rev4) Patchwork
2025-09-26 12:01 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-09-26 12:51 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-26 18:04 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3cf9a71439b5d79751f6b7879bdc6b917d023d2d@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aakash.deep.sarkar@intel.com \
    --cc=carlos.santa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jeevaka.badrappan@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox