From: "Mallesh, Koujalagi" <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>
To: "Tauro, Riana" <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
<aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
<raag.jadav@intel.com>, <ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com>,
<soham.purkait@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add helper to clear error counter
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:12:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50cb3787-6763-4673-a29e-b7c347a3bb75@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be71197e-7cb1-4ded-b9b4-3e4b2ac200b4@intel.com>
Hi Riana,
On 11-05-2026 11:50 am, Tauro, Riana wrote:
> Hi Mallesh
>
> On 5/8/2026 1:20 PM, Mallesh, Koujalagi wrote:
>>
>> On 04-05-2026 12:26 pm, Riana Tauro wrote:
>>> Add structures and helper function to clear error counter value.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2: add status codes (Aravind)
>>> fix log message
>>> squash structure patch (Raag)
>>>
>>> v3: rename function
>>> add comma to enum members to avoid
>>> redundant churn
>>> align with tabs (Raag)
>>>
>>> v4: rebase
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c | 76
>>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.h | 2 +
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h | 25 ++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox_types.h | 2 +
>>> 4 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
>>> index 47a58ce3b3ca..07f6837694e7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.c
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,17 @@ enum xe_ras_component {
>>> XE_RAS_COMP_MAX
>>> };
>>> +/* RAS response status codes */
>>> +enum xe_ras_response_status {
>>> + XE_RAS_STATUS_SUCCESS = 0,
>>> + XE_RAS_STATUS_INVALID_PARAM,
>>> + XE_RAS_STATUS_OP_NOT_SUPPORTED,
>>> + XE_RAS_STATUS_TIMEOUT,
>>> + XE_RAS_STATUS_HARDWARE_FAILURE,
>>> + XE_RAS_STATUS_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES,
>>> + XE_RAS_STATUS_UNKNOWN_ERROR
>>> +};
>> Add XE_RAS_STATUS_MAX right
>>> +
>>> static const char *const xe_ras_severities[] = {
>>> [XE_RAS_SEV_NOT_SUPPORTED] = "Not Supported",
>>> [XE_RAS_SEV_CORRECTABLE] = "Correctable Error",
>>> @@ -53,6 +64,16 @@ static const char *const xe_ras_components[] = {
>>> };
>>> static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(xe_ras_components) == XE_RAS_COMP_MAX);
>>> +static const int ras_status_to_errno_map[] = {
>>> + [XE_RAS_STATUS_SUCCESS] = 0,
>>> + [XE_RAS_STATUS_INVALID_PARAM] = -EINVAL,
>>> + [XE_RAS_STATUS_OP_NOT_SUPPORTED] = -EOPNOTSUPP,
>>> + [XE_RAS_STATUS_TIMEOUT] = -ETIMEDOUT,
>>> + [XE_RAS_STATUS_HARDWARE_FAILURE] = -EIO,
>>> + [XE_RAS_STATUS_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES] = -ENAVAIL,
>>> + [XE_RAS_STATUS_UNKNOWN_ERROR] = -ENODATA
>>
>> Are ENAVAIL(No XENIX semaphores available)/ENODATA(No data available)
>> correct errno choice?
>
> This is the closest error code i could find. Let me know if you have
> any suggestions.
We can use (suggestion):
[XE_RAS_STATUS_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES] = -ENOSPC
-"No Space left": Standard kernel convention for "resource exhausted"
[XE_RAS_STATUS_UNKNOWN_ERROR] = -EIO,
- "I/O error": Catch all firmware/hardware failure.
>
>>
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> /* Mapping from drm_xe_ras_error_component to xe_ras_component */
>>> static const int drm_to_xe_ras_component[] = {
>>> [DRM_XE_RAS_ERR_COMP_CORE_COMPUTE] = XE_RAS_COMP_CORE_COMPUTE,
>>> @@ -70,6 +91,13 @@ static const int drm_to_xe_ras_severity[] = {
>>> };
>>> static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(drm_to_xe_ras_severity) ==
>>> DRM_XE_RAS_ERR_SEV_MAX);
>>> +static int ras_status_to_errno(enum xe_ras_response_status status)
>>> +{
>>> + if (status > XE_RAS_STATUS_UNKNOWN_ERROR)
>>> + status = XE_RAS_STATUS_UNKNOWN_ERROR;
>>> +
>>
>> Check status against XE_RAS_STASTUS_MAX, if it failed log in and
>> provide -EIO and return.
>
>
> Why? Unknown error makes sense too right? Any error above the enum
> range is unknown.
Out of range status, we are clamping it silently (Unknown error). We
need to log it (status) immediately which make sense to debug issue.
Thanks,
-/Mallesh
> Thanks
> Riana
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -/Mallesh
>>
>>> + return ras_status_to_errno_map[status];
>>> +}
>>> static inline const char *sev_to_str(u8 severity)
>>> {
>>> if (severity >= XE_RAS_SEV_MAX)
>>> @@ -182,3 +210,51 @@ int xe_ras_get_counter(struct xe_device *xe,
>>> enum drm_xe_ras_error_severity seve
>>> guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
>>> return get_counter(xe, &error_class, value);
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * xe_ras_clear_counter() - Clear error counter value
>>> + * @xe: xe device instance
>>> + * @severity: Error severity level to be cleared
>>> + * @error_id: Error component to be cleared
>>> + *
>>> + * This function clears the value of a specific error counter based on
>>> + * the error severity and component.
>>> + *
>>> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
>>> + */
>>> +int xe_ras_clear_counter(struct xe_device *xe, enum
>>> drm_xe_ras_error_severity severity,
>>> + u32 error_id)
>>> +{
>>> + struct xe_ras_clear_counter_response response = {0};
>>> + struct xe_ras_clear_counter_request request = {0};
>>> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command command = {0};
>>> + struct xe_ras_error_class *error_class;
>>> + size_t rlen;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + error_class = &request.error_class;
>>> + error_class->common.severity = drm_to_xe_ras_severity[severity];
>>> + error_class->common.component = drm_to_xe_ras_component[error_id];
>>> +
>>> + prepare_ras_command(&command, XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_CLEAR_COUNTER,
>>> &request, sizeof(request),
>>> + &response, sizeof(response));
>>> +
>>> + guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
>>> + ret = xe_sysctrl_send_command(&xe->sc, &command, &rlen);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: failed to clear counter %d\n", ret);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (rlen != sizeof(response)) {
>>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: unexpected clear counter response
>>> length %zu (expected %zu)\n",
>>> + rlen, sizeof(response));
>>> + return -EIO;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ret = ras_status_to_errno(response.status);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: clear counter command failed with
>>> status %d\n", ret);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.h
>>> index 74582c911b02..bbb9d42bd128 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras.h
>>> @@ -15,5 +15,7 @@ void xe_ras_counter_threshold_crossed(struct
>>> xe_device *xe,
>>> struct xe_sysctrl_event_response *response);
>>> int xe_ras_get_counter(struct xe_device *xe, enum
>>> drm_xe_ras_error_severity severity,
>>> u32 error_id, u32 *value);
>>> +int xe_ras_clear_counter(struct xe_device *xe, enum
>>> drm_xe_ras_error_severity severity,
>>> + u32 error_id);
>>> #endif
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h
>>> index 74d85875cd63..44369fc8ef03 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ras_types.h
>>> @@ -100,4 +100,29 @@ struct xe_ras_get_counter_response {
>>> u32 reserved1[56];
>>> } __packed;
>>> +/**
>>> + * struct xe_ras_clear_counter_request - Request for clearing an
>>> error counter
>>> + */
>>> +struct xe_ras_clear_counter_request {
>>> + /** @error_class: Counter class to be cleared */
>>> + struct xe_ras_error_class error_class;
>>> + /** @reserved: Reserved for future use */
>>> + u32 reserved;
>>> +} __packed;
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * struct xe_ras_clear_counter_response - Response after clearing
>>> an error counter
>>> + */
>>> +struct xe_ras_clear_counter_response {
>>> + /** @error_class: Counter class that was cleared */
>>> + struct xe_ras_error_class error_class;
>>> + /** @previous_counter_value: Counter value before clearing */
>>> + u32 previous_counter_value;
>>> + /** @clear_timestamp: Timestamp when the counter was cleared */
>>> + u64 clear_timestamp;
>>> + /** @status: Status of the clear operation */
>>> + u32 status;
>>> + /** @reserved: Reserved for future use */
>>> + u32 reserved[3];
>>> +} __packed;
>>> #endif
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox_types.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox_types.h
>>> index b315847cbf64..6e3753554510 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox_types.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox_types.h
>>> @@ -23,10 +23,12 @@ enum xe_sysctrl_group {
>>> * enum xe_sysctrl_gfsp_cmd - Commands supported by GFSP group
>>> *
>>> * @XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_COUNTER: Get error counter value
>>> + * @XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_CLEAR_COUNTER: Clear error counter value
>>> * @XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_PENDING_EVENT: Retrieve pending event
>>> */
>>> enum xe_sysctrl_gfsp_cmd {
>>> XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_COUNTER = 0x03,
>>> + XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_CLEAR_COUNTER = 0x04,
>>> XE_SYSCTRL_CMD_GET_PENDING_EVENT = 0x07,
>>> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-04 6:56 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add get-error-counter and clear-error-counter support for CRI Riana Tauro
2026-05-04 6:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Add get-error-counter and clear-error-counter support for CRI (rev4) Patchwork
2026-05-04 6:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-05-04 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] drm/xe/uapi: Add additional error components to xe drm_ras Riana Tauro
2026-05-08 6:37 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-05-12 6:58 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-05-04 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add support to get error counter in CRI Riana Tauro
2026-05-06 8:03 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-05-06 8:59 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-05-11 15:27 ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-12 5:27 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-05-12 5:47 ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-13 8:43 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-05-04 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] drm/xe/xe_ras: Add helper to clear error counter Riana Tauro
2026-05-08 7:50 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-05-11 6:20 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-05-11 7:42 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi [this message]
2026-05-11 7:49 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-05-11 15:32 ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-12 6:48 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-05-04 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] drm/xe/xe_drm_ras: Wire get-error-counter and clear-error-counter support for CRI Riana Tauro
2026-05-11 15:34 ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-12 5:08 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-05-04 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] drm/xe/xe_ras: Move xe drm_ras registration Riana Tauro
2026-05-04 10:53 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-05-04 16:22 ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-12 5:04 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-05-12 16:19 ` Anoop Vijay
2026-05-11 15:36 ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-04 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] drm/xe/xe_ras: Control xe drm_ras registration with a flag Riana Tauro
2026-05-11 15:46 ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-04 8:00 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Add get-error-counter and clear-error-counter support for CRI (rev4) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50cb3787-6763-4673-a29e-b7c347a3bb75@intel.com \
--to=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.kishore.koppuravuri@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox